Literature DB >> 11129845

Consumerism in prenatal diagnosis: a challenge for ethical guidelines.

W Henn1.   

Abstract

The ethical guidelines for prenatal diagnosis proposed by the World Health Organisation (WHO), as well as by national regulations, only refer to paternity and gender of the fetus as unacceptable, disease-unrelated criteria for prenatal selection, as no other such parameters are at hand so far. This perspective is too narrow because research on complex genetic systems such as cognition and ageing is about to provide clinically applicable tests for genetic constituents of potentially desirable properties such as intelligence or longevity which could be misused as parameters for prenatal diagnosis. Moreover, there is an increasing number of prenatally testable genetic traits, such as heritable deafness, which are generally regarded as pathological but desired by some prospective parents and taken into account as parameters for pro-disability selection. To protect prenatal diagnosis from ethically unacceptable genetic consumerism, guidelines must be clarified as soon as possible and updated towards a worldwide restriction of prenatal genetic testing to immediately disease-determining traits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11129845      PMCID: PMC1733311          DOI: 10.1136/jme.26.6.444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  21 in total

1.  Genetics and general cognitive ability.

Authors:  R Plomin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-12-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The choice to have a disabled child.

Authors:  S Michie; T M Marteau
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  The ACE gene and muscle performance.

Authors:  A G Williams; M P Rayson; M Jubb; M World; D R Woods; M Hayward; J Martin; S E Humphries; H E Montgomery
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Policy forum: genetic technologies. Commercialization of genetic research and public policy.

Authors:  B M Knoppers; M Hirtle; K C Glass
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-12-17       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Genome analysis with gene expression microarrays.

Authors:  M Schena
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.345

6.  China's genetic services providers' attitudes towards several ethical issues: a cross-cultural survey.

Authors:  X Mao; D C Wertz
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.438

7.  The p66shc adaptor protein controls oxidative stress response and life span in mammals.

Authors:  E Migliaccio; M Giorgio; S Mele; G Pelicci; P Reboldi; P P Pandolfi; L Lanfrancone; P G Pelicci
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-11-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Attitudes of young adults to prenatal screening and genetic correction for human attributes and psychiatric conditions.

Authors:  K K Milner; E E Collins; G R Connors; E M Petty
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1998-03-05

9.  Ethical and social issues in prenatal sex selection: a survey of geneticists in 37 nations.

Authors:  D C Wertz; J C Fletcher
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  The issue of sex selection in Turkey.

Authors:  C Kalaça; A Akin
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  3 in total

1.  Is there a Role for Genetic Counselors in Prenatal Paternity Testing? - an Assessment Based on Audit of 13 years of Clinical Experience in South Australia.

Authors:  Kate E Riley; Hayley Salvemini; Eric Haan; Lara Fitzgerald; Kirsty Stallard; Sarah Borrie; Electra Pontikinas; Anne Baxendale
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  The fetus in the age of the genome.

Authors:  Dagmar Schmitz; Wolfram Henn
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 5.881

3.  Decision-making about reproductive choices among individuals at-risk for Huntington's disease.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman; Deborah Thorne; Jennifer Williamson; Wendy Chung; Karen Marder
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.717

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.