Literature DB >> 18058098

A phase I safety, pharmacological, and biological study of the farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor, lonafarnib (SCH 663366), in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Laura Q M Chow1, S Gail Eckhardt, Cindy L O'Bryant, Mary Kay Schultz, Mark Morrow, Stacy Grolnic, Michele Basche, Lia Gore.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This phase I study was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacological properties and biological activity of the combination of the lonafarnib, a farnesylproteintransferase (FTPase) inhibitor, with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid malignancies. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: This was a single institution study to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of escalating lonafarnib (75-125 mg po BID) with gemcitabine (750-1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15) and fixed cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) day 1) every 28 days. Due to dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in initial patients, these patients were considered "heavily pre-treated" and the protocol was amended to limit prior therapy and re-escalate lonafarnib in "less heavily pre-treated patients" on 28-day and 21-day schedules. Cycle 1 and 2 pharmacokinetics (PK), and farnesylation of the HDJ2 chaperone protein and FPTase activity were analyzed.
RESULTS: Twenty-two patients received 53 courses of therapy. Nausea, vomiting, and fatigue were frequent in all patients. Severe toxicities were observed in 91% of patients: neutropenia (41%), nausea (36%), thrombocytopenia (32%), anemia (23%) and vomiting (23%). Nine patients withdrew from the study due to toxicity. DLTs of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and fatigue limited dose-escalation on the 28-day schedule. The MTD was established as lonafarnib 75 mg BID, gemcitabine 750 mg/m(2) days 1, 8, 15, and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) in heavily pre-treated patients. The MTD in the less heavily pre-treated patients could not be established on the 28-day schedule as DLTs were observed at the lowest dose level, and dose escalation was not completed on the 21-day schedule due to early study termination by the Sponsor. No PK interactions were observed. FTPase inhibition was not observed at the MTD, however HDJ-2 gel shift was observed in one patient at the 100 mg BID lonafarnib dose. Anti-cancer activity was observed: four patients had stable disease lasting >2 cycles, one subject had a complete response, and another had a partial response, both with metastatic breast cancer.
CONCLUSION: Lonafarnib 75 mg BID, gemcitabine 750 mg/m(2) days 1, 8, 15, and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) day 1 on a 28-day schedule was established as the MTD. Lonafarnib did not demonstrate FTPase inhibition at these doses. Despite the observed efficacy, substantial toxicity and questionable contribution of anti-tumor activity of lonafarnib to gemcitabine and cisplatin limits further exploration of this combination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18058098      PMCID: PMC2813768          DOI: 10.1007/s00280-007-0646-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  43 in total

1.  Combined platinum containing treatment in NSCLC.

Authors:  Lucio Crinò
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.705

2.  Farnesyl transferase inhibitor SCH66336 is cytostatic, pro-apoptotic and enhances chemosensitivity to cisplatin in melanoma cells.

Authors:  Keiran S M Smalley; Tim G Eisen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2003-06-10       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 3.  Gemcitabine: single-agent and combination therapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  A Sandler; D S Ettinger
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  1999

4.  Phase II study of a gemcitabine and cisplatin combination regimen in taxane resistant metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Jae Hong Seo; Sang Cheul Oh; Cheul Won Choi; Byung Soo Kim; Sang Won Shin; Yeul Hong Kim; Jun Suk Kim; Ae-Ree Kim; Jae-Bok Lee; Bum Hwan Koo
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Efficacy of gemcitabine plus platinum chemotherapy compared with other platinum containing regimens in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of survival outcomes.

Authors:  T Le Chevalier; G Scagliotti; R Natale; S Danson; R Rosell; R Stahel; P Thomas; R M Rudd; J Vansteenkiste; N Thatcher; C Manegold; J-L Pujol; N van Zandwijk; C Gridelli; J P van Meerbeeck; L Crino; A Brown; P Fitzgerald; M Aristides; J H Schiller
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.705

6.  Gemcitabine alone or with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a prospective, randomized phase III study of the Gruppo Oncologia dell'Italia Meridionale.

Authors:  Giuseppe Colucci; Francesco Giuliani; Vittorio Gebbia; Maria Biglietto; Piergiorgio Rabitti; Generoso Uomo; Silvio Cigolari; Antonio Testa; Evaristo Maiello; Massimo Lopez
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic bladder cancer: long-term follow-up of a 3-week regimen.

Authors:  V Adamo; C Magno; G Spitaleri; C Garipoli; C Maisano; E Alafaci; B Adamo; R Rossello; G Scandurra; A Scimone
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 2.935

Review 8.  Update on chemotherapy for advanced bladder cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan E Rosenberg; Peter R Carroll; Eric J Small
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Role of gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced and metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Volker Heinemann
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.935

10.  Farnesyl transferase inhibitors: a major breakthrough in anticancer therapy? Naples, 12 April 2002.

Authors:  Francesco Caponigro
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.248

View more
  9 in total

1.  A phase I multicenter study of continuous oral administration of lonafarnib (SCH 66336) and intravenous gemcitabine in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Nan Soon Wong; Kellen L Meadows; Lee S Rosen; Alex A Adjei; Scott H Kaufmann; Michael A Morse; William P Petros; Yali Zhu; Paul Statkevich; David L Cutler; Michael L Meyers; Herbert I Hurwitz
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.176

2.  A phase I trial of the farnesyl transferase inhibitor, SCH 66336, with temozolomide for patients with malignant glioma.

Authors:  Annick Desjardins; David A Reardon; Katherine B Peters; Stevie Threatt; April D Coan; James E Herndon; Allan H Friedman; Henry S Friedman; James J Vredenburgh
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Inhibition of mutant Kras and p53-driven pancreatic carcinogenesis by atorvastatin: Mainly via targeting of the farnesylated DNAJA1 in chaperoning mutant p53.

Authors:  Dandan Xu; Xin Tong; Leyu Sun; Haonan Li; Ryan D Jones; Jie Liao; Guang-Yu Yang
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.784

Review 4.  KRAS: A Druggable Target in Colon Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Francesca Negri; Lorena Bottarelli; Gian Luigi de'Angelis; Letizia Gnetti
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  Targeted agents for the treatment of metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Jose G Monzon; Janet Dancey
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Synergistic effect of farnesyl transferase inhibitor lonafarnib combined with chemotherapeutic agents against the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Jialiang Wang; Yifan Lian; Yurong Gu; Hongbo Wang; Lin Gu; Yanlin Huang; Liang Zhou; Yuehua Huang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-10-26

Review 7.  Treatment of NRAS-mutated advanced or metastatic melanoma: rationale, current trials and evidence to date.

Authors:  Amélie Boespflug; Julie Caramel; Stephane Dalle; Luc Thomas
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 8.168

8.  Structure and function of human DnaJ homologue subfamily a member 1 (DNAJA1) and its relationship to pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Jaime L Stark; Kamiya Mehla; Nina Chaika; Thomas B Acton; Rong Xiao; Pankaj K Singh; Gaetano T Montelione; Robert Powers
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 9.  Oncogenic KRAS blockade therapy: renewed enthusiasm and persistent challenges.

Authors:  Daolin Tang; Guido Kroemer; Rui Kang
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 27.401

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.