Literature DB >> 21191745

Accuracy of determining preoperative cancer extent measured by automated breast ultrasonography.

Mitsuhiro Tozaki1, Eisuke Fukuma.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of measuring preoperative cancer extent using automated breast ultrasonography (US).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study consisted of 40 patients with histopathologically confirmed breast cancer. All of the patients underwent automated breast US (ABVS; Siemens Medical Solutions, Mountain View, CA, USA) on the day before the surgery. The sizes of the lesions on US were measured on coronal multiplanar reconstruction images using the ABVS workstation. Histopathological measurement of tumor size included not only the invasive foci but also any in situ component and was used as the gold standard. The discrepancy of the tumor extent between automated breast US and the histological examination was calculated.
RESULTS: Automated breast US enabled visualization of the breast carcinomas in all patients. The mean size of the lesions on US was 12 mm (range 4-62 mm). The histopathological diagnosis was ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in seven patients and invasive ductal carcinoma in 33 patients (18 without an intraductal component, 15 with an intraductal component). Lesions ranged in diameter from 4 to 65 mm (mean 16 mm). The accuracy of determination of the tumor extent with a deviation in length of <2 cm was 98% (39/40).
CONCLUSION: Automated breast US is thought to be useful for evaluating tumor extent preoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21191745     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-010-0499-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Radiol        ISSN: 1867-1071            Impact factor:   2.374


  6 in total

1.  Role of ultrasonography in the detection of intraductal spread of breast cancer: correlation with pathologic findings, mammography and MR imaging.

Authors:  H Satake; K Shimamoto; A Sawaki; R Niimi; Y Ando; T Ishiguchi; T Ishigaki; K Yamakawa; T Nagasaka; H Funahashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography.

Authors:  H M Zonderland; E G Coerkamp; J Hermans; M J van de Vijver; A E van Voorthuisen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Screening-detected and symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the sonographic and pathologic features.

Authors:  Hee Jung Shin; Hak Hee Kim; Sun Mi Kim; Gui Young Kwon; Gyungyub Gong; On Koo Cho
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Role of ultrasonography and MRI in the detection of wide intraductal component of invasive breast cancer--a prospective study.

Authors:  S Sundararajan; E Tohno; H Kamma; E Ueno; M Minami
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.350

5.  Optimal scanning technique to cover the whole breast using an automated breast volume scanner.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Tozaki; Sachiko Isobe; Miki Yamaguchi; Yukari Ogawa; Masami Kohara; Chanwoong Joo; Eisuke Fukuma
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.

Authors:  E Wenkel; M Heckmann; M Heinrich; S A Schwab; M Uder; R Schulz-Wendtland; W A Bautz; R Janka
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2008-08-14
  6 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Automated breast ultrasound: basic principles and emerging clinical applications.

Authors:  Martina Zanotel; Iliana Bednarova; Viviana Londero; Anna Linda; Michele Lorenzon; Rossano Girometti; Chiara Zuiani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) in assessing breast cancer size: A comparison with conventional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Rossano Girometti; Martina Zanotel; Viviana Londero; Anna Linda; Michele Lorenzon; Chiara Zuiani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  The clinical utility of automated breast volume scanner: a pilot study of 139 cases.

Authors:  Young Wook Kim; Seon Kwang Kim; Hyun Jo Youn; Eun Jung Choi; Sung Hoo Jung
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.588

4.  Detectability and Usefulness of Automated Whole Breast Ultrasound in Patients with Suspicious Microcalcifications on Mammography: Comparison with Handheld Breast Ultrasound.

Authors:  Jae Jeong Choi; Sung Hun Kim; Bong Joo Kang; Byung Joo Song
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 3.588

5.  Radiologists' performance for detecting lesions and the interobserver variability of automated whole breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Sung Hun Kim; Bong Joo Kang; Byung Gil Choi; Jae Jung Choi; Ji Hye Lee; Byung Joo Song; Byung Joo Choe; Sarah Park; Hyunbin Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Diagnostic performance and inter-observer concordance in lesion detection with the automated breast volume scanner (ABVS).

Authors:  Sebastian Wojcinski; Samuel Gyapong; André Farrokh; Philipp Soergel; Peter Hillemanns; Friedrich Degenhardt
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  Evaluation of automated breast volume scanner for breast conservation surgery in ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Anqian Huang; Luoxi Zhu; Yanjuan Tan; Jian Liu; Jingjing Xiang; Qingqing Zhu; Lingyun Bao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.967

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.