Literature DB >> 11111136

Exploitation of an ancient escape circuit by an avian predator: prey sensitivity to model predator display in the field.

P G Jabloński1, N J Strausfeld.   

Abstract

Certain insectivorous birds, such as the painted redstart (Myioborus pictus), undertake flush pursuit--a characteristic display that elicits an escape reaction by an insect, which the bird then chases in the air and eats. This account describes experiments showing that flush pursuit uses visual displays, which are likely to exploit an ancient neural circuit in dipteran insects, the visual systems of which are well documented as detecting looming stimuli and triggering an escape responses. Using models that decompose components of the redstart display, specific elements of the display were analyzed for their contribution in triggering visually induced escape behavior by dipterous insects. Elements tested were pivoting body movements, patterning on the spread tail and wings, and visual contrast of model redstarts against pale and dark backgrounds. We show that contrasting patterns within the plumage are crucial to foraging success, as is contrast of the bird against a background. Visual motion also significantly contributes to the successful flushing. In contrast, unpatterned models and patterned models that do not contrast with the background are less successful in eliciting escape responses of flies. Natural visual stimuli provided by Myioborus pictus are similar to those known to trigger looming and time-to-collision neurons in the escape circuits of flies and other insects, such as orthopterans. We propose that the tuning properties of these neural pathways might have contributed to the evolution of foraging displays in flush-pursuing birds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11111136     DOI: 10.1159/000006680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Evol        ISSN: 0006-8977            Impact factor:   1.808


  10 in total

1.  When hawks attack: animal-borne video studies of goshawk pursuit and prey-evasion strategies.

Authors:  Suzanne Amador Kane; Andrew H Fulton; Lee J Rosenthal
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 2.  The neurobiology and behavior of the American water shrew (Sorex palustris).

Authors:  Kenneth C Catania
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Water shrews detect movement, shape, and smell to find prey underwater.

Authors:  Kenneth C Catania; James F Hare; Kevin L Campbell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE ON AGGRESSIVE MIMICRY.

Authors:  Robert R Jackson; Fiona R Cross
Journal:  J Zool (1987)       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 2.322

Review 5.  Towards a scientific concept of free will as a biological trait: spontaneous actions and decision-making in invertebrates.

Authors:  Björn Brembs
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  An alternative theoretical approach to escape decision-making: the role of visual cues.

Authors:  Veronika Javůrková; Arnošt Leoš Šizling; Jakub Kreisinger; Tomáš Albrecht
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Ecological niche partitioning in a fragmented landscape between two highly specialized avian flush-pursuit foragers in the Andean zone of sympatry.

Authors:  Piotr G Jablonski; Marta Borowiec; Jacek J Nowakowski; Tadeusz Stawarczyk
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Collective action or individual choice: Spontaneity and individuality contribute to decision-making in Drosophila.

Authors:  Isabelle Steymans; Luciana M Pujol-Lereis; Björn Brembs; E Axel Gorostiza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Direct look from a predator shortens the risk-assessment time by prey.

Authors:  Sang-im Lee; Soyun Hwang; Young-eun Joe; Hyun-kyung Cha; Gun-ho Joo; Hyeon-jeong Lee; Ji-won Kim; Piotr G Jablonski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Worm grunting, fiddling, and charming--humans unknowingly mimic a predator to harvest bait.

Authors:  Kenneth C Catania
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.