Literature DB >> 16715671

Detection of intraductal component around invasive breast cancer using ultrasound: correlation with MRI and histopathological findings.

Sangeetha Sundararajan1, Eriko Tohno, Hiroshi Kamma, Ei Ueno, Manabu Minami.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was preoperatively to diagnose the intraductal component, which is indispensable in planning for breast conservation therapy, and also to minimize local recurrence. This study investigated the efficacy of ultrasound (US) in the detection of intraductal component in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histopathological findings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 47 patients with invasive breast cancer, US features of the intraductal component were classified as (a) solid ductal dilatation radiating from the tumor, (b) presence of satellite lesion in the same segment without ductal dilatation, and (c) ductal dilatation between the main tumor and satellite lesion. MRI depicted intraductal extension as the most enhanced area during the first or second phase of the dynamic study. Other criteria for the detection of the intraductal component by MRI were as follows: (a) a satellite lesion around the main tumor, (b) bridging enhancement between the main tumor and satellite lesions. The extent of the intraductal component was measured and classified as mimimal (0-5 mm), moderate (6-15 mm) or wide (>15 mm).
RESULTS: In 28 of 47 (60.0%) patients, a wide intraductal component of more than 15 mm was proved histopathologically. Of 28 patients, US and MRI could accurately detect wide intraductal components in 16 patients and 14 patients, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 57.1%, 84.2%, and 68.1% respectively for US and 50.0%, 89.5% and 65.9% for MRI, respectively. When both US and MRI results were combined, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 75.0%, 84.2%, and 78.7%.
CONCLUSION: Current US examination depicted the intraductal component of breast cancer more accurately than MRI. Further, our study suggests that the use of both US and MRI together is complementary and offers more advantage than US alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16715671     DOI: 10.1007/bf02493276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Med        ISSN: 0288-2043


  17 in total

1.  Extension of breast cancer: comparison of CT and MRI.

Authors:  Hiroshi Nakahara; Kiyoshi Namba; Hideyuki Wakamatsu; Ryoji Watanabe; Hidemi Furusawa; Mitsunori Shirouzu; Takafumi Matsu; Chiaki Tanaka; Futoshi Akiyama; Hiromi Ifuku; Mayumi Nakahara; Shozo Tamura
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb

2.  The Role of Contrast-Enhanced High Resolution MRI in the Surgical Planning of Breast Cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  1997-12-25       Impact factor: 4.239

3.  Intramammary Extension of Breast Cancer: Diagnosis with MR Mammography.

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  1998-07-25       Impact factor: 4.239

4.  MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  S G Orel; M H Mendonca; C Reynolds; M D Schnall; L J Solin; D C Sullivan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue.

Authors:  S S Kaplan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  The intraductal component of breast cancer is poorly responsive to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Wenwen Wu; Hiroshi Kamma; El Ueno; Masachika Fujiwara; Hiroaki Satoh; Hisato Hara; Tohru Yashiro; Yuji Aiyoshi
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging.

Authors:  R Gilles; J M Guinebretière; O Lucidarme; P Cluzel; G Janaud; J F Finet; A Tardivon; J Masselot; D Vanel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography.

Authors:  Tunetake Hata; Hiromasa Takahashi; Kenichi Watanabe; Masato Takahashi; Kazunori Taguchi; Tomoo Itoh; Satoru Todo
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Sensitivity and specificity of MR mammography with histopathological correlation in 250 breasts.

Authors:  B Boné; P Aspelin; L Bronge; B Isberg; L Perbeck; B Veress
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.990

10.  Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent.

Authors:  C Boetes; R D Mus; R Holland; J O Barentsz; S P Strijk; T Wobbes; J H Hendriks; S H Ruys
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  2 in total

1.  Magnetically-coated silica nanospheres for dual-mode imaging at low ultrasound frequency.

Authors:  Fernanda Chiriacò; Giulia Soloperto; Antonio Greco; Francesco Conversano; Andrea Ragusa; Luca Menichetti; Sergio Casciaro
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-11-28

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging in size assessment of invasive breast carcinoma with an extensive intraductal component.

Authors:  Arjan P Schouten van der Velden; Carla Boetes; Peter Bult; Theo Wobbes
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 1.930

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.