INTRODUCTION: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is transmitted orally, replicates in the oropharynx and establishes life-long latency in human B lymphocytes. T-cell responses to latent and lytic/replicative cycle proteins are readily detectable in peripheral blood from healthy EBV-seropositive individuals. EBV has also been detected within synovial tissue, and T-cell responses to EBV lytic proteins have been reported in synovial fluid from a patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This raises the question regarding whether T cells specific for certain viruses might be present at high frequencies within synovial fluid and whether such T cells might be activated or able to secrete cytokines. If so, they might play a 'bystander' role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory joint disease. OBJECTIVES: To quantify and characterize T cells that are specific for epitopes from EBV, cytomegalovirus (CMV) and influenza in peripheral blood and synovial fluid from patients with arthritis. METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and synovial fluid mononuclear cells (SFMCs) were obtained from patients with inflammatory arthritis (including those with RA, osteoarthritis, psoriatic arthritis and reactive arthritis). Samples from human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-A2-positive donors were stained with fluorescent-labelled tetramers of HLA-A2 complexed with the GLCTLVAML peptide epitope from the EBV lytic cycle protein BMLF1, the GILGFVFTL peptide epitope from the influenza A matrix protein, or the NLVPMVATV epitope from the CMV pp65 protein. Samples from HLA-B8-positive donors were stained with fluorescent-labelled tetramers of HLA-B8 complexed with the RAKFKQLL peptide epitope from the EBV lytic protein BZLF1 or the FLRGRAYGL peptide epitope from the EBV latent protein EBNA3A. All samples were costained with an antibody specific for CD8. CD4+ T cells were not analyzed. Selected samples were costained with antibodies specific for cell-surface glycoproteins, in order to determine the phenotype of the T cells within the joint and the periphery. Functional assays to detect release of IFN- or tumour necrosis factor (TNF)- were also performed on some samples. RESULTS: The first group of 15 patients included 10 patients with RA, one patient with reactive arthritis, one patient with psoriatic arthritis and three patients with osteoarthritis. Of these, 11 were HLA-A2 positive and five were HLA-B8 positive. We used HLA-peptide tetrameric complexes to analyze the frequency of EBV-specific T cells in PBMCs and SFMCs (Figs 1 and 2). Clear enrichment of CD8+ T cells specific for epitopes from the EBV lytic cycle proteins was seen within synovial fluid from almost all donors studied, including patients with psoriatic arthritis and osteoarthritis and those with RA. In donor RhA6, 9.5% of CD8+ SFMCs were specific for the HLA-A2 restricted GLCTLVAML epitope, compared with 0.5% of CD8+ PBMCs. Likewise in a donor with osteoarthritis (NR4), 15.5% of CD8+ SFMCs were specific for the HLA-B8-restricted RAKFKQLL epitope, compared with 0.4% of CD8+ PBMCs. In contrast, we did not find enrichment of T cells specific for the HLA-B8-restricted FLRGRAYGL epitope (from the latent protein EBNA3A) within SFMCs compared with PBMCs in any donors. In selected individuals we performed ELISpot assays to detect IFN- secreted by SFMCs and PBMCs after a short incubation in vitro with peptide epitopes from EBV lytic proteins. These assays confirmed enrichment of T cells specific for epitopes from EBV lytic proteins within synovial fluid and showed that subpopulations of these cells were able to secrete proinflammatory cytokines after short-term stimulation. We used a HLA-A2/GILGFVFTL tetramer to stain PBMCs and SFMCs from six HLA-A2-positive patients. The proportion of T cells specific for this influenza epitope was low (<0.2%) in all donors studied, and we did not find any enrichment within SFMCs. We had access to SFMCs only from a second group of four HLA-A2-positive patients with RA. A tetramer of HLA-A2 complexed to the NLVPMVATV epitope from the CMV pp65 protein reacted with subpopulations of CD8+ SFMCs in all four donors, with frequencies of 0.2, 0.5, 2.3 and 13.9%. SFMCs from all four donors secreted TNF after short-term incubation with COS cells transfected with HLA-A2 and pp65 complementary DNA. We analyzed the phenotype of virus-specific cells within PBMCs and SFMCs in three donors. The SFMC virus-specific T cells were more highly activated than those in PBMCs, as evidenced by expression of high levels of CD69 and HLA-DR. A greater proportion of SFMCs were CD38+, CD62L low, CD45RO bright, CD45RA dim, CD57+ and CD28- when compared with PBMCs. DISCUSSION: This work shows that T cells specific for certain epitopes from viral proteins are present at very high frequencies (up to 15.5% of CD8+ T cells) within SFMCs taken from patients with inflammatory joint disease. This enrichment does not reflect a generalized enrichment for the 'memory pool' of T cells; we did not find enrichment of T cells specific for the GILGFVFTL epitope from influenza A or for the FLRGRAYGL epitope from the EBV latent protein EBNA3A, whereas we found clear enrichment of T cells specific for the GLCTLVAML epitope from the EBV lytic protein BMLF1 and for the RAKFKQLL epitope from the EBV lytic protein BZLF1. The enrichment might reflect preferential recruitment of subpopulations of virus-specific T cells, perhaps based on expression of selectins, chemokine receptors or integrins. Alternatively, T cells specific for certain viral epitopes may be stimulated to proliferate within the joint, by viral antigens themselves or by cross-reactive self-antigens. Finally, it is theoretically possible that subpopulations of T cells within the joint are preferentially protected from apoptotic cell death. Whatever the explanation, the virus-specific T cells are present at high frequency, are activated and are able to secrete proinflammatory cytokines. They could potentially interact with synoviocytes and contribute to the maintenance of inflammation within joints in many different forms of inflammatory arthritis.
INTRODUCTION: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is transmitted orally, replicates in the oropharynx and establishes life-long latency in human B lymphocytes. T-cell responses to latent and lytic/replicative cycle proteins are readily detectable in peripheral blood from healthy EBV-seropositive individuals. EBV has also been detected within synovial tissue, and T-cell responses to EBV lytic proteins have been reported in synovial fluid from a patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This raises the question regarding whether T cells specific for certain viruses might be present at high frequencies within synovial fluid and whether such T cells might be activated or able to secrete cytokines. If so, they might play a 'bystander' role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory joint disease. OBJECTIVES: To quantify and characterize T cells that are specific for epitopes from EBV, cytomegalovirus (CMV) and influenza in peripheral blood and synovial fluid from patients with arthritis. METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and synovial fluid mononuclear cells (SFMCs) were obtained from patients with inflammatory arthritis (including those with RA, osteoarthritis, psoriatic arthritis and reactive arthritis). Samples from human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-A2-positive donors were stained with fluorescent-labelled tetramers of HLA-A2 complexed with the GLCTLVAML peptide epitope from the EBV lytic cycle protein BMLF1, the GILGFVFTL peptide epitope from the influenza A matrix protein, or the NLVPMVATV epitope from the CMV pp65 protein. Samples from HLA-B8-positive donors were stained with fluorescent-labelled tetramers of HLA-B8 complexed with the RAKFKQLL peptide epitope from the EBV lytic protein BZLF1 or the FLRGRAYGL peptide epitope from the EBV latent protein EBNA3A. All samples were costained with an antibody specific for CD8. CD4+ T cells were not analyzed. Selected samples were costained with antibodies specific for cell-surface glycoproteins, in order to determine the phenotype of the T cells within the joint and the periphery. Functional assays to detect release of IFN- or tumour necrosis factor (TNF)- were also performed on some samples. RESULTS: The first group of 15 patients included 10 patients with RA, one patient with reactive arthritis, one patient with psoriatic arthritis and three patients with osteoarthritis. Of these, 11 were HLA-A2 positive and five were HLA-B8 positive. We used HLA-peptide tetrameric complexes to analyze the frequency of EBV-specific T cells in PBMCs and SFMCs (Figs 1 and 2). Clear enrichment of CD8+ T cells specific for epitopes from the EBV lytic cycle proteins was seen within synovial fluid from almost all donors studied, including patients with psoriatic arthritis and osteoarthritis and those with RA. In donor RhA6, 9.5% of CD8+ SFMCs were specific for the HLA-A2 restricted GLCTLVAML epitope, compared with 0.5% of CD8+ PBMCs. Likewise in a donor with osteoarthritis (NR4), 15.5% of CD8+ SFMCs were specific for the HLA-B8-restricted RAKFKQLL epitope, compared with 0.4% of CD8+ PBMCs. In contrast, we did not find enrichment of T cells specific for the HLA-B8-restricted FLRGRAYGL epitope (from the latent protein EBNA3A) within SFMCs compared with PBMCs in any donors. In selected individuals we performed ELISpot assays to detect IFN- secreted by SFMCs and PBMCs after a short incubation in vitro with peptide epitopes from EBV lytic proteins. These assays confirmed enrichment of T cells specific for epitopes from EBV lytic proteins within synovial fluid and showed that subpopulations of these cells were able to secrete proinflammatory cytokines after short-term stimulation. We used a HLA-A2/GILGFVFTL tetramer to stain PBMCs and SFMCs from six HLA-A2-positive patients. The proportion of T cells specific for this influenza epitope was low (<0.2%) in all donors studied, and we did not find any enrichment within SFMCs. We had access to SFMCs only from a second group of four HLA-A2-positive patients with RA. A tetramer of HLA-A2 complexed to the NLVPMVATV epitope from the CMV pp65 protein reacted with subpopulations of CD8+ SFMCs in all four donors, with frequencies of 0.2, 0.5, 2.3 and 13.9%. SFMCs from all four donors secreted TNF after short-term incubation with COS cells transfected with HLA-A2 and pp65 complementary DNA. We analyzed the phenotype of virus-specific cells within PBMCs and SFMCs in three donors. The SFMC virus-specific T cells were more highly activated than those in PBMCs, as evidenced by expression of high levels of CD69 and HLA-DR. A greater proportion of SFMCs were CD38+, CD62L low, CD45RO bright, CD45RA dim, CD57+ and CD28- when compared with PBMCs. DISCUSSION: This work shows that T cells specific for certain epitopes from viral proteins are present at very high frequencies (up to 15.5% of CD8+ T cells) within SFMCs taken from patients with inflammatory joint disease. This enrichment does not reflect a generalized enrichment for the 'memory pool' of T cells; we did not find enrichment of T cells specific for the GILGFVFTL epitope from influenza A or for the FLRGRAYGL epitope from the EBV latent protein EBNA3A, whereas we found clear enrichment of T cells specific for the GLCTLVAML epitope from the EBV lytic protein BMLF1 and for the RAKFKQLL epitope from the EBV lytic protein BZLF1. The enrichment might reflect preferential recruitment of subpopulations of virus-specific T cells, perhaps based on expression of selectins, chemokine receptors or integrins. Alternatively, T cells specific for certain viral epitopes may be stimulated to proliferate within the joint, by viral antigens themselves or by cross-reactive self-antigens. Finally, it is theoretically possible that subpopulations of T cells within the joint are preferentially protected from apoptotic cell death. Whatever the explanation, the virus-specific T cells are present at high frequency, are activated and are able to secrete proinflammatory cytokines. They could potentially interact with synoviocytes and contribute to the maintenance of inflammation within joints in many different forms of inflammatory arthritis.
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a common gammaherpesvirus that infects
over 90% of individuals worldwide [1]. The virus is
transmitted orally, replicates in the oropharynx and subsequently establishes
life-long latent infection of B lymphocytes [2].
Replicative infection is associated with the expression of approximately 70EBV
'lytic' proteins, whereas latent infection is associated with the
expression of up to nine 'latent' proteins [3,4]. The cellular immune response plays
a crucial role in controlling EBV infection. T-cell responses to EBV latent
proteins have been well studied and are easily detectable in healthy
EBV-seropositive individuals [5,6,7]. More recently, responses to some of
the EBV lytic cycle proteins have also been described [7,8,9,10]; reactivities to these antigens are frequently found to be
more abundant than those directed against the EBV latent antigens in healthy
EBV carriers [7,9,10].An association between EBV and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was first
proposed on the basis of high titres of EBV-specific antibodies found in some
patients with RA [11,12]. The
observation that some of the anti-EBV antibodies were cross-reactive with
autoantigens such as collagen was put forward as a further argument in support
of the link [13]. The importance of these findings in
the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis has never been established,
however. More recently the cloning of T cells that are specific for EBV
antigens from synovial fluid taken from a patient with RA [14] has reopened the debate regarding the importance of this
virus in the aetiology of arthritis. David-Ameline et al [15] showed that a large proportion of T-cell clones derived
from synovial fluid taken from one individual with RA, under polyclonal
activation conditions, recognized EBV-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines in
an human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-restricted manner. Subsequent work revealed
that these T-cell clones recognized epitopes from EBV lytic cycle proteins
[14]. Analysis of the T-cell receptor use of the
EBV-specific T cell clones and of the T-cell receptor repertoire of synovial
fluid lymphocytes [14,15]
suggested that the EBV-specific T cells were clonally expanded within the
synovial fluid from this donor. In some other donors, short-term T-cell lines
derived from synovial fluid lymphocytes, but not those derived from peripheral
blood lymphocytes, secreted low levels of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) in
response to stimulation with an EBV antigen [14,16]. These results suggested that EBV-specific T cells might
form a component of joint infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with RA.In the present study we used tetrameric HLA-peptide complexes [17] to investigate the T-cell response to EBV, cytomegalovirus
(CMV) and influenza in individuals with inflammatory arthritis. We made
tetramers of HLA molecules complexed to peptide epitopes from EBV latent and
lytic proteins [7,10], to an
epitope from a CMV structural protein [18] and to an
epitope from influenza A matrix protein [19]. We used
these tetramers to quantify and characterize virus-specific CD8+ T
cells within samples of peripheral blood and synovial fluid taken from patients
with inflammatory arthritis. The experiments show that CD8+ T cells
specific for certain viral antigens are enriched within synovial fluid. The
enrichment could reflect recruitment into, stimulation within or preferential
survival within inflamed joints. The virus-specific T cells are activated and
subpopulations are able to secrete proinflammatory cytokines. These T cells
could therefore interact with synoviocytes and play a role in the maintenance
of inflammation in chronic arthritis.
Materials and methods
Patient samples
Samples of synovial fluid and peripheral venous blood were initially
obtained from a group of 15 EBV-seropositive patients, 13 of whom were HLA-A2
positive and/or HLA-B8 positive. Ten patients (RhA1-RhA10) suffered from RA,
one from reactive arthritis (NR1), one from psoriatic arthritis (NR2) and three
from osteoarthritis (NR3-NR5). Details of these patients are given in Table
1. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and
synovial fluid mononuclear cells (SFMCs) were isolated using Lymphoprep
(Nycomed Pharma, Oslo, Norway) gradient centrifugation and cryopreserved in 10%
dimethyl sulphoxide, 90% fetal calf syndrome at -70°C. Only synovial
lymphocytes were available for analysis from a smaller second group of
HLA-A2-positive RApatients (RA3, RA11, RA14 and RA15), whose clinical status
has been described elsewhere [16].
Table 1
Patient details
Patients
HLA-A
HLA-B
Diagnosis
Group 1
RhA1
2, 29
44, 49
Rheumatoid arthritis
RhA2
2, 29
39, 44
Rheumatoid arthritis
RhA3
2, 3
7, 62
Rheumatoid arthritis
RhA4
2, 31
7, 8
Rheumatoid arthritis
RhA5
1, 2
8, 62
Rheumatoid arthritis
RhA6
2
-
Rheumatoid arthritis
RhA7
1, 29
8, 44
Rheumatoid arthritis
RhA8
2, 30
44, 52
Rheumatoid arthritis
RhA9
2, 3
7, 35
Rheumatoid arthritis
RhA10
29, 32
40, 44
Rheumatoid arthritis
NR1
1,2
27,49
Reactive arthritis
NR2
2, 36
8, 60
Psoriatic arthritis
NR3
1, 2
7, 62
Osteoarthritis
NR4
1, 31
40, 52
Osteoarthritis
NR5
-
8
Osteoarthritis
Group 2
RA3
1, 2
8, 44
Rheumatoid arthritis
RA11
2
27, 44
Rheumatoid arthritis
RA14
2
15, 44
Rheumatoid arthritis
RA15
2, 11
8, 27
Rheumatoid arthritis
The HLA-B type of patient RhA6 and the HLA-A type of patient NR5
Were not determined.
Human leucocyte antigen typing
Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood using a Puregene kit
(Gentra systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to the manufacturer's
instructions. Each patient was tissue typed using polymerase chain reaction, as
previously described [20]. HLA-A and HLA-B types are
summarized in Table 1.
Tetrameric class I human leucocyte antigen-peptide complexes.
HLA-peptide tetramers were produced as previously described [7,10]. Briefly, recombinant class I
heavy chain or β2-microglobulin was produced in Escherichia
coli cells transformed with the relevant expression plasmids. Expression
of the heavy chain was limited to the extracellular domain and the sequence of
this domain was modified by the addition of a substrate sequence for BirA
biotinylation at the carboxyl terminus. The HLA-peptide complexes were folded
in vitro using 30mg heavy chain, 25mg β2-microglobulin
and 10mg peptide, then biotinylated using purified BirA enzyme (Avidity,
Denvery, CO, USA). The biotinylated complexes were recovered by fast
performance liquid chromatography (FPLC) purification and ion exchange
chromatography. Tetramers were made by mixing biotinylated protein complex with
streptavidin-phycoerythrin (PE) at a molar ratio of 4:1. The three HLA-A2
tetrameric complexes synthesized for this study contained either the influenza
A virus matrix peptide GILGFVFTL [19] (A2/FluM
tetramer), the EBVBMLF1 peptide GLCTLVAML [9,14] (A2/GLC tetramer), or the CMV pp65 peptide NLVPMVATV
[18] (A2/NLV tetramer). Two HLA-B8 tetramers were also
made, with the EBV EBNA3A peptide FLRGRAYGL [21] (B8/FLR
tetramer), or the EBVBZLF1 peptide RAKFKQLL [8,9] (B8/RAK tetramer).
ELISpot assay for IFN-γ release by stimulated T cells
This assay was used to detect IFN-γ production by T cells in
fresh samples of PBMCs and SFMCs on antigen stimulation. Ninety-six-well
polyvinylidene difluoride backed plates (Millipore, Watford, UK) were precoated
with 15 μ g/ml of anti-IFN-γ monoclonal antibody 1-DIK(Mabtech,
Stockholm, Sweden). PBMCs were added in duplicate wells at
2.5×105, 1.25×105 and 6.25×104
cells/well and incubated overnight at 37°C, 5% carbon dioxide with the
exact 8-mer or 9-mer peptide antigen(2 μ mol/l final concentration). The
cells were discarded the following day and the second biotinylated
anti-IFN-γ mono-clonal antibody, 7-B6-1 biotin (Mabtech, Stockholm,
Sweden), was added at 1 μ g/ml and left for 3h at room temperature,
followed by streptavidin-conjugated alkaline phosphatase (Mabtech, Stockholm,
Sweden) for a further 2h. Individual cytokine-producing cells were detected as
dark spots after a 30-min reaction with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate
and nitroblue tetrazolium using a pre-mixed alkaline phosphatase conjugate
substrate kit (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA, USA). The spots were counted under a
dissection microscope. The number of specific responders was calculated after
subtracting negative control values.
COS transfections and T cell stimulation assay
COS cells were transfected with HLA-A2 and pp65 complementary DNA as
previously described [16]. CD8+ SFMCs
(104 and 105) were incubated with the transfected COS
cells for 6h. The culture supernatant was harvested and tested for TNF-α
content by measuring culture supernatant cytotoxicity against Wehi 164 clone 13
in a colorimetric assay as previously described [16].
Cell staining and flow cytometry
PBMCs were incubated for 30min in phosphate-buffered saline with
0.16% bovine serum albumin and 0.1% sodium azide, containing 0.5mg/ml
phycoerythrin-labelled tetrameric complex, washed and then stained on ice with
saturating amounts of an anti-CD8 monoclonal antibody directly conjugated to
Tricolor (Caltag Laboratories, San Francisco, CA, USA). For phenotypic
analysis, selected samples were also incubated with one of a panel of
mono-clonal antibodies directed against cell-surface markers. This panel
consisted of anti-CD28 fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (Immunotech,
Marseilles, France), anti-CD45RA FITC (Immunotech, Marseilles, France),
anti-CD45RO FITC (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark), anti-CD57 FITC (Becton-Dickinson,
Mountain View, CA, USA), anti-CD62L FITC (Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA),
anti-CD69 FITC (DAKO) and anti-HLA DR FITC (DAKO).All samples were fixed in 2% formaldehyde and analyzed using a
fluorescent antibody cell sorter using CELLQuest software (Becton-Dickinson).
For two-colour analysis 50000 live cells were analyzed. For three-colour
analysis 200000 live cells were analyzed. In each experiment the lymphocyte
pool was identified using forward and side scatter analysis and markers were
set to analyze the CD8hi subset of CD3+ T cells.
CD4+ T-cell responses were not analyzed in the present study.
Results
Presence of T cells specific for Epstein-Barr virus in synovial
fluid
In the first group of patients we used HLA-peptide tetrameric
complexes to analyze the frequency of CD8+ T cells specific for two
EBV lytic protein epitopes, the HLA-A2 restricted epitope (GLCTLVAML) from
BMLF1 [9,14] and the HLA-B8
restricted epitope (RAKFKQLL) from BZLF1 [8,9], and for an EBV latent protein epitope, the HLA-B8
restricted epitope (FLRGRAYGL) from EBNA3A [21].We initially studied 11 HLA-A2+ patients with
inflammatory arthritis. In patient RhA6, 9.5% of CD8+ T cells within
synovial fluid were specific for the GLCTLVAML epitope from BMLF1, whereas only
0.5% CD8+ T cells within peripheral blood were specific for this
epitope (Figs 1a and 2a). Likewise
in patient RhA5, T cells that were specific for the GLCTLVAML epitope were
clearly enriched within synovial fluid (4.5% of CD8+ T cells) when
compared with peripheral blood (1.0%; Figs 1b and
2a). In four of the six other HLA-A2+
individuals with RA (RhA2, RhA3, RhA8, RhA9), we also found higher frequencies
of T cells specific for GLCTLVAML in synovial fluid than in peripheral blood
(Fig. 2a). This finding was not restricted to patients
with RA; we found enrichment of GLCTLVAML-specific T cells in synovial fluid
taken from patients with psoriatic arthritis (NR2) and osteoarthritis (NR3;
Fig. 2a).
Figure 1
Staining of paired samples of peripheral blood and synovial fluid
with human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-peptide tetrameric complexes. Paired samples
of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs; left column) and synovial fluid
mononuclear cells (SFMCs; right column) from donors (a) RhA6, (b,
c) RhA5 and (d) RhA7 were stained with a monoclonal antibody that
was specific for CD8 and with (a, b) the A2/GLCTLVAML tetramer or (c,
d) the B8/RAKFKQLL tetramer. The percentage frequency of CD8+ T
cells that reacted with the tetrameric complexes is shown; 50 000 live cells
were included in the analysis.
Figure 2
T cells specific for the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) lytic protein
epitopes GLCTLVAML and RAKFKQLL are enriched within synovial fluid. Paired
samples of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and synovial fluid
mononuclear cells (SFMCs) were stained with (a) the A2/GLCTLVAML
tetramer or (b) the B8/RAKFKQLL tetramer together with a monoclonal
antibodies specific for CD8. The percentage of CD8+ T cells that
react with the relevant tetrameric complex is shown. L, left knee; R, right
knee.
We identified five HLA-B8+ patients, three of whom
suffered from RA (RhA4, RhA5, RhA7), one of whom had psoriatic arthritis (NR2)
and one of whom had osteoarthritis (NR5). In patient RhA5, 13.1%
CD8+ T cells within synovial fluid reacted with the B8-RAK
tetrameric complex compared with 4.3% within peripheral blood (Figs
1c and 2b). Similarly in patient
RhA7, we found that 7.3% of CD8+ T cells were specific for the
RAKFKQLL epitope in synovial fluid compared with 0.9% CD8+ T cells
within the periphery (Figs 1d and 2b). In the third RApatient, as well as in patients with
psoriatic arthritis and osteoarthritis, the frequencies of T cells specific for
the RAKFKQLL epitope were also much higher in synovial fluid than in peripheral
blood (Fig. 2b).T cells that were specific for the HLA-B8 restricted epitope
(FLRGRAYGL) from the EBV latent protein EBNA3A were either undetectable or
present at only very low frequencies (<0.1% of CD8+ T cells) in
three of the five HLA-B8+ patients studied. In donor RhA7 we found
FLRGRAYGL-specific T cells at a frequency of 0.5% CD8+ T cells in
peripheral blood and 0.4% CD8+ T cells in synovial fluid. In a
patient with osteoarthritis (NR4) we found FLRGRAYGL-specific T cells at a
frequency of 0.4% in peripheral blood and 0.2% in synovial fluid. Thus, using
this technique we did not find evidence for enrichment of T cells specific for
this EBV latent epitope within synovial fluid of patients with inflammatory
arthritis.In general the frequencies of EBV-reactive T cells within peripheral
blood of the patients studied were similar to those previously reported in
healthy individuals [7] using this technique, despite the
use of immunosuppressive drugs.In selected individuals we performed ELISpot assays to detect
IFN-γ secreted by SFMCs and PBMCs after a short incubation in
vitro with peptide epitopes from EBV lytic proteins (Fig. 3). We calculated that the estimates of frequency of
virus-specific T cells obtained with an ELISpot assay for IFN-γ secretion
were a mean of 19.9-fold and 20.1-fold lower than those obtained with tetramer
staining in peripheral blood and synovial fluid, respectively. We have
previously shown that in healthy control individuals estimates of frequency of
EBV-specific T cells obtained with the ELISpot assay are a mean of 4.4-fold
lower than those obtained by staining with tetrameric complexes [7]. Thus, the ability of the virus-specific T cells to secrete
IFN-γ appeared to be impaired both in peripheral blood and synovial fluid
in the present patient group. The correlation between the numbers of T cells
that were detected using an ELISpot assay versus tetramer staining was
relatively poor in this group of patients, suggesting interindividual and
intersite differences in the functional capacity of the antigen-specific T
cells. Despite these limitations, the results of the assays showed enrichment
for T cells that were specific for epitopes from EBV lytic proteins within
synovial fluid, and showed that subpopulations of these cells are able to
secrete proinflammatory cytokines after short-term stimulation.
Figure 3
Frequency of IFN-γ secreting antigen-specific T cells
detected using an ELISpot assay. ELISpot assays to detect IFN-γ secreted
by T cells following short-term incubation with (a) the GLCTLVAML
peptide or (b) the RAKFKQLL peptide were performed on paired samples of
peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and synovial fluid mononuclear cells
(SFMCs). The number of spots detected per 106 mononuclear cells is
shown.
T cells specific for cytomegalovirus may also be present at high
frequencies within synovial fluid
In light of recent results that suggest increased responses of
synovial lymphocytes from some RApatients to CMV antigens derived from pp65
and IE1 proteins [16], we also assessed the number of
SFMCs specific for a CMV epitope in a second group of four patients. HLA-A2
tetramers carrying a CMV-derived epitope (pp65 NLVPMVATV) were made and used to
stain CD8+ synovial fluid lymphocytes from four HLA-A2+
RApatients (RA3, RA11, RA14 and RA15). Paired samples of peripheral blood from
these donors were not available for comparative analysis. The frequency of
A2/NLV-reactive cells varied greatly from one patient to another, but reached
up to 13.9% in one patient (RA15; Table 2). Consistent
with these findings, CD8+ SFMCs from these donors secreted
TNF-α after short-term incubation with COS cells transfected with HLA-A2
and pp65 complementary DNA (Table 2) [16].
Table 2
Frequency of, and tumour necrosis factor secretion by, Synovial T
cells specific for cytomegalovirus
TNF response (pg/ml)
Patient
HLA-A2-NLV+/CD8+ T cells (%)
104
105
RA3
0.2
3
45
RA11
2.3
21
102
RA14
0.5
10
61
RA15
13.9
60
70
Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) response was estimated by titrating
the mononuclear cells after short-term incubation with COS cells transfected
with human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-A2 and pp65 complementary DNA, as described
by Scotet et al [16].
T cells specific for influenza A are not present at high
frequencies within synovial fluid
We used a tetramer of HLA-A2 complexed with the GILGFVFTL epitope
from influenza A matrix protein to stain paired samples of peripheral blood and
synovial fluid from six HLA-A2 patients, four of whom had RA, one of whom had
osteoarthritis and one of whom had reactive arthritis. Influenza-specific
CD8+ T cells were undetectable in both PBMC and SFMC preparations in
four donors. The frequencies of the influenza-specific CD8+ T cells
in the other two donors were very low (<0.2%) in peripheral blood and showed
no enrichment within synovial fluid.
Phenotype of Epstein-Barr virus-specific T lymphocytes within
peripheral blood and synovial fluid
We analyzed expression of cell surface markers of activation and
differentiation by EBV antigen-specific cells in paired samples of peripheral
blood and synovial fluid in donor RhA7 (Figs 4 and
5). CD69 and HLA-DR are often upregulated by activated
CD8+ T cells; these molecules were found to be expressed at higher
levels on RAKFKQLL-specific T cells within synovial fluid than in those found
in peripheral blood (Fig. 4). Coexpression of CD69 and
HLA-DR represents an unusual phenotype, but one that has been described
previously within the joint [22]. CD38 expression has
also been used to identify activated cells; this molecule was expressed on 56%
of RAKFKQLL-specific T cells within the joint, compared with on 15% within the
periphery (Fig. 5a).
Figure 4
Expression of CD69 and human leucocyte antigen (HLA) DR by
B8-RAKFKQLL-specific T cells in peripheral blood and synovial fluid from
patient RhA7. Samples of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (dashed lines) and
synovial fluid mononuclear cells (continuous lines) were stained with the
B8/RAKFKQLL tetramer, with anti-CD8 and with monoclonal antibodies specific for
CD69 or HLA-DR; 200 000 live cells were analyzed, and expression of CD69 and
HLA-DR by the populations of CD8+ B8/RAKFKQLL tetramer reactive cells is shown.
FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate
Figure 5
The phenotype of RAKFKQLL-specific T cells in peripheral blood and
synovial fluid from patient RhA7. Samples of peripheral blood mononuclear cells
(PBMCs; left column) and synovial fluid mononuclear cells (SFMCs; right column)
were stained with anti-CD8, the B8/RAKFKQLL tetramer and with monocloncal
antibodies specific for (a) CD38, (b) CD62L, (c) CD45RA,
(d) CD45RO, (e) CD57 and (f) CD28. The percentage
frequency of CD8+ tetramer reactive cells that stain with the
phenotypic markers are shown; 200000 live cells were included in the analysis.
FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate.
L-selectin (CD62L) is downregulated after antigen stimulation, with
expression often being regained in the stable memory state [23]. This molecule was expressed on only 5% of the
RAKFKQLL-specific synovial fluid lymphocytes, compared with on 23% of the cells
within peripheral blood (Fig. 5b).CD45RA was not expressed at high levels by significant numbers of
RAKFKQLL-specific cells within synovial fluid, but was expressed by 25% of
those within peripheral blood (Fig. 5c). The vast
majority of RAKFKQLL-specific cells within synovial fluid were CD45RO bright;
69% of these antigen-specific cells within the periphery expressed CD45RO
[24] (Fig. 5d).Expression of CD57, a glycoprotein of unknown function, is thought
to occur on CD8+ T cells in a late differentiation compartment
[25]. This molecule was expressed on 9% of
RAKFKQLL-specific T cells within peripheral blood and on 55% of these cells
within synovial fluid (Fig. 5e).CD28 is a costimulatory molecule that binds B7; down-regulation of
CD28 expression is associated with a diminished proliferative capacity and may
reflect a state of late-terminal differentiation [26].
This molecule was expressed on 55% of RAKFKQLL-specific T cells within
peripheral blood and on 39% of T cells in synovial fluid (Fig. 5f).Analysis of GLCTLVAML-specific T cells within peripheral blood and
synovial fluid from two further donors, with RA and osteoarthritis,
respectively, revealed the same pattern, with EBV-specific T cells within the
synovial fluid showing an increase in markers of activation and late
differentiation as compared with those in peripheral blood (data not
shown).
Discussion
The present study shows that virus-specific CD8+ T cells
are enriched in synovial fluid from individuals with inflammatory arthritis. In
particular, CD8+ T cells specific for two epitopes from EBV lytic
cycle antigens (GLCTLVAML from BMLF1 and RAKFKQLL from BZLF1) may be present at
very high frequency within the joints of EBV-seropositive patients. In donor
RhA5, staining with tetrameric HLA-peptide complexes showed that T cells
specific for these two epitopes accounted for 17.6% of all CD8+ T
cells within synovial fluid (over 106 cells in a single joint
aspirate). The findings described are not specific for RA and we obtained
similar results in a patient with psoriatic arthritis (NR2) and in patients
with osteoarthritis (NR3 and NR4). We also found very large numbers of T cells
specific for an epitope (NLVPMVATV) from the CMV tegument protein pp65 in one
patient with RA, and clearly detectable populations of T cells specific for
this epitope in three other patients with RA. We did not find high frequencies
of T cells specific for an epitope (FLRGRAYGL) from the EBV latent protein
EBNA3A or of T cells specific for an epitope (GILGFVFTL) from the influenza A
matrix protein within SFMCs in the patients studied. Thus, the synovial T-cell
population is not simply a 'concentrated' pool of peripheral memory
T cells. Many factors may contribute to the enrichment of T cells specific for
certain viral antigens within the joint; these include preferential migration
of subsets of T cells, local stimulation within the joint and protection from
apoptotic cell death within the joint.T-cell migration to sites of inflammation is a carefully controlled
process [27,28,29] and T cells with an activated and memory phenotype may be
preferentially recruited to a site of inflammation. The experiments described
here show that the antigen-specific T cells within PBMCs are relatively more
common in the CD62Llo, CD45RO+ and CD45RA-
compartments than in the CD62Lhi, CD45RO- and
CD45RA+ compartments. Thus, selection for activated/memory T cells
is likely to account at least partly for the observed enrichment of
virus-specific T cells within the joints. Current experiments are aimed at
investigating the importance of expression of integrins and chemokine receptors
by T cells in the recruitment of virus-specific T cells into joints [27,30,31].It is also possible that T cells are stimulated to proliferate within
the joints. Preliminary experiments (unpublished data) suggest that a small
proportion of CD8+ T cells (usually <5%), including some
EBV-specific T cells, are in cell cycle within synovial fluid. the stimulus to
proliferation might be the relevant viral antigen itself. CMV dna has been
detected in rheumatoid synovium [32]. Bcells as well as
T cells are recruited into inflamed joints and, in EBV-seropositive
individuals, a subpopulation of these Bcells will be latently infected with
EBV. One might therefore expect to find this virus within inflamed joints.
Although some early studies [33] found no evidence of
EBV infection within joints, other reports [34,35] described detection of EBV DNA
within the joints of patients with RA and one study [36]
described the use of in situ hybridization to detect EBV-encoded small
RNA1 and LMP1 transcripts in synovial lining cells from RApatients.
Furthermore Koide et al [37] derived a
fibroblastoid cell line that expressed EBV proteins from the synovium of a
patient with RA. Very recently, Edinger et al [38] reported detection of EBV DNA within synovia from 10 out
of 11 patients with RA. That study also provides evidence of transcription of
EBV EBER1 and BZLF1 in samples of synovia from patients with RA and
osteoarthritis. Thus, expression of BZLF1 within the joint may be stimulating T
cells specific for the HLA-B8 restricted RAKFKQLL epitope from BZLF1.
Transcription of BMLF1 has, however, not been detected within synovial tissue,
suggesting that alternative mechanisms may be responsible for driving the
proliferation of CD8+ T cells specific for the HLA-A2 restricted
epitope (GLCTLVAML) from BMLF1. One possible alternative is that
antigen-presenting cells such as dendritic cells may take up EBV antigens and
subsequently be recruited to joints where they present epitopes from the EBV
antigens by 'cross-presentation' [39]. A
second possibility is that the virus-specific T cells are being stimulated by
cross-reactive self-antigens expressed within the joint. In favour of this is
the fact that a subpopulation of T cells specific for the HLA-B8 restricted
RAKFKQLL peptide epitope is able to cross-react with a self peptide from a
serine-threonine kinase [40].Relative resistance to apoptotic cell death is a further theoretical
factor that could influence the frequency of the virus-specific T cells within
the joint. Although there is evidence that T cells within the joint are
protected from apoptosis by type 1 IFN [41] there is no
obvious reason to believe that the T cells specific for the RAKFKQLL and
GLCTLVAML epitopes should survive more efficiently than other CD8+ T
cells.The results of the ELISpot assays for IFN-γ release after
incubation of SFMCs with peptide epitopes from EBV and of the assays for
TNF-α release after incubation of SFMCs with COS cells transfected with
HLA-A2 and CMV pp65 suggest that the T cells within the synovial fluid retain
their capacity to secrete proinflammatory cytokines. Within the joint, the
secretion of such cytokines could lead to activation of synoviocytes and hence
to the maintenance of inflammation [42]. Cell-cell
contact between the activated virus-specific T cells within the joint and the
synoviocyte population is a second mechanism whereby the virus-specific T cells
might interact with the indigenous cells within the joint and contribute to the
pathogenesis of inflammatory joint disease [43].Importantly, these experiments show that large numbers of T cells
within the joint are specific for epitopes from certain viral proteins. Many
previous studies analyzed T-cell receptor use of T cells within the joint and
found evidence of clonality, and concluded that the T cells are being driven by
a specific self-antigen. Paliard et al [44]
found that clonality was particularly marked within Vβ 14+ T
cells within synovial fluid and that Vβ 14+ T cells were not
well represented within peripheral blood of patients with RA. Those authors
suggested that a superantigen might have caused activation of Vβ
14+ T cells, with recruitment of selected Vβ 14+ T
cell clones into the joint followed by deletion of Vβ 14+ T
cells in the periphery.It will be interesting to analyze Vβ usage of our HLA-viral
peptide tetramer-reactive CD8+ T cells. From the work we have
described, it seems likely that at least some of the clonally expanded
populations of CD8+ T cells found in synovial fluid are specific for
viral antigens. The reasons for the presence of large numbers of synovial T
cells specific for certain viral epitopes and not others remain unclear, and
the role that these virus-specific 'bystander' T cells may play in
the maintenance of inflammation needs further investigation.
Authors: W L Lin; J E Fincke; L R Sharer; D S Monos; S Lu; J Gaughan; C D Platsoucas; E L Oleszak Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: J Söderholm; G Ahlén; A Kaul; L Frelin; M Alheim; C Barnfield; P Liljeström; O Weiland; D R Milich; R Bartenschlager; M Sällberg Journal: Gut Date: 2005-08-16 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Raquel Rollín; Roberto Alvarez-Lafuente; Fernando Marco; Luis López-Durán; José Antonio Hoyas; Juan Angel Jover; Benjamín Fernández-Gutiérrez Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2009-03-22 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Andrew D Hislop; Michael Kuo; Adrian B Drake-Lee; Arne N Akbar; Wolfgang Bergler; Nicolas Hammerschmitt; Naeem Khan; Umaimainthan Palendira; Alison M Leese; Judith M Timms; Andrew I Bell; Christopher D Buckley; Alan B Rickinson Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2005-08-18 Impact factor: 14.808