Literature DB >> 11079853

RADARx: Recognizing, Assessing, and Documenting Adverse Rx events.

S Brown1, K Black, S Mrochek, A Wood, T Bess, J Cobb, J Francis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adverse events are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) are frequent, under-reported, costly, and largely preventable. Computerized tools expose effectively ADEs and can reduce their impact.
METHODS: RADARx is a Veterans Administration (VA) VistA-compatible M software program that integrates computerized ADE screening, probability assessment, documentation, and reporting capabilities. Data dictionary mapping tools have enabled RADARx implementation at 3 sites. All RADARx alerts generated at VA Medical Center (VAMC) Nashville from 7/1/99 to 9/30/99 were evaluated.
RESULTS: Total ADEs documented using RADARx numbered 57. RADARx discovered 34 ADEs and 48 'potential' ADEs; 23 ADEs were found using traditional means. Overall, 11% of RADARx alerts were true positives. Pharmacist review of the 8-20 alerts generated daily costs between 10 and 30 minutes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11079853      PMCID: PMC2243889     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp        ISSN: 1531-605X


  10 in total

1.  Identifying adverse drug events: development of a computer-based monitor and comparison with chart review and stimulated voluntary report.

Authors:  A K Jha; G J Kuperman; J M Teich; L Leape; B Shea; E Rittenberg; E Burdick; D L Seger; M Vander Vliet; D W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Physician knowledge, attitudes, and behavior related to reporting adverse drug events.

Authors:  A S Rogers; E Israel; C R Smith; D Levine; A M McBean; C Valente; G Faich
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-07

3.  Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group.

Authors:  D W Bates; D J Cullen; N Laird; L A Petersen; S D Small; D Servi; G Laffel; B J Sweitzer; B F Shea; R Hallisey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-07-05       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  C A Naranjo; U Busto; E M Sellers; P Sandor; I Ruiz; E A Roberts; E Janecek; C Domecq; D J Greenblatt
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Preventing adverse drug events in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  R S Evans; S L Pestotnik; D C Classen; S D Horn; S B Bass; J P Burke
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  A computer alert system to prevent injury from adverse drug events: development and evaluation in a community teaching hospital.

Authors:  R A Raschke; B Gollihare; T A Wunderlich; J R Guidry; A I Leibowitz; J C Peirce; L Lemelson; M A Heisler; C Susong
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events in hospitalized adults.

Authors:  D W Bates; L L Leape; S Petrycki
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Computerized surveillance of adverse drug events in hospital patients.

Authors:  D C Classen; S L Pestotnik; R S Evans; J P Burke
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Relationship between medication errors and adverse drug events.

Authors:  D W Bates; D L Boyle; M B Vander Vliet; J Schneider; L Leape
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Using a hospital information system to assess the effects of adverse drug events.

Authors:  R S Evans; D C Classen; L E Stevens; S L Pestotnik; R M Gardner; J F Lloyd; J P Burke
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1993
  10 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Detecting adverse events using information technology.

Authors:  David W Bates; R Scott Evans; Harvey Murff; Peter D Stetson; Lisa Pizziferri; George Hripcsak
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  A systematic review of the performance characteristics of clinical event monitor signals used to detect adverse drug events in the hospital setting.

Authors:  Steven M Handler; Richard L Altman; Subashan Perera; Joseph T Hanlon; Stephanie A Studenski; James E Bost; Melissa I Saul; Douglas B Fridsma
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  A systematic review to evaluate the accuracy of electronic adverse drug event detection.

Authors:  Alan J Forster; Alison Jennings; Claire Chow; Ciera Leeder; Carl van Walraven
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Adverse drug events with hyperkalaemia during inpatient stays: evaluation of an automated method for retrospective detection in hospital databases.

Authors:  Grégoire Ficheur; Emmanuel Chazard; Jean-Baptiste Beuscart; Béatrice Merlin; Michel Luyckx; Régis Beuscart
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Application of the emergency medical services trigger tool to measure adverse events in prehospital emergency care: a time series analysis.

Authors:  Ian Howard; Bernard Pillay; Nicholas Castle; Loua Al Shaikh; Robert Owen; David Williams
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2018-11-26

6.  Retrospective identification of medication related adverse events in the emergency medical services through the analysis of a patient safety register.

Authors:  Ian Howard; Ian Howland; Nicholas Castle; Loua Al Shaikh; Robert Owen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.