Literature DB >> 23976823

A COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE ON AGGRESSIVE MIMICRY.

Robert R Jackson1, Fiona R Cross.   

Abstract

We use the term 'aggressive mimic' for predators that communicate with their prey by making signals to indirectly manipulate prey behaviour. For understanding why the aggressive mimic's signals work, it is important to appreciate that these signals interface with the prey's perceptual system, and that the aggressive mimic can be envisaged as playing mind games with its prey. Examples of aggressive mimicry vary from instances in which specifying a model is straight forward to instances where a concise characterisation of the model is difficult. However, the less straightforward examples of aggressive mimicry may be the more interesting examples in the context of animal cognition. In particular, there are spiders that prey on other spiders by entering their prey's web and making signals. Web invasion brings about especially intimate contact with their prey's perceptual system because the prey spider's web is an important component of the prey spider's sensory apparatus. For the web-invading spider, often there is also a large element of risk when practising aggressive mimicry because the intended prey is also a potential predator. This element of risk, combined with exceptionally intimate interfacing with prey perceptual systems, may have favoured the web-invading aggressive mimic's strategy becoming strikingly cognitive in character. Yet a high level of flexibility may be widespread among aggressive mimics in general and, on the whole, we propose that research on aggressive mimicry holds exceptional potential for advancing our understanding of animal cognition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Communication; categorisation; information; perceptual systems; representation; sensory exploitation; signals

Year:  2013        PMID: 23976823      PMCID: PMC3748996          DOI: 10.1111/jzo.12036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Zool (1987)        ISSN: 0952-8369            Impact factor:   2.322


  25 in total

1.  Mental imagery: against the nihilistic hypothesis.

Authors:  Stephen M. Kosslyn; Giorgio Ganis; William L. Thompson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  In defense of representation.

Authors:  A B Markman; E Dietrich
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Assassin bug uses aggressive mimicry to lure spider prey.

Authors:  Anne E Wignall; Phillip W Taylor
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain.

Authors:  B R Postle
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Chemical mimicry: bolas spiders emit components of moth prey species sex pheromones.

Authors:  M K Stowe; J H Tumlinson; R R Heath
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-05-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Deception in plants: mimicry or perceptual exploitation?

Authors:  H Martin Schaefer; Graeme D Ruxton
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection.

Authors:  J A Endler; A L Basolo
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 8.  The brain's visual world: representation of visual targets in cerebral cortex.

Authors:  J H Maunsell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-11-03       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Orangutans modify their gestural signaling according to their audience's comprehension.

Authors:  Erica A Cartmill; Richard W Byrne
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 10.  Honey bees as a model for vision, perception, and cognition.

Authors:  Mandyam V Srinivasan
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 19.686

View more
  11 in total

1.  Solving a novel confinement problem by spartaeine salticids that are predisposed to solve problems in the context of predation.

Authors:  Fiona R Cross; Robert R Jackson
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Preys' exploitation of predators' fear: when the caterpillar plays the Gruffalo.

Authors:  Sergio Castellano; Paolo Cermelli
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Representation of different exact numbers of prey by a spider-eating predator.

Authors:  Fiona R Cross; Robert R Jackson
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Using invertebrate model organisms for neuroscience research and training: an opportunity for Africa.

Authors:  Wasiu Gbolahan Balogun; Ansa Emmanuel Cobham; Abdulbasit Amin; Azman Seeni
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.584

5.  Ontogenetic shift in plant-related cognitive specialization by a mosquito-eating predator.

Authors:  Georgina E Carvell; Robert R Jackson; Fiona R Cross
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  The execution of planned detours by spider-eating predators.

Authors:  Fiona R Cross; Robert R Jackson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Fenestration: a window of opportunity for carnivorous plants.

Authors:  H Martin Schaefer; Graeme D Ruxton
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Tail movements by late-term fetal pitvipers resemble caudal luring: prenatal development of an ambush predatory behaviour.

Authors:  Charles F Smith; Gordon W Schuett
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.653

9.  Intricate predatory decisions by a mosquito-specialist spider from Malaysia.

Authors:  Robert R Jackson; Daiqin Li; Jeremy R W Woon; Rosli Hashim; Fiona R Cross
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Small-molecule mimicry hunting strategy in the imperial cone snail, Conus imperialis.

Authors:  Joshua P Torres; Zhenjian Lin; Maren Watkins; Paula Flórez Salcedo; Robert P Baskin; Shireen Elhabian; Helena Safavi-Hemami; Dylan Taylor; Jortan Tun; Gisela P Concepcion; Noel Saguil; Angel A Yanagihara; Yixin Fang; Jeffrey R McArthur; Han-Shen Tae; Rocio K Finol-Urdaneta; B Duygu Özpolat; Baldomero M Olivera; Eric W Schmidt
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.