Literature DB >> 11129138

SPECT attenuation artifacts in normal and overweight persons: insights from a retrospective comparison of Rb-82 positron emission tomography and TI-201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

N Freedman1, D Schechter, M Klein, R Marciano, Y Rozenman, R Chisin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Myocardial perfusion imaging can be performed using SPECT or positron emission tomography (PET). SPECT has lower specificity than PET, largely as a result of attenuation artifacts; however, it is more widely available. The authors describe a study of the effect of sex and body weight on the incidence of SPECT attenuation artifacts using a retrospective comparison of TI-201 SPECT and Rb PET.
METHODS: One hundred sixty-one persons (101 men, 60 women; 81 normal weight, 80 overweight) underwent TI-201 SPECT and Rb PET. The incidence of observed perfusion defects was studied in territories of the three major coronary arteries. SPECT and PET results were also compared with those of angiography in a subset of 75 patients.
RESULTS: One hundred fourteen defects were reported on Rb PET compared with 176 defects with TI-201 SPECT. Excess TI-201 SPECT defects occurred in male and female, normal-weight and overweight persons. The average specificity was 64% for TI-201 SPECT and 84% for Rb PET, reflecting this difference.
CONCLUSIONS: Attenuation artifacts in TI-201 SPECT occur frequently and are not confined to easily identifiable subgroups of patients. Therefore, measures to improve specificity of SPECT (e.g., prone or gated imaging) or alternative imaging techniques such as PET have potential advantages for everyone, not simply for obese patients and women with large breasts. In addition, awareness of the prevalence of SPECT attenuation artifacts, in both sexes and all weight categories, may contribute to improved accuracy of interpretation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11129138     DOI: 10.1097/00003072-200012000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0363-9762            Impact factor:   7.794


  13 in total

1.  One size fits all?

Authors:  Robert C Hendel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Assessment of myocardial ischemia with cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Bobak Heydari; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.194

3.  Value of attenuation correction on ECG-gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging related to body mass index.

Authors:  Randall C Thompson; Gary V Heller; Lynne L Johnson; James A Case; S James Cullom; Ernest V Garcia; Philip G Jones; Kelly L Moutray; Timothy M Bateman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Investigation of emission-transmission misalignment artifacts on rubidium-82 cardiac PET with adenosine pharmacologic stress.

Authors:  David M Schuster; Raghuveer K Halkar; Fabio P Esteves; Ernest V Garcia; C David Cooke; Mushabbar A Syed; F DuBois Bowman; John R Votaw
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of gated Tc-99m sestamibi stress myocardial perfusion SPECT with combined supine and prone acquisitions to detect coronary artery disease in obese and nonobese patients.

Authors:  Daniel S Berman; Xingping Kang; Hidetaka Nishina; Piotr J Slomka; Leslee J Shaw; Sean W Hayes; Ishac Cohen; John D Friedman; James Gerlach; Guido Germano
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  The effect of time-of-flight and point spread function modeling on 82Rb myocardial perfusion imaging of obese patients.

Authors:  Paul K R Dasari; Judson P Jones; Michael E Casey; Yuanyuan Liang; Vasken Dilsizian; Mark F Smith
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Independent and incremental prognostic value of left ventricular ejection fraction determined by stress gated rubidium 82 PET imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Kirkeith Lertsburapa; Alan W Ahlberg; Timothy M Bateman; Deborah Katten; Lyndy Volker; S James Cullom; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Usefulness of an accelerated transoesophageal stress echocardiography in the preoperative evaluation of high risk severely obese subjects awaiting bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Sylvie Legault; Mario Sénéchal; Sébastien Bergeron; Marie Arsenault; Michel Tessier; Jean Guimond; Paul Poirier
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 2.062

Review 9.  Challenges in cardiac risk assessment in bariatric surgery patients.

Authors:  David Gugliotti; Paul Grant; Wael Jaber; Loutfi Aboussouan; Charles Bae; Daniel Sessler; Philip Scahuer; Roop Kaw
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Prediction of cardiac events in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction with dobutamine cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of wall motion score index.

Authors:  Erica Dall'Armellina; Timothy M Morgan; Sangeeta Mandapaka; William Ntim; J Jeffrey Carr; Craig A Hamilton; John Hoyle; Hollins Clark; Paige Clark; Kerry M Link; Doug Case; W Gregory Hundley
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.