Literature DB >> 11131181

Objective comparison of image quality and dose between conventional and synchrotron radiation mammography.

R Moeckli1, F R Verdun, S Fiedler, M Pachoud, P Schnyder, J F Valley.   

Abstract

The shape of the energy spectrum produced by an x-ray tube has a great importance in mammography. Many anode-filtration combinations have been proposed to obtain the most effective spectrum shape for the image quality-dose relationship. On the other hand, third generation synchrotrons such as the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility in Grenoble are able to produce a high flux of monoenergetic radiation. It is thus a powerful tool to study the effect of beam energy on image quality and dose in mammography. An objective method was used to evaluate image quality and dose in mammography with synchrotron radiation and to compare them to standard conventional units. It was performed systematically in the energy range of interest for mammography through the evaluation of a global image quality index and through the measurement of the mean glandular dose. Compared to conventional mammography units, synchrotron radiation shows a great improvement of the image quality-dose relationship, which is due to the beam monochromaticity and to the high intrinsic collimation of the beam, which allows the use of a slit instead of an anti-scatter grid for scatter rejection.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11131181     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/12/301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

1.  Near monochromatic X-rays for digital slot-scan mammography: initial findings.

Authors:  Felix Diekmann; S Diekmann; K Richter; U Bick; T Fischer; R Lawaczeck; W-R Press; K Schön; H-J Weinmann; V Arkadiev; A Bjeoumikhov; N Langhoff; J Rabe; P Roth; J Tilgner; R Wedell; M Krumrey; U Linke; G Ulm; B Hamm
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Multimodal hard X-ray imaging of a mammography phantom at a compact synchrotron light source.

Authors:  Simone Schleede; Martin Bech; Klaus Achterhold; Guillaume Potdevin; Martin Gifford; Rod Loewen; Cecile Limborg; Ronald Ruth; Franz Pfeiffer
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.616

Review 3.  [Application of brilliant x-rays in mammography. Development and perspectives of phase contrast techniques].

Authors:  T Schneider; P Coan; D Habs; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Objective measurements of image quality in synchrotron radiation phase-contrast imaging versus digital mammography.

Authors:  Y Ruiz-Gonzalez; M Perez-Diaz; D Martínez-Aguila; M Diaz-Barreto; I Fleitas; R Mora-Machado; L Rigon; G Tromba; P Bregant
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  A proposal for a quality control protocol in breast CT with synchrotron radiation.

Authors:  Adriano Contillo; Anna Veronese; Luca Brombal; Sandro Donato; Luigi Rigon; Angelo Taibi; Giuliana Tromba; Renata Longo; Fulvia Arfelli
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Phantom-Based Feasibility Studies on Phase-Contrast Mammography at Indian Synchrotron Facility Indus-2.

Authors:  Reena Sharma; S D Sharma; P S Sarkar; B Singh; A K Agrawal; D Datta
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.