Literature DB >> 11090664

Attentional effects on contrast detection in the presence of surround masks.

B Zenger1, J Braun, C Koch.   

Abstract

We studied how attention affects contrast detection performance when the target is surrounded by mask elements. In each display quadrant we presented a hexagon of six vertical Gabor patches (the 'surround'). Only one of the hexagons contained a central Gabor patch (the 'target') and the task was to report that quadrant (spatial four-alternative-forced choice). Attention was manipulated by means of a double-task paradigm: in one condition observers had to perform concurrently a central letter-discrimination task, and the contrast-detection task was then only poorly attended, while attention was fully available in the other condition. We find that under poorly attended conditions targets can be detected only when the target contrast exceeds the surround contrast (contrast popout) or when the target orientation differs from the surround orientation by more than 10-15 degrees (orientation popout). When the target orientation is similar to the surround orientation, attention can reduce the contrast detection thresholds in some cases more than four-fold, demonstrating a very strong attentional effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11090664     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00218-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  16 in total

1.  Response suppression in v1 agrees with psychophysics of surround masking.

Authors:  Barbara Zenger-Landolt; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Action-video-game experience alters the spatial resolution of vision.

Authors:  C S Green; D Bavelier
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-01

3.  Using a filtering task to measure the spatial extent of selective attention.

Authors:  John Palmer; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Two distinct mechanisms of suppression in human vision.

Authors:  Yury Petrov; Matteo Carandini; Suzanne McKee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Divided attention in the tactile modality.

Authors:  Sharon Daniel; Thomas Andrillon; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Jeroen J A van Boxtel
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Network dynamics predict improvement in working memory performance following donepezil administration in healthy young adults.

Authors:  A Reches; I Laufer; K Ziv; G Cukierman; K McEvoy; M Ettinger; R T Knight; A Gazzaley; A B Geva
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Visual spatial attention enhances the amplitude of positive and negative fMRI responses to visual stimulation in an eccentricity-dependent manner.

Authors:  David W Bressler; Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Lynn C Robertson; Michael A Silver
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  Attention: oscillations and neuropharmacology.

Authors:  Gustavo Deco; Alexander Thiele
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Attention and contrast differently affect contextual integration in an orientation discrimination task.

Authors:  M J Roberts; A Thiele
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Attention alters spatial integration in macaque V1 in an eccentricity-dependent manner.

Authors:  Mark Roberts; Louise S Delicato; Jose Herrero; Mark A Gieselmann; Alexander Thiele
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.