BACKGROUND: Diets high in fruits and vegetables have been shown to be associated with a lower risk of lung cancer. beta-Carotene was hypothesized to be largely responsible for the apparent protective effect, but this hypothesis was not supported by clinical trials. METHODS: We examined the association between lung cancer risk and fruit and vegetable consumption in 77 283 women in the Nurses' Health Study and 47 778 men in the Health Professionals' Follow-up Study. Diet was assessed with the use of a food-frequency questionnaire that included 15 fruits and 23 vegetables. We used logistic regression models to estimate relative risks (RRs) of lung cancer within each cohort. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: We documented 519 lung cancer cases among the women and 274 among the men. Total fruit and vegetable consumption was associated with a modestly lower risk of lung cancer among the women but not among the men. The RR for the highest versus lowest quintile of intake was 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.59-1.06) among the women and 1.12 (95% CI = 0.74-1.69) among the men after adjustment for smoking status, quantity of cigarettes smoked per day, time since quitting smoking, and age at initiation of smoking. However, total fruit and vegetable consumption was associated with a lower risk of lung cancer among never smokers in the combined cohorts, although the reduction was not statistically significant (RR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.35-1.12 in the highest tertile). CONCLUSION: Higher fruit and vegetable intakes were associated with lower risks of lung cancer in women but not in men. It is possible that the inverse association among the women remained confounded by unmeasured smoking characteristics, although fruits and vegetables were protective in both men and women who never smoked.
BACKGROUND: Diets high in fruits and vegetables have been shown to be associated with a lower risk of lung cancer. beta-Carotene was hypothesized to be largely responsible for the apparent protective effect, but this hypothesis was not supported by clinical trials. METHODS: We examined the association between lung cancer risk and fruit and vegetable consumption in 77 283 women in the Nurses' Health Study and 47 778 men in the Health Professionals' Follow-up Study. Diet was assessed with the use of a food-frequency questionnaire that included 15 fruits and 23 vegetables. We used logistic regression models to estimate relative risks (RRs) of lung cancer within each cohort. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: We documented 519 lung cancer cases among the women and 274 among the men. Total fruit and vegetable consumption was associated with a modestly lower risk of lung cancer among the women but not among the men. The RR for the highest versus lowest quintile of intake was 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.59-1.06) among the women and 1.12 (95% CI = 0.74-1.69) among the men after adjustment for smoking status, quantity of cigarettes smoked per day, time since quitting smoking, and age at initiation of smoking. However, total fruit and vegetable consumption was associated with a lower risk of lung cancer among never smokers in the combined cohorts, although the reduction was not statistically significant (RR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.35-1.12 in the highest tertile). CONCLUSION: Higher fruit and vegetable intakes were associated with lower risks of lung cancer in women but not in men. It is possible that the inverse association among the women remained confounded by unmeasured smoking characteristics, although fruits and vegetables were protective in both men and women who never smoked.
Authors: Stephanie M Tortorella; Simon G Royce; Paul V Licciardi; Tom C Karagiannis Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2014-12-19 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: Adonina Tardon; Won Jin Lee; Miguel Delgado-Rodriguez; Mustafa Dosemeci; Demetrius Albanes; Robert Hoover; Aaron Blair Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Christopher G Slatore; Alyson J Littman; David H Au; Jessie A Satia; Emily White Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2007-11-07 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Li Tang; Gary R Zirpoli; Vijayvel Jayaprakash; Mary E Reid; Susan E McCann; Chukwumere E Nwogu; Yuesheng Zhang; Christine B Ambrosone; Kirsten B Moysich Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2010-04-27 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: F L Büchner; H B Bueno-de-Mesquita; J Linseisen; H C Boshuizen; L A L M Kiemeney; M M Ros; K Overvad; L Hansen; A Tjonneland; O Raaschou-Nielsen; F Clavel-Chapelon; M-C Boutron-Ruault; M Touillaud; R Kaaks; S Rohrmann; H Boeing; U Nöthlings; A Trichopoulou; D Zylis; V Dilis; D Palli; S Sieri; P Vineis; R Tumino; S Panico; P H M Peeters; C H van Gils; E Lund; I T Gram; T Braaten; C Martinez; A Agudo; L Arriola; E Ardanaz; C Navarro; L Rodríguez; J Manjer; E Wirfält; G Hallmans; T Rasmuson; T J Key; A W Roddam; S Bingham; K-T Khaw; N Slimani; P Bofetta; G Byrnes; T Norat; D Michaud; E Riboli Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 2.506