Literature DB >> 11108371

Effects of hearing impairment and presentation level on masking period patterns for Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes.

V Summers1.   

Abstract

Masking period patterns (MPPs) for Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes containing equal-amplitude harmonics of a 100-Hz fundamental were determined for 5-ms tonal probes at 4,000 and 1,000 Hz. Maskers consisted of harmonics 2-50 (200-5,000 Hz bandwidth) for 4,000-Hz probes and harmonics 2-20 (200-2,000 Hz) for 1,000-Hz signals. Masked thresholds were determined for probe onsets 153, 155.5, 158, 160.5, and 163 ms following masker onset (masker duration=460 ms). Overall, results were similar for both probe frequencies. For listeners with normal hearing, MPPs for positive Schroeder-phase complexes masking 60 dB SPL probes were highly modulated and became flatter when probe level was increased to 80 dB SPL. MPPs were less modulated for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss than for normally hearing listeners at both 60 and 80 dB SPL probe levels. Thresholds in negative Schroeder-phase maskers were more similar across the two groups of listeners and across differences in probe position and probe level. The findings support an interpretation involving differences in the shape of the basilar-membrane waveform generated by each masker and possible influences of nonlinear cochlear processing on these internal responses. For normally hearing listeners, 60 dB SPL probes were most difficult to detect when temporally positioned so that probe frequency and masker instantaneous frequency were closely matched. For 80 dB SPL probes and for hearing-impaired listeners, probes presented at these same positions were often more easily detected than probes at other positions. The latter result appears to involve benefit associated with in-phase addition of the probe to a portion of the masker similar to the probe in both frequency and phase. This benefit was reduced or entirely eliminated when probe phase was altered so that this in-phase addition did not occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11108371     DOI: 10.1121/1.1318897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Psychoacoustic performance and music and speech perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Kyu Hwan Jung; Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Elyse Jameyson; Gary Miyasaki; Susan J Norton; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Discrimination of Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jeff K Longnion; Chad Ruffin; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-12-08

3.  Exploring the role of feedback-based auditory reflexes in forward masking by schroeder-phase complexes.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-22

4.  On- and off-frequency forward masking by Schroeder-phase complexes.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-07-21

5.  Psychophysical and modeling approaches towards determining the cochlear phase response based on interaural time differences.

Authors:  Hisaaki Tabuchi; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The role of compression in the simultaneous masker phase effect.

Authors:  Hisaaki Tabuchi; Bernhard Laback; Thibaud Necciari; Piotr Majdak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A Re-examination of the Effect of Masker Phase Curvature on Non-simultaneous Masking.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Sheila Flanagan; John M Deeks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-23

8.  Hearing preservation surgery: psychophysical estimates of cochlear damage in recipients of a short electrode array.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Anthony J Spahr; Sid P Bacon; Henryk Skarzynski; Artur Lorens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.482

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.