Literature DB >> 11113747

Performance of a neural network in detecting prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen reflex range of 2.5 to 4.0 ng/mL.

R J Babaian1, H Fritsche, A Ayala, V Bhadkamkar, D A Johnston, W Naccarato, Z Zhang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore the potential role of a neural network-derived algorithm in enhancing the specificity of prostate cancer detection compared with the determination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and free PSA (fPSA) while maintaining a 90% detection rate. Recent information suggests that the incidence of detectable prostate cancer is similar in men whose PSA values range from 2.5 to 4.0 ng/mL and from 4.0 to 10.0 ng/mL. If the PSA threshold triggering a prostate biopsy is lowered to 2.5 ng/mL, approximately 13% of men older than 50 would be added to the patient biopsy pool.
METHODS: One hundred fifty-one men were enrolled in a prospective, Institutional Review Board-approved protocol to evaluate the incidence of cancer in a population of men who participated in an early-detection program and whose PSA level was between 2.5 and 4.0 ng/mL. All the men underwent biopsy using an 11-core multisite-directed biopsy scheme, and all biopsy specimens were examined by one pathologist. All men had a second blood specimen drawn before the biopsy for a determination of serum PSA, creatinine kinase, prostatic acid phosphatase, and fPSA. A new neural network algorithm was developed with PSA, creatinine kinase, prostatic acid phosphatase, fPSA, and age as input variables to produce a single-valued prostate cancer detection index (PCD-I). This new algorithm was then prospectively tested in the 151 men. Performance parameters (including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and biopsies saved) were calculated, and a comparative analysis was performed to evaluate the differences among the new algorithm, percent fPSA, PSA density, and PSA density-transition zone.
RESULTS: Cancer was histologically confirmed in 24.5% (37 of 151) of the men. The median age of the men was 62 years (range 43 to 74). At a sensitivity of 92%, the specificity for percent fPSA was 11%. The new algorithm (PCD-I) demonstrated an additional enhancement of specificity to 62% at 92% sensitivity. Clinically, the PCD-I would result in a savings of 49% (74 of 151) of all biopsies or 63.6% (71 of 114) of all unnecessary biopsies.
CONCLUSIONS: A new generation algorithm, derived from a neural network (PCD-I) incorporating the parameters of age, creatinine kinase, PSA, prostatic acid phosphatase, and fPSA can significantly enhance the specificity and reduce the number of biopsies while maintaining a 92% sensitivity rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11113747     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00830-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  16 in total

1.  Artificial neural networks for decision-making in urologic oncology.

Authors:  Theodore Anagnostou; Mesut Remzi; Bob Djavan
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

2.  The value of an artificial neural network in the decision-making for prostate biopsies.

Authors:  R P Meijer; E F A Gemen; I E W van Onna; J C van der Linden; H P Beerlage; G C M Kusters
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Artificial neural networks and prostate cancer--tools for diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Xinhai Hu; Henning Cammann; Hellmuth-A Meyer; Kurt Miller; Klaus Jung; Carsten Stephan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Pre-operative prediction of advanced prostatic cancer using clinical decision support systems: accuracy comparison between support vector machine and artificial neural network.

Authors:  Sang Youn Kim; Sung Kyoung Moon; Dae Chul Jung; Sung Il Hwang; Chang Kyu Sung; Jeong Yeon Cho; Seung Hyup Kim; Jiwon Lee; Hak Jong Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 5.  [Value of biomarkers in urology].

Authors:  P J Goebell; B Keck; S Wach; B Wullich
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Assay-specific artificial neural networks for five different PSA assays and populations with PSA 2-10 ng/ml in 4,480 men.

Authors:  Carsten Stephan; Chuanliang Xu; Henning Cammann; Markus Graefen; Alexander Haese; Hartwig Huland; Axel Semjonow; Eleftherios P Diamandis; Mesut Remzi; Bob Djavan; Mark F Wildhagen; Bert G Blijenberg; Patrik Finne; Ulf-Hakan Stenman; Klaus Jung; Hellmuth-Alexander Meyer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Image-based clinical decision support for transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: comparison of multiple logistic regression, artificial neural network, and support vector machine.

Authors:  Hak Jong Lee; Sung Il Hwang; Seok-Min Han; Seong Ho Park; Seung Hyup Kim; Jeong Yeon Cho; Chang Gyu Seong; Gheeyoung Choe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  [An artificial neural network as a tool in risk evaluation of prostate cancer. Indication for biopsy with the PSA range of 2-20 microg/l].

Authors:  C Stephan; B Vogel; H Cammann; M Lein; V Klevecka; P Sinha; G Kristiansen; D Schnorr; K Jung; S A Loening
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Characteristics and outcome of prostate cancer with PSA <4 ng/ml at diagnosis: a population-based study.

Authors:  M Bonet; A Merglen; G Fioretta; E Rapiti; I Neyroud-Caspar; R Zanetti; R Miralbell; C Bouchardy
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.405

10.  A systematic review of the applications of Expert Systems (ES) and machine learning (ML) in clinical urology.

Authors:  Hesham Salem; Daniele Soria; Jonathan N Lund; Amir Awwad
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.