Literature DB >> 11063107

Frameless stereotactic neurosurgery using intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging: stereotactic brain biopsy.

T M Moriarty1, A Quinones-Hinojosa, P S Larson, E Alexander, P L Gleason, R B Schwartz, F A Jolesz, P M Black.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the application accuracy of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging for frameless stereotactic surgery, and to evaluate the performance of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging for the brain biopsy, a standard stereotactic procedure.
METHODS: A series of spatial coordinate and phantom experiments were performed to analyze the application accuracy of the system. A prospective analysis of 68 consecutive patients undergoing stereotactic brain biopsy was then performed.
RESULTS: The spatial coordinate experiments revealed a mean overall error in acquisition of 0.2 mm. The phantom experiments demonstrated a 1:1 correlation between the magnetic resonance image of a stereotactically guided probe and its relationship to a target and the actual relationship of the probe and target. Sixty-eight brain biopsies were successfully performed in all intracranial compartments except the sella. The radiographic abnormality was localized successfully in all patients (100%). Sixty-six (97.1%) of the biopsies yielded diagnostic tissue. Two biopsies (2.9%) were complicated by intraparenchymal hemorrhage. One expanding temporal lobe hemorrhage was evacuated by immediate craniotomy in the magnet with no postoperative sequelae. A deep hemorrhage from a lymphoma was managed conservatively with interval resolution of symptoms. There were no infections. There was no perioperative mortality.
CONCLUSION: Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging allows excellent target localization, provides true real-time imaging to account for anatomic changes during surgery, and permits intraoperative confirmation that the biopsy needle has reached the targeted lesion. Immediate postoperative imaging in the operating room allows assessment of adverse events and the potential for immediate management of hemorrhagic complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11063107     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-200011000-00023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  14 in total

1.  Assessment of image guided accuracy in a skull model: comparison of frameless stereotaxy techniques vs. frame-based localization.

Authors:  Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa; Marcus L Ware; Nader Sanai; Michael W McDermott
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Comparative study of application accuracy of two frameless neuronavigation systems: experimental error assessment quantifying registration methods and clinically influencing factors.

Authors:  Dimitrios Paraskevopoulos; Andreas Unterberg; Roland Metzner; Jens Dreyhaupt; Georg Eggers; Christian Rainer Wirtz
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Comparative effectiveness of frame-based, frameless, and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging-guided brain biopsy techniques.

Authors:  Yi Lu; Cecil Yeung; Alireza Radmanesh; Robert Wiemann; Peter M Black; Alexandra J Golby
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  An optimized system for interventional magnetic resonance imaging-guided stereotactic surgery: preliminary evaluation of targeting accuracy.

Authors:  Paul S Larson; Philip A Starr; Geoffrey Bates; Lisa Tansey; R Mark Richardson; Alastair J Martin
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Frame-based stereotactic biopsy remains an important diagnostic tool with distinct advantages over frameless stereotactic biopsy.

Authors:  Justin S Smith; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa; Nicholas M Barbaro; Michael W McDermott
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Use of a disposable real-time CT stereotactic navigator device for minimally invasive dog brain biopsy through a mini-burr hole.

Authors:  Thomas Flegel; Michael Podell; Philip A March; Donald W Chakeres
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulator placement using high-field interventional magnetic resonance imaging and a skull-mounted aiming device: technique and application accuracy.

Authors:  Philip A Starr; Alastair J Martin; Jill L Ostrem; Pekka Talke; Nadja Levesque; Paul S Larson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 8.  Neuronavigation in the surgical management of brain tumors: current and future trends.

Authors:  Daniel A Orringer; Alexandra Golby; Ferenc Jolesz
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.166

9.  Clinical outcomes of PD patients having bilateral STN DBS using high-field interventional MR-imaging for lead placement.

Authors:  Jill L Ostrem; Nicholas B Galifianakis; Leslie C Markun; Jamie K Grace; Alastair J Martin; Philip A Starr; Paul S Larson
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 1.876

Review 10.  Intraoperative Imaging for High-Grade Glioma Surgery.

Authors:  Thomas Noh; Martina Mustroph; Alexandra J Golby
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.509

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.