Literature DB >> 25396304

An age-period-cohort analysis of cancer incidence among the oldest old, Utah 1973-2002.

Heidi A Hanson1, Ken R Smith, Antoinette M Stroup, C Janna Harrell.   

Abstract

We used age-period-cohort (APC) analyses to describe the simultaneous effects of age, period, and cohort on cancer incidence rates in an attempt to understand the population dynamics underlying their patterns among those aged 85+. Data from the Utah Cancer Registry (UCR), the US Census, the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), and the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) programme were used to generate age-specific estimates of cancer incidence at ages 65-99 from 1973 to 2002 for Utah. Our results showed increasing cancer incidence rates up to the 85-89 age group followed by declines at ages 90-99 when not confounded by the separate influences of period and cohort effects. We found significant period and cohort effects, suggesting the role of environmental mechanisms in cancer incidence trends between the ages of 85 and 100.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ageing; age–period–cohort; cancer; morbidity deceleration; oldest old

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25396304      PMCID: PMC4428162          DOI: 10.1080/00324728.2014.958192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)        ISSN: 0032-4728


  38 in total

1.  How individual age-associated changes may influence human morbidity and mortality patterns.

Authors:  S V Ukraintseva; A I Yashin
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 5.432

2.  Peak and decline in cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence at old ages.

Authors:  Charles Harding; Francesco Pompei; Richard Wilson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Age-period-cohort models for the Lexis diagram.

Authors:  B Carstensen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Trends in U.S. adult chronic disease mortality, 1960-1999: age, period, and cohort variations.

Authors:  Yang Yang
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2008-05

Review 5.  Subdividing the age group of 85 years and older to improve US disease reporting.

Authors:  Francis P Boscoe
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Biodemographic trajectories of longevity.

Authors:  J W Vaupel; J R Carey; K Christensen; T E Johnson; A I Yashin; N V Holm; I A Iachine; V Kannisto; A A Khazaeli; P Liedo; V D Longo; Y Zeng; K G Manton; J W Curtsinger
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-08       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Assessing validity and application scope of the intrinsic estimator approach to the age-period-cohort problem.

Authors:  Liying Luo
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2013-12

Review 8.  Cancer of the oldest old. What we have learned from autopsy studies.

Authors:  G Stanta; L Campagner; F Cavallieri; L Giarelli
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.076

9.  Human actuarial aging increases faster when background death rates are lower: a consequence of differential heterogeneity?

Authors:  Kristen Hawkes; Ken R Smith; James K Blevins
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Do birth cohorts matter? Age-period-cohort analyses of the obesity epidemic in the United States.

Authors:  Eric N Reither; Robert M Hauser; Yang Yang
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  6 in total

1.  Cell division rates decrease with age, providing a potential explanation for the age-dependent deceleration in cancer incidence.

Authors:  Cristian Tomasetti; Justin Poling; Nicholas J Roberts; Nyall R London; Meredith E Pittman; Michael C Haffner; Anthony Rizzo; Alex Baras; Baktiar Karim; Antonio Kim; Christopher M Heaphy; Alan K Meeker; Ralph H Hruban; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Bert Vogelstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Changes in Life Expectancy and Disability-Free Life Expectancy in Successive Birth Cohorts of Older Cancer Survivors: A Longitudinal Modeling Analysis of the US Health and Retirement Study.

Authors:  Collin F Payne; Lindsay C Kobayashi
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 3.  Mutation or not, what directly establishes a neoplastic state, namely cellular immortality and autonomy, still remains unknown and should be prioritized in our research.

Authors:  Shengming Zhu; Jiangang Wang; Lucas Zellmer; Ningzhi Xu; Mei Liu; Yun Hu; Hong Ma; Fei Deng; Wenxiu Yang; Dezhong Joshua Liao
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.478

4.  Transcriptomic alterations during ageing reflect the shift from cancer to degenerative diseases in the elderly.

Authors:  Peer Aramillo Irizar; Sascha Schäuble; Daniela Esser; Marco Groth; Christiane Frahm; Steffen Priebe; Mario Baumgart; Nils Hartmann; Shiva Marthandan; Uwe Menzel; Jule Müller; Silvio Schmidt; Volker Ast; Amke Caliebe; Rainer König; Michael Krawczak; Michael Ristow; Stefan Schuster; Alessandro Cellerino; Stephan Diekmann; Christoph Englert; Peter Hemmerich; Jürgen Sühnel; Reinhard Guthke; Otto W Witte; Matthias Platzer; Eytan Ruppin; Christoph Kaleta
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Time trends and future prediction of coal worker's pneumoconiosis in opencast coal mine in China based on the APC model.

Authors:  Yuting Li; Wei Xian; Haodi Xu; Jinbin Sun; Bing Han; Hongbo Liu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Profound synchrony of age-specific incidence rates and tumor suppression for different cancer types as revealed by the multistage-senescence model of carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Richard B Richardson; Catalina V Anghel; Dennis S Deng
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 5.682

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.