Literature DB >> 11114171

Polarity of transcriptional enhancement revealed by an insulator element.

W Wei1, M D Brennan.   

Abstract

Transcriptional enhancers for genes transcribed by RNA polymerase II may be localized upstream or downstream of the stimulated promoter in their normal chromosomal context. They stimulate transcription in an orientation-independent manner when assayed on circular plasmids. We describe a transient transformation system to evaluate the orientation preference of transcriptional enhancers in Drosophila. To accomplish this, the gypsy insulator element was used to block bidirectional action of an enhancer on circular plasmids. In this system, as in the chromosome, blocking of enhancer activity requires wild-type levels of the su(Hw) protein. We evaluated the orientation preference for the relatively large (4.4 kb) Adh larval enhancer from Drosophila melanogaster, used in conjunction with a luciferase reporter gene under the control of a minimal Adh promoter. An orientation preference was revealed by insertion of a single copy of the insulator between the enhancer and the promoter. This orientation effect was greatly amplified when the promoter was weakened by removing binding sites for critical transcription factors, consistent with a mechanism of insulator action in which the insulator intercepts signals from the enhancer by competing with the promoter. The orientation preference, as much as 100-fold, is a property of the enhancer itself because it is displayed by gene constructions introduced into the chromosome regardless of the presence of the insulator in a distal location. These findings are most easily reconciled with a facilitated tracking mechanism for enhancer function in a native chromosomal environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11114171      PMCID: PMC18951          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.011529598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  61 in total

1.  The suppressor of Hairy-wing binding region is required for gypsy mutagenesis.

Authors:  P A Smith; V G Corces
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1992-05

2.  Multiple cis-acting sequences contribute to evolved regulatory variation for Drosophila Adh genes.

Authors:  X M Fang; M D Brennan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  The role of insulator elements in defining domains of gene expression.

Authors:  P K Geyer
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.578

4.  An enhancer stimulates transcription in trans when attached to the promoter via a protein bridge.

Authors:  H P Müeller-Storm; J M Sogo; W Schaffner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-08-25       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Transposition of cloned P elements into Drosophila germ line chromosomes.

Authors:  A C Spradling; G M Rubin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-10-22       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Beta-globin gene switching and DNase I sensitivity of the endogenous beta-globin locus in mice do not require the locus control region.

Authors:  M A Bender; M Bulger; J Close; M Groudine
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Redundant cis-acting elements control expression of the Drosophila affinidisjuncta Adh gene in the larval fat body.

Authors:  R W McKenzie; J Hu; M D Brennan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-04-11       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Repression of hsp70 heat shock gene transcription by the suppressor of hairy-wing protein of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  C Holdridge; D Dorsett
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Transvection in the Drosophila Abd-B domain: extensive upstream sequences are involved in anchoring distant cis-regulatory regions to the promoter.

Authors:  L Sipos; J Mihály; F Karch; P Schedl; J Gausz; H Gyurkovics
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  A leucine zipper domain of the suppressor of Hairy-wing protein mediates its repressive effect on enhancer function.

Authors:  D A Harrison; D A Gdula; R S Coyne; V G Corces
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  7 in total

1.  Study of long-distance functional interactions between Su(Hw) insulators that can regulate enhancer-promoter communication in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Ekaterina Savitskaya; Larisa Melnikova; Margarita Kostuchenko; Elena Kravchenko; Ekaterina Pomerantseva; Tatiana Boikova; Darya Chetverina; Aleksander Parshikov; Polyna Zobacheva; Elena Gracheva; Alexander Galkin; Pavel Georgiev
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Rationally designed insulator-like elements can block enhancer action in vitro.

Authors:  Vladimir A Bondarenko; Yong I Jiang; Vasily M Studitsky
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  The gypsy insulator can act as a promoter-specific transcriptional stimulator.

Authors:  W Wei; M D Brennan
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Alpha beta T-cell development is not affected by inversion of TCR beta gene enhancer sequences: polar enhancement of gene expression regardless of enhancer orientation.

Authors:  Fang Huang; Olivier Cabaud; Christophe Verthuy; Anne-Odile Hueber; Pierre Ferrier
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.397

5.  A test of insulator interactions in Drosophila.

Authors:  Emily J Kuhn; Michaela M Viering; Katherine M Rhodes; Pamela K Geyer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Efficient inversions and duplications of mammalian regulatory DNA elements and gene clusters by CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  Jinhuan Li; Jia Shou; Ya Guo; Yuanxiao Tang; Yonghu Wu; Zhilian Jia; Yanan Zhai; Zhifeng Chen; Quan Xu; Qiang Wu
Journal:  J Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 6.216

7.  Comparative genomics reveals functional transcriptional control sequences in the Prop1 gene.

Authors:  Robert D Ward; Shannon W Davis; Minchul Cho; Constance Esposito; Robert H Lyons; Jan-Fang Cheng; Edward M Rubin; Simon J Rhodes; Lori T Raetzman; Timothy P L Smith; Sally A Camper
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 2.957

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.