Literature DB >> 11099189

A monitor unit verification calculation in intensity modulated radiotherapy as a dosimetry quality assurance.

J H Kung1, G T Chen, F K Kuchnir.   

Abstract

In standard teletherapy, a treatment plan is generated with the aid of a treatment planning system, but it is common to perform an independent monitor unit verification calculation (MUVC). In exact analogy, we propose and demonstrate that a simple and accurate MUVC in intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is possible. We introduce the concept of modified Clarkson integration (MCI). In MCI, we exploit the rotational symmetry of scattering to simplify the dose calculation. For dose calculation along a central axis (CAX), we first replace the incident IMRT fluence by an azimuthally averaged fluence. Second, the Clarkson integration is carried over annular sectors instead of over pie sectors. We wrote a computer code, implementing the MCI technique, in order to perform a MUVC for IMRT purposes. We applied the code to IMRT plans generated by CORVUS. The input to the code consists of CORVUS plan data (e.g., DMLC files, jaw settings, MU for each IMRT field, depth to isocenter for each IMRT field), and the output is dose contribution by individual IMRTs field to the isocenter. The code uses measured beam data for Sc, Sp, TPR, (D/MU)ref and includes effects from multileaf collimator transmission, and radiation field offset. On a 266 MHz desktop computer, the code takes less than 15 to calculate a dose. The doses calculated with the MCI algorithm agreed within +/-3% with the doses calculated by CORVUS, which uses a 1 cm x 1 cm pencil beam in dose calculation. In the present version of MCI, skin contour variations and inhomogeneities were neglected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11099189     DOI: 10.1118/1.1286553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  13 in total

1.  Monitor unit calculations for external photon and electron beams: Report of the AAPM Therapy Physics Committee Task Group No. 71.

Authors:  John P Gibbons; John A Antolak; David S Followill; M Saiful Huq; Eric E Klein; Kwok L Lam; Jatinder R Palta; Donald M Roback; Mark Reid; Faiz M Khan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Validation and clinical implementation of commercial secondary check software with heterogeneity corrections.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi Kuppusamy; Vivekanandan Nagarajan; Lavanya Murugan
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-07-16

3.  Quasi-independent monitor unit calculation for intensity modulated sequential tomotherapy.

Authors:  Jen-San Tsai; Mark J Engler; James Liu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  A rapid communication from the AAPM Task Group 201: recommendations for the QA of external beam radiotherapy data transfer. AAPM TG 201: quality assurance of external beam radiotherapy data transfer.

Authors:  R Alfredo Siochi; Peter Balter; Charles D Bloch; Lakshmi Santanam; Kurt Blodgett; Bruce H Curran; Martijn Engelsman; Wenzheng Feng; Jim Mechalakos; Dan Pavord; Tom Simon; Steven Sutlieff; X Ronald Zhu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Modulation factors calculated with an EPID-derived MLC fluence model to streamline IMRT/VMAT second checks.

Authors:  Stephen Steciw; Satyapal Rathee; Brad Warkentin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Clinical implementation of dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy: Dosimetric aspects and initial experience.

Authors:  S S Sivakumar; K Krishnamurthy; C A Davis; R Ravichandran; S Kannadhasan; J P Biunkumar; Kamal El Ghamrawy
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2008-04

7.  Independent calculation of dose from a helical TomoTherapy unit.

Authors:  John P Gibbons; Koren Smith; Dennis Cheek; Isaac Rosen
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Commissioning and quality assurance for intensity modulated radiotherapy with dynamic multileaf collimator: experience of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.

Authors:  Carlos Daniel Venencia; Pelayo Besa
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Comparison of dose calculated by an intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning system and an independent monitor unit verification program.

Authors:  J J Haslam; D V Bonta; A E Lujan; C Rash; W Jackson; J C Roeske
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Commissioning results of an automated treatment planning verification system.

Authors:  Christopher L Nelson; Bryan E Mason; Ronald C Robinson; Kelly D Kisling; Steven M Kirsner
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.