Literature DB >> 11130808

Heritability of self-reported health.

J C Romeis1, J F Scherrer, H Xian, S A Eisen, K Bucholz, A C Heath, J Goldberg, M J Lyons, W G Henderson, W R True.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the contribution of genes and environmental factors to variation in a common measure (i.e., a five-point--excellent, very good, good, fair, and poor--Likert scale) of self-reported health. DATA SOURCES: Data were analyzed from 4,638 male-male twin pair members of the Vietnam Era Twin (VET) Registry who responded to a 1987 health survey. STUDY
DESIGN: Varying models for the relationship between genetic and environmental influences on self-reported health were tested in an attempt to explain the relative contributions of additive genetic, shared and nonshared environmental effects, and health conditions reported since 1975 to perceived health status. DATA COLLECTION: A mail and telephone survey of health was administered in 1987 to VET Registry twins. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Variance component estimates under the best-fitting model included a 39.6 percent genetic contribution to self-reported health. In a model which included the effect of health condition, genes accounted for 32.5 percent and health condition accounted for 15.0 percent of the variance in self-reported health. The magnitude of the genetic contribution to perceived health status was not significantly different in a model with or without health condition.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest over one-third of the variability of self-reported health can be attributed to genes. Since perceived health status is a major predictor of morbidity, mortality, and health services utilization, future analyses should consider the role of heritable influences on traditional health services variables.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11130808      PMCID: PMC1089180     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  26 in total

1.  Age differences in genetic and environmental influences for health from the Swedish Adoption/Twin Study of Aging.

Authors:  J R Harris; N L Pedersen; G E McClearn; R Plomin; J R Nesselroade
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1992-05

2.  Determinants of perceived health status of medical outpatients.

Authors:  A J Barsky; P D Cleary; G L Klerman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 4.  Recent developments and future issues in the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings.

Authors:  S Greenfield; E C Nelson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Determining zygosity in the Vietnam Era Twin Registry: an approach using questionnaires.

Authors:  S Eisen; R Neuman; J Goldberg; J Rice; W True
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  The Vietnam Era Twin (VET) Registry: method of construction.

Authors:  S Eisen; W True; J Goldberg; W Henderson; C D Robinette
Journal:  Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma)       Date:  1987

7.  Socioeconomic status and physical health, how are they related? An empirical study based on twins reared apart and twins reared together.

Authors:  P Lichtenstein; J R Harris; N L Pedersen; G E McClearn
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey.

Authors:  C A McHorney; M Kosinski; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Determinants of self-reported health status in ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  A Hidding; L de Witte; S van der Linden
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.666

10.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs.

Authors:  C A McHorney; J E Ware; A E Raczek
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  25 in total

1.  Genetic and Environmental Overlap Between Childhood Maltreatment and Adult Physical Health.

Authors:  Susan C South; Markus H Schafer; Kenneth F Ferraro
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.587

2.  Association between single-nucleotide polymorphisms in growth factor genes and quality of life in men with prostate cancer and the general population.

Authors:  Kimberly E Alexander; Suzanne Chambers; Amanda B Spurdle; Jyotsna Batra; Felicity Lose; Tracy A O'Mara; Robert A Gardiner; Joanne F Aitken; Judith A Clements; Mary-Anne Kedda; Monika Janda
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Early trauma and inflammation: role of familial factors in a study of twins.

Authors:  Cherie Rooks; Emir Veledar; Jack Goldberg; J Douglas Bremner; Viola Vaccarino
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 4.312

4.  Interactions between life stress factors and carrying the APOE4 allele adversely impact self-reported health in old adults.

Authors:  Yi Zeng; Claude L Hughes; Megan A Lewis; Jianxin Li; Fengyu Zhang
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 6.053

5.  Genetic variation in health insurance coverage.

Authors:  George L Wehby; Dan Shane
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2018-11-12

6.  Prevention, Use of Health Services, and Genes: Implications of Genetics for Policy Formation.

Authors:  George L Wehby; Benjamin W Domingue; Jason D Boardman
Journal:  J Policy Anal Manage       Date:  2015

7.  A genome-wide association study of self-rated health.

Authors:  Miriam A Mosing; Karin J H Verweij; Sarah E Medland; Jodie Painter; Scott D Gordon; Andrew C Heath; Pamela A Madden; Grant W Montgomery; Nicholas G Martin
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.587

Review 8.  Conceptual and Analytical Considerations toward the Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Demissie Alemayehu; Joseph C Cappelleri
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2012-07

9.  The establishment of the GENEQOL consortium to investigate the genetic disposition of patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes.

Authors:  Mirjam A G Sprangers; Jeff A Sloan; Ruut Veenhoven; Charles S Cleeland; Michele Y Halyard; Amy P Abertnethy; Frank Baas; Andrea M Barsevick; Meike Bartels; Dorret I Boomsma; Cynthia Chauhan; Amylou C Dueck; Marlene H Frost; Per Hall; Pål Klepstad; Nicholas G Martin; Christine Miaskowski; Miriam Mosing; Benjamin Movsas; Cornelis J F Van Noorden; Donald L Patrick; Nancy L Pedersen; Mary E Ropka; Quiling Shi; Gen Shinozaki; Jasvinder A Singh; Ping Yang; Ailko H Zwinderman
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.587

Review 10.  Reflections on changeability versus stability of health-related quality of life: distinguishing between its environmental and genetic components.

Authors:  Mirjam A G Sprangers; Carolyn E Schwartz
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2008-11-02       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.