Literature DB >> 11091529

Pathologic Assessment of Surgical Margins on Frozen and Permanent Sections in Breast Conserving Surgery.

.   

Abstract

The diagnostic value of frozen section was evaluated in the histologic assessment of surgical margins obtained by wide excision of breast tumors. There were 87 patients with unilateral breast cancer, and 5 with bilateral breast cancers. The periphery of the excised breast tissue was peeled like an orange and histologically examined by frozen and permanent section. If either in situ or infiltrating microscopic tumor was found at the margin, it was considered positive. Using frozen sections, the margin was judged histologically positive or suspicious in 30 tumors (31%) and negative in 67(69%) tumors. Positive surgical margins were histologically confirmed by permanent section in 20(67%) of the 30 tumors diagnosed as positive or suspicious on frozen section. Another 10 tumors had negative margins. In 4 tumors, however, while the initial or re-excised margin was negative on frozen section, the margins were positive by permanent section. These surgical margins were positive due exclusively to the presence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Evaluation of surgical margins in breast cancer by frozen section, thus exhibited a diagnostic accuracy of 86&prtcnt;, a sensitivity of 83%, and a specificity of 86%. It is concluded that frozen sections are useful in the determination of involvement of surgical margins after the wide excision of breast cancer. It must be pointed out that frozen sections will ofter overestimate involvement of the surgical margins.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 11091529     DOI: 10.1007/BF02966893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1340-6868            Impact factor:   4.239


  31 in total

1.  The significance of the pathology margins of the tumor excision on the outcome of patients treated with definitive irradiation for early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  L J Solin; B L Fowble; D J Schultz; R L Goodman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Implications of accurate pathologic margins in the treatment of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  T G Frazier; R W Wong; D Rose
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1989-01

3.  The world Health Organization Histological Typing of Breast Tumors--Second Edition. The World Organization.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Breast conservation is the treatment of choice in small breast cancer: long-term results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  U Veronesi; A Banfi; B Salvadori; A Luini; R Saccozzi; R Zucali; E Marubini; M Del Vecchio; P Boracchi; S Marchini
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Conservative treatment of early breast cancer: prognostic value of the ductal in situ component and other pathological variables on local control and survival. Long-term results.

Authors:  B Zafrani; P Vielh; A Fourquet; V Mosseri; J C Durand; R J Salmon; J R Vilcoq
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-11

6.  The optimal extent of resection for patients with stages I or II breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy.

Authors:  F A Vicini; T J Eberlein; J L Connolly; A Recht; A Abner; S J Schnitt; W Silen; J R Harris
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Breast-conserving surgery and tumour bed positivity in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  R D Macmillan; A D Purushotham; E Mallon; G Ramsay; W D George
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  B Fisher; C Redmond; R Poisson; R Margolese; N Wolmark; L Wickerham; E Fisher; M Deutsch; R Caplan; Y Pilch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-03-30       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Clinical decision-making in early breast cancer.

Authors:  C M Balch; S E Singletary; K I Bland
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (protocol 6). II. Relation of local breast recurrence to multicentricity.

Authors:  E R Fisher; R Sass; B Fisher; R Gregorio; R Brown; L Wickerham
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  9 in total

1.  [Minutes of the working group on gynecopathology and breast pathology. On the occasion of the 92nd Annual Congress of the German Society for Pathology in Berlin].

Authors:  S Lax; A Lebeau; A Schneider
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  X-ray phase-contrast imaging of the breast--advances towards clinical implementation.

Authors:  S D Auweter; J Herzen; M Willner; S Grandl; K Scherer; F Bamberg; M F Reiser; F Pfeiffer; K Hellerhoff
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  The effect of simultaneous peripheral excision in breast conservation upon margin status.

Authors:  Roshani R Patel; Tianyu Li; Eric A Ross; Linda Sesa; Elin R Sigurdson; Richard J Bleicher
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Frozen-section-guided breast-conserving surgery: implications of diagnosis by frozen section as a guide to determining the extent of resection.

Authors:  T Ikeda; K Enomoto; K Wada; K Takeshima; K Yoneyama; J Furukawa; Y Watanabe; M Mukai; M Kitajima
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Positive margin rates following breast-conserving surgery for stage I-III breast cancer: palpable versus nonpalpable tumors.

Authors:  Jordan Atkins; Fatema Al Mushawah; Catherine M Appleton; Amy E Cyr; William E Gillanders; Rebecca L Aft; Timothy J Eberlein; Feng Gao; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 6.  [Intraoperative pathological rapid investigations in breast surgery].

Authors:  M Dämmrich; C Thomssen; P Hillemanns; H Kreipe
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.011

7.  Intraoperative frozen section analysis of margins in breast conserving surgery significantly decreases reoperative rates: one-year experience at an ambulatory surgical center.

Authors:  Julie M Jorns; Daniel Visscher; Michael Sabel; Tara Breslin; Patrick Healy; Stephanie Daignaut; Jeffrey L Myers; Angela J Wu
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  Advancing optical imaging for breast margin assessment: an analysis of excisional time, cautery, and patent blue dye on underlying sources of contrast.

Authors:  Torre M Bydlon; William T Barry; Stephanie A Kennedy; J Quincy Brown; Jennifer E Gallagher; Lee G Wilke; Joseph Geradts; Nimmi Ramanujam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Margin Status Influence on the Outcome of Patients Treated with Breast Conserving Surgery.

Authors:  Akbari Me; M Akbari; H Zirakzadeh; N Nafissi; A Heidari; F Hosseinizadegan Shirazi
Journal:  Iran J Cancer Prev       Date:  2011
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.