Literature DB >> 11081884

Partial aortic valve fusion induced by left ventricular assist device.

A G Rose1, S J Park, A J Bank, L W Miller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) may be used (1) as a bridging device to cardiac transplantation, (2) for permanent replacement of left ventricular function, and (3) as a bridge to recovery of ventricular function, for example, in recoverable myocardial disease. In this third group of patients, it is important that the LVAD does not produce changes in the heart that will have a deleterious effect on cardiac function once the device is removed. Furthermore, if the LVAD fails, survival depends on optimal function of the diseased heart.
METHODS: All hearts with LVADs encountered as surgical specimens following heart transplantation or at autopsy at the Fairview-University of Minnesota Medical Center during the 5-month period August 1998 to January 1999 were examined for native valvular heart disease. The nature and extent of commissural fusion was noted and measured. Light microscopy was performed on any valve lesions.
RESULTS: Four of 6 patients with HeartMate (Thermo Cardiosystems, Inc, Woburn, MA) LVADs showed evidence of commissural fusion (acquired aortic stenosis). In 1 patient, this condition was caused by an organizing thrombus uniting a 14-mm length of the commissural region of the right coronary and noncoronary cusps of the aortic valve. Fibrous commissural fusion due to totally organized thrombus in the other 3 patients affected one aortic commissure (2 patients, 2 mm and 4 mm, respectively) and two commissures (1 patient, 2 mm and 5 mm). Partial cuspal fusion in each case was due to permanent closure of the native aortic valve induced by the LVAD's operating in its automatic setting. Mean length of commissural fusion was 5.4 mm (range, 2 to 14 mm; standard deviation [SDI = +/-5.0 mm). Mean duration of implantation of the six LVADs was 180.3 days (range, 26 to 689 days; SD = +/-253.8 days). The LVADs of the 3 patients with fibrous fusion of the commissures had been implanted for an average of 252.3 days (range, 26 to 689 days; SD = +/-378.2 days).
CONCLUSIONS: Normal function of the LVAD produces permanent closure of the native aortic valve. Stasis on the ventricular aspect of the aortic valve, combined with a low level of anticoagulation, favors thrombosis at this site. Thrombus organization leads to aortic stenosis of variable severity. This previously unsuspected complication was not detected clinically in any of our patients. Aortic stenosis may hold serious implications for patients in whom the LVAD acts as a bridge to recovery or in those in whom the LVAD fails. Prevention may be achieved by intermittently reducing LVAD pumping action. A built-in venting cycle would be of value in long-term implants. Thrombi on the aortic valve may also predispose patients to infective endocarditis, because bloodstream infection is common in patients with LVADs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11081884     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01929-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  15 in total

1.  Analysis of aortic valve commissural fusion after support with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Jerson R Martina; Marguerite E I Schipper; Nicolaas de Jonge; Faiz Ramjankhan; Roel A de Weger; Jaap R Lahpor; Aryan Vink
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-06-24

Review 2.  Management of aortic insufficiency in the continuous flow left ventricular assist device population.

Authors:  Jonathan Holtz; Jeffrey Teuteberg
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2014-03

3.  Computational analysis of the importance of flow synchrony for cardiac ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Matthew McCormick; David Nordsletten; Pablo Lamata; Nicolas P Smith
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.589

4.  Physiologic and hematologic concerns of rotary blood pumps: what needs to be improved?

Authors:  Tohid Pirbodaghi; Siavash Asgari; Chris Cotter; Kevin Bourque
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.214

5.  The development of aortic insufficiency in left ventricular assist device-supported patients.

Authors:  Jennifer Cowger; Francis D Pagani; Jonathan W Haft; Matthew A Romano; Keith D Aaronson; Theodore J Kolias
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 6.  Evaluating heart failure after implantation of mechanical circulatory support devices.

Authors:  Keyur B Shah; Daniel G Tang; Richard H Cooke; Michael C Kontos; Neil P Lewis; Gundars J Katlaps; Michael L Hess; Vigneshwar Kasirajan
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2012-03

7.  Mathematical evaluation of cardiac beat synchronization control used for a rotary blood pump.

Authors:  Daisuke Ogawa; Shinji Kobayashi; Kenji Yamazaki; Tadashi Motomura; Takashi Nishimura; Junichi Shimamura; Tomonori Tsukiya; Toshihide Mizuno; Yoshiaki Takewa; Eisuke Tatsumi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2019-07-20       Impact factor: 1.731

8.  Comparison of continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices: is there an advantage to pulsatility?

Authors:  Allen Cheng; Christine A Williamitis; Mark S Slaughter
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-11

9.  Preservation of native aortic valve flow and full hemodynamic support with the TORVAD using a computational model of the cardiovascular system.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Gohean; Mitchell J George; Kay-Won Chang; Erik R Larson; Thomas D Pate; Mark Kurusz; Raul G Longoria; Richard W Smalling
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 10.  Chronic outpatient management of patients with a left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Elisa M Smith; Jennifer Franzwa
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.