Literature DB >> 9511972

Attitudes of young adults to prenatal screening and genetic correction for human attributes and psychiatric conditions.

K K Milner1, E E Collins, G R Connors, E M Petty.   

Abstract

With recent advances in DNA technology, questions have arisen as to how this technology should be appropriately used. In this article, results obtained from a survey designed to elicit attitudes of college students to prenatal testing and gene therapy for human attributes and psychiatric conditions are reported. The eleven hypothetical disease phenotypes included schizophrenia, alcoholism, tendency toward violent behavior, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, depression requiring medical treatment, obesity, involvement in "dangerous" sports activities, homosexuality, borderline normal IQ (80-100), proportional short stature, and inability to detect perfect pitch. Most students supported prenatal genetic testing for psychiatric disorders and behavior that might result in harm to others (i.e., tendency towards violent behavior) and found prenatal genetic testing for human attributes less desirable. However, the lack of unilateral agreement or disagreement toward any one condition or attribute suggests the potential difficulties ahead in the quest for guidelines for the application of new technologies available to manipulate the human genome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9511972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  6 in total

1.  Consumerism in prenatal diagnosis: a challenge for ethical guidelines.

Authors:  W Henn
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  The choice to have a disabled child.

Authors:  S Michie; T M Marteau
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  Ethics and neuropsychiatric genetics: a review of major issues.

Authors:  Steven K Hoge; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 5.176

4.  Consumers' desire towards current and prospective reproductive genetic testing.

Authors:  Feighanne Hathaway; Esther Burns; Harry Ostrer
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Public perspectives on the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  William D Winkelman; Stacey A Missmer; Dale Myers; Elizabeth S Ginsburg
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Decisions about testing and termination of pregnancy for different fetal conditions: a qualitative study of European White and Pakistani mothers of affected children.

Authors:  Shenaz Ahmed; Jenny Hewison; Josephine M Green; Howard S Cuckle; Janet Hirst; Jim G Thornton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 2.537

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.