Literature DB >> 11097398

Role of ultrasonography in the detection of intraductal spread of breast cancer: correlation with pathologic findings, mammography and MR imaging.

H Satake1, K Shimamoto, A Sawaki, R Niimi, Y Ando, T Ishiguchi, T Ishigaki, K Yamakawa, T Nagasaka, H Funahashi.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the role of US in the detection of intraductal spread of breast cancer in comparison with mammography (MMG) and MRI. In 46 patients with breast cancer, US features of the intraductal component were classified as ductal type or distorted type. Histopathologically, 29 of 46 (63%) cases had intraductal components, and the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates in detection of intraductal spread were 89, 76, and 85%, respectively. Each US pattern demonstrated good correspondence to the histologic components, and the distorted type correlated well with comedo-type carcinoma. Mammography was performed in all cases, and the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates in detection of intraductal spread were 55, 100, and 72%, respectively. In comedo type, MMG could diagnose the extent of intraductal spread more accurately compared with US examination. Magnetic resonance imaging comparison was available in 25 cases. Magnetic resonance imaging depicted intraductal extension as an enhanced area during the early phase of a contrast enhancement study with a sensitivity of 93%. Ultrasound and MRI were closely related in terms of morphologic characteristics: the ductal type of US image correlated well with linear enhancement on MRI, whereas the distorted type correlated with regional or segmental enhancement. Current US examination is useful in depicting the intraductal spread of breast cancer; however, US has a tendency to underestimate intraductal component of comedo type compared with MMG and MRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11097398     DOI: 10.1007/s003300000465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  14 in total

1.  Ultrasonographic alterations associated with the dilatation of mammary ducts: feature analysis and BI-RADS assessment.

Authors:  Hsian-He Hsu; Jyh-Cherng Yu; Giu-Cheng Hsu; Wei-Chou Chang; Cheng-Ping Yu; Ho-Jui Tung; Ching Tzao; Guo-Shu Huang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Correlation between mammographic and sonographic findings and prognostic factors in patients with node-negative invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  H J Shin; H H Kim; M O Huh; M J Kim; A Yi; H Kim; B H Son; S H Ahn
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Multifocal, multicentric and contralateral breast cancers: breast MR imaging in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  V Girardi; G Carbognin; L Camera; I Baglio; A Bucci; F Bonetti; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Accuracy of determining preoperative cancer extent measured by automated breast ultrasonography.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Tozaki; Eisuke Fukuma
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Detection of intraductal component around invasive breast cancer using ultrasound: correlation with MRI and histopathological findings.

Authors:  Sangeetha Sundararajan; Eriko Tohno; Hiroshi Kamma; Ei Ueno; Manabu Minami
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2006-02

6.  Intraoperative ultrasonographically guided excisional biopsy or vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast lesions.

Authors:  Shin-Cheh Chen; Horng-Ren Yang; Tsann-Long Hwang; Miin-Fu Chen; Yun-Chung Cheung; Swei Hsueh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  MR mammography in the pre-operative staging of breast cancer in patients with dense breast tissue: comparison with mammography and ultrasound.

Authors:  M Van Goethem; K Schelfout; L Dijckmans; J C Van Der Auwera; J Weyler; I Verslegers; I Biltjes; A De Schepper
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Enhancing area surrounding breast carcinoma on MR mammography: comparison with pathological examination.

Authors:  M Van Goethem; K Schelfout; E Kersschot; C Colpaert; I Verslegers; I Biltjes; W A Tjalma; J Weyler; A De Schepper
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Should we use MRI to screen women at high-risk of breast cancer?

Authors:  F J Gilbert
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging in size assessment of invasive breast carcinoma with an extensive intraductal component.

Authors:  Arjan P Schouten van der Velden; Carla Boetes; Peter Bult; Theo Wobbes
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 1.930

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.