Literature DB >> 11066101

Radiation exposure of patients and coronary arteries in the stent era: A prospective study.

D Katritsis1, E Efstathopoulos, S Betsou, S Korovesis, K Faulkner, G Panayiotakis, M M Webb-Peploe.   

Abstract

Previous studies have investigated the radiation dose to doctors and patients during coronary angiography and angioplasty, but most of them were retrospective, conducted in the prestent era, and results have not been consistent. Effective dose of 57 patients undergoing coronary angiography and/or angioplasty was assessed by using a dose-area product (DAP) to effective dose conversion factor. Radiation exposure risks to patients were then calculated for each procedure. Thermoluminescent dosimeters, mounted on a specially designed catheter that was advanced to the left or right sinus of Valsalva, were used to measure the dose received by the coronary arteries. Mean effective dose received by patients were 5.0 +/- 0.5 mSv for coronary angiography, 6.6 +/- 1.0 mSv for angioplasty, 10.2 +/- 1.5 mSv for angioplasty followed by stent implantation, 13.6 +/- 2.5 mSv for angiography followed by ad hoc angioplasty, and 16.7 +/- 2.8 mSv for angiography followed by ad hoc angioplasty and stent implantation. Patient risk of developing cancer after each procedure was 0.025%, 0.033%, 0.051%, 0.068%, and 0.084%, respectively. Corresponding mean coronary irradiation doses were 24 +/- 2.5, 31.0 +/- 3.6, 43.6 +/- 7.2, 55.0 +/- 7.5, and 64.7 +/- 5.6 mGy, respectively. A linear relationship of the DAP and the dose at the coronary arteries was found: DAP = 1,273 (cm(2)) x coronary dose (mGy). Radiation exposure to coronary arteries and associated risk to patients are relatively low, even following complicated, multivessel angioplasty with stent implantation. Our method can be used for calculation of radiation risk to patients and radiation dose to coronary arteries by using external dosimeters. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 51:259-264, 2000. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11066101     DOI: 10.1002/1522-726x(200011)51:3<259::aid-ccd2>3.0.co;2-i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  11 in total

1.  The 'what, when, where, who and how?' of cardiac computed tomography in 2009: guidelines for the clinician.

Authors:  B J W Chow; E Larose; S Bilodeau; M L Ellins; P Galiwango; M Kass; T Sheth; D S Jassal; I D C Kirkpatrick; G B John Mancini; J Mayo; A Abraham; J White
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.223

2.  Impact of biplane versus single-plane imaging on radiation dose, contrast load and procedural time in coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  V Sadick; W Reed; L Collins; N Sadick; R Heard; J Robinson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Robust automatic rigid registration of MRI and X-ray using external fiducial markers for XFM-guided interventional procedures.

Authors:  Ashvin K George; Merdim Sonmez; Robert J Lederman; Anthony Z Faranesh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Effectiveness of fluorography versus cineangiography at reducing radiation exposure during diagnostic coronary angiography.

Authors:  Binita Shah; Xingchen Mai; Lakshmi Tummala; Chad Kliger; Sripal Bangalore; Louis H Miller; Steven P Sedlis; Frederick Feit; Michael Liou; Michael Attubato; John Coppola; James Slater
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Prospectively gated axial CT coronary angiography: preliminary experiences with a novel low-dose technique.

Authors:  Oliver Klass; Martin Jeltsch; Sebastian Feuerlein; Horst Brunner; Hans-Dieter Nagel; Matthew J Walker; Hans-Juergen Brambs; Martin H K Hoffmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Electroanatomic mapping systems (CARTO/EnSite NavX) vs. conventional mapping for ablation procedures in a training program.

Authors:  Jorge Romero; Florentino Lupercio; David Goodman-Meza; Juan Carlos Ruiz; David F Briceno; John D Fisher; Jay Gross; Kevin Ferrick; Soo Kim; Luigi Di Biase; Mario J Garcia; Andrew Krumerman
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Prospectively gated axial CT coronary angiography: comparison of image quality and effective radiation dose between 64- and 256-slice CT.

Authors:  Oliver Klass; Matthew Walker; Anne Siebach; Tina Stuber; Sebastian Feuerlein; Markus Juchems; Martin H K Hoffmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Retrospective study of patients radiation dose during cardiac catheterization procedures.

Authors:  Beverley Osei; Lu Xu; Amanda Johnston; Sara Darko; Johnson Darko; Ernest Osei
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Patient radiation doses in interventional cardiology procedures.

Authors:  Ioannis Pantos; Georgios Patatoukas; Demosthenes G Katritsis; Efstathios Efstathopoulos
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2009-01

10.  Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation dose.

Authors:  Roshan S Livingstone; David Chase; Anna Varghese; Paul V George; Oommen K George
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.