Literature DB >> 11129370

Spatiotemporal distribution of facilitation and inhibition of return arising from the reflexive orienting of covert attention.

A Collie1, P Maruff, M Yucel, J Danckert, J Currie.   

Abstract

Currently, there is debate regarding both the spatial and temporal relationship between facilitation and inhibition of return (IOR) components of attention, as observed on the covert orienting of visual attention task (COVAT). These issues were addressed in a series of experiments where the spatial and temporal relationships between cue and target were manipulated. Facilitation occurred only when the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) was short and there was temporal overlap between cue and target. IOR occurred only when SOA was long and there was no temporal overlap between cue and target. Facilitation encompassed the cued location and all locations between the cue and fixation, whereas IOR arose for the entire cued hemifield. These findings suggest that the facilitation and IOR found on COVATs that use noninformative peripheral cues are separable and stimulus-driven processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11129370     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.26.6.1733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  23 in total

1.  Examining the time course of facilitation and inhibition with simultaneous onset and offset cues.

Authors:  Jay Pratt; Marnie Hirshhorn
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-02-19

2.  Inhibition of return and the human frontal eye fields.

Authors:  Tony Ro; Alessandro Farnè; Erik Chang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The role of temporal and spatial factors in the covert orienting of visual attention tasks.

Authors:  Jim McAuliffe; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-07-03

4.  Inhibition of return: a graphical meta-analysis of its time course and an empirical test of its temporal and spatial properties.

Authors:  Arthur G Samuel; Donna Kat
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

5.  Spatial orienting of attention simultaneously cued by automatic social and nonsocial cues.

Authors:  Deanna J Greene; Eran Zaidel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Directed forgetting shares mechanisms with attentional withdrawal but not with stop-signal inhibition.

Authors:  Jonathan M Fawcett; Tracy L Taylor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-09

7.  Two spatially separated attention systems in the visual field: evidence from inhibition of return.

Authors:  Yan Bao; Ernst Pöppel
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-03

8.  Automatic, stimulus-driven attentional capture by objecthood.

Authors:  Ruth Kimchi; Yaffa Yeshurun; Aliza Cohen-Savransky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-02

Review 9.  Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences.

Authors:  Alexandra Frischen; Andrew P Bayliss; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Disentangling perceptual and motor components in inhibition of return.

Authors:  Bin Zhou
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2008-03-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.