Literature DB >> 9068099

Frozen-section-guided breast-conserving surgery: implications of diagnosis by frozen section as a guide to determining the extent of resection.

T Ikeda1, K Enomoto, K Wada, K Takeshima, K Yoneyama, J Furukawa, Y Watanabe, M Mukai, M Kitajima.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to analyze retrospectively the results of performing sector resection on 56 breasts in 54 patients with breast cancer. The glands were resected with a 2-cm tumor-free margin on both lateral sides and the distal side, and with more than a 3-cm tumor-free margin on the nipple side. The frequency of positive resection margins for the cancer cells was 7/56 (12.5%) on the nipple side and 12/46 (26.1%) on the lateral sides, with an overall frequency of 15/56 (26.8%). There were positive resected margins for cancer cells on both the nipple and lateral sides in 4/46 patients (9%). Assuming the equivocal margins were positive for cancer cells, an accurate diagnosis by frozen section examination was made in 51 of the 56 operations (91.1%). Additional resection of the margins was performed in all 20 cases of a positive resected margin for cancer cells according to the diagnosis by frozen section. Thereafter, the resected margins became negative in 13 cases (65%), but remained positive in 7 cases (35%). These results show that performing diagnosis by frozen section of the surgical margins is an effective guide to resecting tumors adequately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9068099     DOI: 10.1007/bf00941646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  22 in total

1.  Breast-conserving surgery: how much is enough?

Authors:  R E Hermann; S Grundfest-Broniatowski; C B Esselstyn
Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  1992 May-Jun

Review 2.  NIH consensus conference. Treatment of early-stage breast cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-01-16       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Implications of accurate pathologic margins in the treatment of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  T G Frazier; R W Wong; D Rose
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1989-01

4.  Breast conservation is the treatment of choice in small breast cancer: long-term results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  U Veronesi; A Banfi; B Salvadori; A Luini; R Saccozzi; R Zucali; E Marubini; M Del Vecchio; P Boracchi; S Marchini
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  The optimal extent of resection for patients with stages I or II breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy.

Authors:  F A Vicini; T J Eberlein; J L Connolly; A Recht; A Abner; S J Schnitt; W Silen; J R Harris
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long-term results of breast conservation.

Authors:  M C Smitt; K W Nowels; M J Zdeblick; S Jeffrey; R W Carlson; F E Stockdale; D R Goffinet
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Segmental mastectomy without radiotherapy. Short-term follow-up.

Authors:  M D Lagios; V E Richards; M R Rose; E Yee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Breast-conserving surgery and tumour bed positivity in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  R D Macmillan; A D Purushotham; E Mallon; G Ramsay; W D George
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  B Fisher; C Redmond; R Poisson; R Margolese; N Wolmark; L Wickerham; E Fisher; M Deutsch; R Caplan; Y Pilch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-03-30       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Evaluation of resection margins after breast conservative surgery with monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  U Veronesi; G Farante; V Galimberti; M Greco; A Luini; V Sacchini; S Andreola; F Leoni; S Ménard; M Ronco
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.424

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Intraoperative imprint cytology and frozen section pathology for margin assessment in breast conservation surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Karla Esbona; Zhanhai Li; Lee G Wilke
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Intraoperative frozen section analysis of margins in breast conserving surgery significantly decreases reoperative rates: one-year experience at an ambulatory surgical center.

Authors:  Julie M Jorns; Daniel Visscher; Michael Sabel; Tara Breslin; Patrick Healy; Stephanie Daignaut; Jeffrey L Myers; Angela J Wu
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  The Efficacy of Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis During Breast-Conserving Surgery for Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Mi Jin Kim; Cheol Seung Kim; Young Sam Park; Eun Hye Choi; Kyu Dam Han
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2016-12-08

4.  Accuracy of frozen section in intraoperative margin assessment for breast-conserving surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mila Trementosa Garcia; Bruna Salani Mota; Natalia Cardoso; Ana Luiza Cabrera Martimbianco; Marcos Desidério Ricci; Filomena Marino Carvalho; Rodrigo Gonçalves; José Maria Soares Junior; José Roberto Filassi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.