Literature DB >> 11133332

The impact of medicare funding on the use of mammography among older women: implications for improving access to screening.

M Kelaher1, J M Stellman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 1991, a policy change extended finan cial coverage for biennial mammography to holders of Medicare part B. The impact of this decision on mammography use was examined by comparing mammography use among Medicare-eligible and ineligible women in the years before (1990) and after (1993) the policy change, using National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data, controlling for socioeconomic indicators and for having a usual source of medical care.
METHODS: The Medicare-eligible group consists of 2,419 women ages 65-69 years and women ages 60-64 years who are Medicare-eligible. The Medicare-ineligible group consists of 1,872 women ages 60-64 years. The analysis used logistic regressions and compared women who had undergone mammography in the prior 2 years and controlled for race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, insurance status, and usual source of care.
RESULTS: Medicare reimbursement of mammography appears to have increased the number of Medicare-eligible women who had had a mammogram in the 2 years prior to the survey. However, the analyses suggested that disparities in mammography use due to access to primary care and socioeconomic status persisted after the change in Medicare coverage. Analyses indicated that having additional insurance was the only significant predictor of having a usual source of care among the Medicare population.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that simply removing financial barriers to mammography for older women (such as the 1998 elimination of a deductible payment for mammograms provided under Medicare) may have limited effectiveness. The strong relationship between having a usual source of care and mammography suggests that disparities in mammography use may reflect inequalities in access to health care in general. Copyright 2000 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11133332     DOI: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  13 in total

1.  An age-period-cohort analysis of cancer incidence among the oldest old, Utah 1973-2002.

Authors:  Heidi A Hanson; Ken R Smith; Antoinette M Stroup; C Janna Harrell
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  2014-11-14

2.  Hispanic ethnicity, rural residence, and regular source of care.

Authors:  James E Rohrer; Gina Kruse; Yun Zhang
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2004-02

3.  Ethnic differences in decisional balance and stages of mammography adoption.

Authors:  Regina Otero-Sabogal; Susan Stewart; Sarah J Shema; Rena J Pasick
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2006-08-04

4.  Screening and Selection: The Case of Mammograms.

Authors:  Liran Einav; Amy Finkelstein; Tamar Oostrom; Abigail Ostriker; Heidi Williams
Journal:  Am Econ Rev       Date:  2020-12

5.  Health Insurance Mandates, Mammography, and Breast Cancer Diagnoses.

Authors:  Marianne P Bitler; Christopher S Carpenter
Journal:  Am Econ J Econ Policy       Date:  2016-08

6.  Perceptions of insurance coverage for screening mammography among women in need of screening.

Authors:  Ann Scheck McAlearney; Katherine W Reeves; Cathy Tatum; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Mammography utilization among Black and White Medicare beneficiaries in high breast cancer mortality US counties.

Authors:  Mandeep K Virk-Baker; Michelle Y Martin; Robert S Levine; Xin Wang; Tim R Nagy; Maria Pisu
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Access to bone mineral density testing in patients at risk for osteoporosis.

Authors:  D H Solomon; J M Polinski; C Truppo; C Egan; S Jan; M Patel; T W Weiss; Y T Chen; M A Brookhart
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Mammography facilities are accessible, so why is utilization so low?

Authors:  Lee R Mobley; Tzy-Mey May Kuo; Laurel J Clayton; W Douglas Evans
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Reducing disparities in mammography-use in a multicultural population in Israel.

Authors:  Orna Baron-Epel; Nurit Friedman; Omri Lernau
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2009-05-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.