Literature DB >> 11059701

Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: distortion product otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period.

M P Gorga1, S J Norton, Y S Sininger, B Cone-Wesson, R C Folsom, B R Vohr, J E Widen, S T Neely.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: 1) To describe distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels, noise levels and signal to noise ratios (SNRs) for a wide range of frequencies and two stimulus levels in neonates and infants. 2) To describe the relations between these DPOAE measurements and age, test environment, baby state, and test time.
DESIGN: DPOAEs were measured in 2348 well babies without risk indicators, 353 well babies with at least one risk indicator, and 4478 graduates of neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). DPOAE and noise levels were measured at f2 frequencies of 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 kHz, and for primary levels (L1/L2) of 65/50 dB SPL and 75/75 dB SPL. Measurement-based stopping rules were used such that a test did not terminate unless the response was at least 3 dB above the mean noise floor + 2 SDs (SNR) for at least four of five test frequencies. The test would terminate, however, if these criteria were not met after 360 sec. Baby state, test environment, and other test factors were captured at the time of each test.
RESULTS: DPOAE levels, noise levels and SNRs were similar for well babies without risk indicators, well babies with risk indicators, and NICU graduates. There was a tendency for larger responses at f2 frequencies of 1.5 and 2.0 Hz, compared with 3.0 and 4.0 kHz; however, the noise levels systematically decreased as frequency increased, resulting in the most favorable SNRs at 3.0 and 4.0 kHz. Response levels were least and noise levels highest for an f2 frequency of 1.0 kHz. In addition, test time to achieve automatic stopping criteria was greatest for 1.0 kHz. With the exception of "active/alert" and "crying" babies, baby state had little influence on DPOAE measurements. Additionally, test environment had little impact on these measurements, at least for the environments in which babies were tested in this study. However, the lowest SNRs were observed for infants who were tested in functioning isolettes. Finally, there were some subtle age affects on DPOAE levels, with the infants born most prematurely producing the smallest responses, regardless of age at the time of test.
CONCLUSIONS: DPOAE measurements in neonates and infants result in robust responses in the vast majority of ears for f2 frequencies of at least 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 kHz. SNRs decrease as frequency decreases, making the measurements less reliable at 1.0 kHz. When considered along with test time, there may be little justification for including an f2 frequency at 1.0 kHz in newborn screening programs. It would appear that DPOAEs result in reliable measurements when tests are conducted in the environments in which babies typically are found. Finally, these data suggest that babies can be tested in those states of arousal that are most commonly encountered in the perinatal period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11059701     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200010000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  11 in total

1.  A validation and potential clinical application of multivariate analyses of distortion-product otoacoustic emission data.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Darcia M Dierking; Tiffany A Johnson; Kathryn L Beauchaine; Cassie A Garner; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Effects of background noise on recording of portable transient-evoked otoacoustic emission in newborn hearing screening.

Authors:  Husain Salina; Asma Abdullah; Siti Zamratol Mai-sarah Mukari; Mohd Tamil Azmi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Wideband reflectance in newborns: normative regions and relationship to hearing-screening results.

Authors:  Lisa L Hunter; M Patrick Feeney; Judi A Lapsley Miller; Patricia S Jeng; Susie Bohning
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Longitudinal Development of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Infants With Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Lisa L Hunter; Chelsea M Blankenship; Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; David K Brown; Annie McCune; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Li Lin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Optimizing Clinical Interpretation of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Infants.

Authors:  Chelsea M Blankenship; Lisa L Hunter; Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; David K Brown; Annie McCune; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Li Lin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 6.  Current audiological diagnostics.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoth; Izet Baljić
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

7.  Long-Term Variability of Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Infants and Children and Its Relation to Pediatric Ototoxicity Monitoring.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Kristin Knight; Garnett P McMillan; Laura E Dreisbach; Elsa Nelson; Marilyn Dille
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Changes in the DP-gram during the preterm and early postnatal period.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sandra I Oba; Rangasamy Ramanathan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Ear asymmetries in middle-ear, cochlear, and brainstem responses in human infants.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Michael P Gorga; Walt Jesteadt; Lynette M Smith
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Using benefit-cost ratio to select Universal Newborn Hearing Screening test criteria.

Authors:  Heather L Porter; Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.