Literature DB >> 11086205

The influence of gemcitabine and cisplatin schedule on response and survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

F A Shepherd1, R Abratt, L Crino, M Green, A Sandler, W Steward, J Iglesias, G Anglin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Gemcitabine-cisplatin combinations are among the most active for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Previous reports have suggested that the day of cisplatin administration affects both toxicity and drug delivery. We undertook this retrospective analysis to determine whether it also affects response and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of six studies of gemcitabine and cisplatin. Gemcitabine, 1000-1500 mg/m(2) was administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28 day cycle. In four studies cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) was administered with mannitol diuresis every four weeks on either day 1, day 2 or day 15. In two studies cisplatin 25-30 mg/m(2) was administered on day 1, 8 and 15. Standard prognostic factors including age, gender, stage, performance status, and histologic subtype were analyzed along with day of cisplatin administration. Single variable Cox proportional hazards regressions were performed. This was followed by multiple variable Cox proportional hazards regression, beginning with a full model containing terms for gender, age, performance status and stage. The least statistically significant terms were subsequently dropped from the model to reach a final model with only statistically significant variables. A similar approach was followed to fit a multiple variable logistic regression model to overall response data.
RESULTS: Overall response rates were highest (36-46%) in the three studies that administered cisplatin on days 2 or 15, and these studies had the highest 1-year survival rates (52-58%). Survival was better for patients who received cisplatin on day 2 or 15 compared to those treated on either day 1 or weekly on days 1, 8, 15 (P=0.020). In the final model of the Cox regression analysis, survival was better for cisplatin on days 2 or 15 (hazard ratio=0.69, P=0.008) and female gender (hazard ratio=0.72, P=0.036). Only cisplatin delivery on day 2 or day 15 predicted for significantly better response (42 vs. 29%, P=0.036).
CONCLUSION: In a 28 day cycle in which gemcitabine is administered day 1, 8 and 15, the best therapeutic index is achieved with cisplatin administration on day 2 or 15.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11086205     DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5002(00)00135-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  7 in total

1.  A 21-day schedule of gemcitabine and cisplatin administration in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma: a phase II study.

Authors:  Jong-Sung Park; Chang-Min Lee; Shin-Ae Lee; Chang-Kil Jung; Sung-Hyun Kim; Hyuk-Chan Kwon; Jae-Seok Kim; Hyo-Jin Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-02-29       Impact factor: 4.679

2.  Economic evaluation of gemcitabine alone and in combination with cisplatin in the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Authors:  M Lees; M Aristides; N Maniadakis; J McKendrick; N Botwood; D Stephenson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Paclitaxel plus platinum or gemcitabine plus platinum in first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results from 6 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jingwei Jiang; Xiaohua Liang; Xinli Zhou; Ruofan Huang; Zhaohui Chu; Qiong Zhan
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  A phase I safety, pharmacological, and biological study of the farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor, lonafarnib (SCH 663366), in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Laura Q M Chow; S Gail Eckhardt; Cindy L O'Bryant; Mary Kay Schultz; Mark Morrow; Stacy Grolnic; Michele Basche; Lia Gore
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 5.  A comprehensive review of nongenetic prognostic and predictive factors influencing the heterogeneity of outcomes in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Gebra Cuyún Carter; Amy M Barrett; James A Kaye; Astra M Liepa; Katherine B Winfree; William J John
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.989

6.  A randomized, multicenter phase II study comparing efficacy, safety and tolerability of two dosing regimens of cisplatin and pemetrexed in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Martin Metzenmacher; Hans-Georg Kopp; Frank Griesinger; Niels Reinmuth; Martin Sebastian; Monika Serke; Cornelius Florian Waller; Michael Thomas; Jochen Eggert; Gerald Schmid-Bindert; Mathias Hoiczyk; Daniel Christian Christoph; Martin Kimmich; Burkhard Deuß; Stephanie Seifert; Swantje Held; Martin Schuler; Thomas Herold; Frank Breitenbuecher; Wilfried Ernst Erich Eberhardt
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 8.168

7.  A multicentre phase II study of cisplatin and gemcitabine for malignant mesothelioma.

Authors:  A K Nowak; M J Byrne; R Williamson; G Ryan; A Segal; D Fielding; P Mitchell; A W Musk; B W S Robinson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-08-27       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.