INTRODUCTION: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with an increased production of a range of cytokines including tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and interleukin (IL)-1, which display potent proinflammatory actions that are thought to contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease. Although TNF-alpha seems to be the major cytokine in the inflammatory process, IL-1 is the key mediator with regard to cartilage and bone destruction. Apart from direct blockage of IL-1/TNF, regulation can be exerted at the level of modulatory cytokines such as IL-1 and IL-10. IL-4 is a pleiotropic T-cell derived cytokine that can exert either suppressive or stimulatory effects on different cell types, and was originally identified as a B-cell growth factor and regulator of humoral immune pathways. IL-4 is produced by activated CD4+T cells and it promotes the maturation of TH2 cells. IL-4 stimulates proliferation, differentiation and activation of several cell types, including fibroblasts, endothelial cells and epithelial cells. IL-4 is also known to be a potent anti-inflammatory cytokine that acts by inhibiting the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-12 by macrophages and monocytes. Moreover, IL-4 stimulates the synthesis of several cytokine inhibitors such as interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), soluble IL-1-receptor type II and TNF receptors IL-4 suppresses metalloproteinase production and stimulates tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 production in human mononuclear phagocytes and cartilage explants, indicating a protective effect of IL-4 towards extracellular matrix degradation. Furthermore, IL-4 inhibits both osteoclast activity and survival, and thereby blocks bone resorption in vitro. Of great importance is that IL-4 could not be detected in synovial fluid or in tissues. This absence of IL-4 in the joint probably contributes to the disturbance in the Th1/Th2 balance in chronic RA. Collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) is a widely used model of arthritis that displays several features of human RA. Recently it was demonstrated that the onset of CIA is under stringent control of IL-4 and IL-10. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that exposure to IL-4 during the immunization stage reduced onset and severity of CIA. However, after cessation of IL-4 treatment disease expression increased to control values. AIMS: Because it was reported that IL-4 suppresses several proinflammatory cytokines and matrix degrading enzymes and upregulates inhibitors of both cytokines and catabolic enzymes, we investigated the tissue protective effect of systemic IL-4 treatment using established murine CIA as a model. Potential synergy of low dosages of anti-inflammatory glucocorticosteroids and IL-4 was also evaluated. METHODS: DBA-1J/Bom mice were immunized with bovine type II collagen and boosted at day 21. Mice with established CIA were selected at day 28 after immunization and treated for days with IL-4, prednisolone, or combinations of prednisolone and IL-4. Arthritis score was monitored visually. Joint pathology was evaluated by histology, radiology and serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP). In addition, serum levels of IL-1Ra and anticollagen antibodies were determined. RESULTS: Treatment of established CIA with IL-4 (1microgram/day) resulted in suppression of disease activity as depicted in Figure 1. Of great interest is that, although 1 microgram/day IL-4 had only a moderate effect on the inflammatory component of the disease activity, it strongly reduced cartilage pathology, as determined by histological examination (Fig. 1). Moreover, serum COMP levels were significantly reduced, confirming decreased cartilage involvement. In addition, both histological and radiological analysis showed that bone destruction was prevented (Fig. 1). Systemic IL-4 administration increased serum IL-1Ra levels and reduced anticollagen type II antibody levels. Treatment with low-dose IL-4 (0.1 microgram/day) was ineffective in suppressing disease score, serum COMP or joint destruction. Synergistic suppression of both arthritis severity and COMP levels was noted when low-dose IL-4 was combined with prednisolone (0.05 mg/kg/day), however, which in itself was not effective. DISCUSSION: In the present study, we demonstrate that systemic IL-4 treatment ameliorates disease progression of established CIA. Although clinical disease progression of established CIA. Although clinical disease progression was only arrested and not reversed, clear protection against cartilage and bone destruction was noted. This is in accord with findings in both human RA and animal models of RA that show that inflammation and tissue destruction sometimes are uncoupled processes. Of great importance is that, although inflammation was still present, strong reduction in serum COMP was found after exposure to IL-4. This indicated that serum COMP levels reflected cartilage damage, although a limited contribution of the inflamed synovium cannot be excluded. Increased serum IL-1Ra level (twofold) was found after systemic treatment with IL-4, but it is not likely that this could explain the suppression of CIA. We and others have reported that high dosages of IL-1Ra are needed for marked suppression of CIA. As reported previously, lower dosages of IL-4 did not reduce clinical disease severity of established CIA. Of importance is that combined treatment of low dosages of IL-4 and IL-10 appeared to have more potent anti-inflammatory effects, and markedly protected against cartilage destruction. Improved anti-inflammatory effect was achieved with IL-4/prednisolone treatment. In addition, synergistic effects were found for the reduction of cartilage and bone destruction. This indicates that systemic IL-4/prednisolone treatment may provide a cartilage and bone protective therapy for human RA.
INTRODUCTION:Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with an increased production of a range of cytokines including tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and interleukin (IL)-1, which display potent proinflammatory actions that are thought to contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease. Although TNF-alpha seems to be the major cytokine in the inflammatory process, IL-1 is the key mediator with regard to cartilage and bone destruction. Apart from direct blockage of IL-1/TNF, regulation can be exerted at the level of modulatory cytokines such as IL-1 and IL-10. IL-4 is a pleiotropic T-cell derived cytokine that can exert either suppressive or stimulatory effects on different cell types, and was originally identified as a B-cell growth factor and regulator of humoral immune pathways. IL-4 is produced by activated CD4+T cells and it promotes the maturation of TH2 cells. IL-4 stimulates proliferation, differentiation and activation of several cell types, including fibroblasts, endothelial cells and epithelial cells. IL-4 is also known to be a potent anti-inflammatory cytokine that acts by inhibiting the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-12 by macrophages and monocytes. Moreover, IL-4 stimulates the synthesis of several cytokine inhibitors such as interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), soluble IL-1-receptor type II and TNF receptors IL-4 suppresses metalloproteinase production and stimulates tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 production in human mononuclear phagocytes and cartilage explants, indicating a protective effect of IL-4 towards extracellular matrix degradation. Furthermore, IL-4 inhibits both osteoclast activity and survival, and thereby blocks bone resorption in vitro. Of great importance is that IL-4 could not be detected in synovial fluid or in tissues. This absence of IL-4 in the joint probably contributes to the disturbance in the Th1/Th2 balance in chronic RA. Collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) is a widely used model of arthritis that displays several features of humanRA. Recently it was demonstrated that the onset of CIA is under stringent control of IL-4 and IL-10. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that exposure to IL-4 during the immunization stage reduced onset and severity of CIA. However, after cessation of IL-4 treatment disease expression increased to control values. AIMS: Because it was reported that IL-4 suppresses several proinflammatory cytokines and matrix degrading enzymes and upregulates inhibitors of both cytokines and catabolic enzymes, we investigated the tissue protective effect of systemic IL-4 treatment using established murine CIA as a model. Potential synergy of low dosages of anti-inflammatory glucocorticosteroids and IL-4 was also evaluated. METHODS: DBA-1J/Bom mice were immunized with bovine type II collagen and boosted at day 21. Mice with established CIA were selected at day 28 after immunization and treated for days with IL-4, prednisolone, or combinations of prednisolone and IL-4. Arthritis score was monitored visually. Joint pathology was evaluated by histology, radiology and serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP). In addition, serum levels of IL-1Ra and anticollagen antibodies were determined. RESULTS: Treatment of established CIA with IL-4 (1microgram/day) resulted in suppression of disease activity as depicted in Figure 1. Of great interest is that, although 1 microgram/day IL-4 had only a moderate effect on the inflammatory component of the disease activity, it strongly reduced cartilage pathology, as determined by histological examination (Fig. 1). Moreover, serum COMP levels were significantly reduced, confirming decreased cartilage involvement. In addition, both histological and radiological analysis showed that bone destruction was prevented (Fig. 1). Systemic IL-4 administration increased serum IL-1Ra levels and reduced anticollagen type II antibody levels. Treatment with low-dose IL-4 (0.1 microgram/day) was ineffective in suppressing disease score, serum COMP or joint destruction. Synergistic suppression of both arthritis severity and COMP levels was noted when low-dose IL-4 was combined with prednisolone (0.05 mg/kg/day), however, which in itself was not effective. DISCUSSION: In the present study, we demonstrate that systemic IL-4 treatment ameliorates disease progression of established CIA. Although clinical disease progression of established CIA. Although clinical disease progression was only arrested and not reversed, clear protection against cartilage and bone destruction was noted. This is in accord with findings in both humanRA and animal models of RA that show that inflammation and tissue destruction sometimes are uncoupled processes. Of great importance is that, although inflammation was still present, strong reduction in serum COMP was found after exposure to IL-4. This indicated that serum COMP levels reflected cartilage damage, although a limited contribution of the inflamed synovium cannot be excluded. Increased serum IL-1Ra level (twofold) was found after systemic treatment with IL-4, but it is not likely that this could explain the suppression of CIA. We and others have reported that high dosages of IL-1Ra are needed for marked suppression of CIA. As reported previously, lower dosages of IL-4 did not reduce clinical disease severity of established CIA. Of importance is that combined treatment of low dosages of IL-4 and IL-10 appeared to have more potent anti-inflammatory effects, and markedly protected against cartilage destruction. Improved anti-inflammatory effect was achieved with IL-4/prednisolone treatment. In addition, synergistic effects were found for the reduction of cartilage and bone destruction. This indicates that systemic IL-4/prednisolone treatment may provide a cartilage and bone protective therapy for humanRA.
Interleukin (IL)-4 is a pleiotropic T-cell-derived cytokine that can
exert either suppressive or stimulatory effects on different cell types. It was
originally identified as a B-cell growth factor and regulator of humoral immune
pathways [1,2]. IL-4 is produced by
activated CD4+ T cells and it promotes the maturation of Th2 cells.
IL-4 inhibits the differentiation of naïve T cells to Th1 and cytokine
(ie IL-2 and interferon-γ) production by Th1 cells [3]. IL-4 stimulates proliferation, differentiation or
activation of several cell types, including fibroblasts, endothelium cells and
epithelium cells [4]. IL-4 is also known to be a potent
anti-inflammatory cytokine that acts by inhibiting the synthesis of
proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α,
IL-6, IL-8 and IL-12 by macrophages and monocytes [5,6,7]. Moreover,
IL-4 stimulates the synthesis of several cytokine inhibitors such as
interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), IL-1-receptor type II and TNF
receptors [8,9,10]. IL-4 suppresses metalloproteinase production and
stimulates tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 production in human
mononuclear phagocytes and cartilage explants, indicating a protective effect
of IL-4 towards extracellular matrix degradation [11,12]. Furthermore, IL-4 inhibits both
osteoclast activity and survival, and thereby blocks bone resorption in
vitro [13,14].RA is associated with an increased production of a range of cytokines
including TNFα and IL-1, which display potent proinflammatory actions that
are thought to contribute to the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA)
[15,16]. Although TNF-α
seems to be the major cytokine involved in the inflammatory process, IL-1 is
the key mediator with regard to cartilage and bone destruction [17,18]. Apart from direct blockade of
IL-1/TNF, regulation can be exerted at the level of modulatory cytokines such
as IL-4 and IL-10. Of great importance is that IL-4 could not be detected in
synovial fluid and tissues [19,20], and this lack of IL-4 is likely to contribute to the
uneven Th1/Th2 balance in chronic RA.Although having a number of side effects, including osteoporosis and
reduced adrenal function, glucocorticoids are potent and commonly used
anti-inflammatory agents in humanRA. Glucocorticoids downregulate
proinflammatory cytokine production, such as IL-1 and TNF-α, by
macrophages and monocytes via several mechanisms. One mechanism is through
enhanced IκBα protein synthesis. IκBα forms inactive
cytoplasmic complexes with nuclear factor-κB, which itself activates many
immunoregulatory genes in response to proinflammatory cytokines [21,22]. Other mechanisms of action that
have been reported recently [23] are downmodulation of
histone acetyltransferase and upregulation of histone deacetyltransferase,
which both affected messenger RNA transcription negatively.Murine collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) is a widely used experimental
model of arthritis. Neutralization of the monokines IL-1 and TNF-α before
or during onset of arthritis arrested the development of CIA [24,25]. Expression of CIA is also under
particularly stringent control by IL-4 and IL-10. Treatment with
anti-IL-4/anti-IL-10 shortly before onset accelerated the disease expression
[26]. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that IL-12 plays
a crucial role in the development of CIA, because blockade of endogenous IL-12
completely prevented onset of the disease [27]. In
accord with these findings, during onset of CIA predominantly Th1 responses
towards collagen type II were found [28,29]. It has been claimed [30,31] that IL-4 exposure could induce immune deviation by
enhanced development of Th2-like primary CD4 effector cells. Several animal
studies indicated that IL-4 administration, starting just after immunization
with the disease-inducing agent, ameliorated Th1-mediated models of autoimmune
diseases such as diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice and experimental arthritis
[32,33,34].In the present study the effects of systemic high dose IL-4 therapy in
established CIA were investigated. Furthermore, the potential synergy of
combined prednisolone and IL-4 treatment were examined. We investigated the
protective effect of IL-4 alone or in combination with prednisolone on disease
activity as well as cartilage and bone destruction as determined
histologically, radiologically and by serum measurements of cartilage
oligomeric matrix protein (COMP). Anticollagen type II specific antibodies and
serum IL-1Ra levels were assessed, in order to obtain an insight into the
mechanism of action. The findings suggest that IL-4 treatment protects against
cartilage and bone destruction, and that combined IL-4/steroid treatment may
provide a safe, anti-inflammatory and anti-destructive therapy in humanRA.
Materials and methods
Animals
Male DBA-1/Bom mice were purchased from Bomholdgård (Ry,
Denmark). The mice were housed in filter top cages, and were given free access
to water and food. The mice were immunized at the age of 10–12 weeks.
Materials
Complete Freund's adjuvant and Mycobacterium
tuberculosis (strain H37Ra) were obtained from Difco Laboratories
(Detroit, MI, USA). Bovine serum albumin and prednisolone 21-sodium succinate
(P-4153) were purchased from Sigma Chemicals (St Louis, MO, USA). Antimurine
IL-1Ra antibodies (capture MAP-480, detection BAF-480) were obtained from
R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). PolyHRP-streptavidine (M2032) and
Caseine colloid buffer (M2052) was from CLB (Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
Recombinant murineIL-1Ra was purchased from R&D systems. Recombinant
murineIL-4 (6.5 × 107 U/mg) was kindly provided by Dr S Smith
(Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ, USA).
Collagen preparation
Articular cartilage was obtained from metacarpophalangeal joints of
1–2 year old cows. Bovine type II collagen was prepared according to the method
of Miller and Rhodes [35]. It was dissolved in 0.05 mol/l
acetic acid (5 mg/ml) and stored at -70ºC.
Immunization
Bovine type II collagen was diluted with 0.05 mol/l acetic acid to a
concentration of 2 mg/ml and was emulsified in an equal volume of complete
Freund's adjuvant (2 mg/ml MT H37Ra). The mice were immunized
intradermally at the base of the tail with 100 μl emulsion (100 μg
collagen). At day 21 the animals were boosted with an intra-peritoneal
injection of 100 μg collagen type II, diluted in phosphate-buffered saline
(pH 7.4).
Assessment of arthritis
Mice were examined for visual appearance of arthritis in peripheral
joints, and scores for severity were given (arthritis score) as previously
described [17,18,25,26,27]. Mice
were considered arthritic when significant changes in redness and/or swelling
were noted in digits or in other parts of the paws. At later time points
ankylosis was also included in the arthritis score. Clinical severity of
arthritis was graded on a scale of 0–2 for each paw, according to changes in
redness and swelling: 0, no changes; 0.5, significant; 1.0, moderate; 1.5,
marked; and 2.0, maximal swelling and redness, and later on ankylosis.
Arthritis score (mean± stan-dard deviation) was expressed as cumulative
value for all paws, with a maximum of eight and expressed as percentage of the
initial score at the beginning of treatment.
Treatment of collagen-induced arthritis with interleukin-4,
prednisolone or interleukin-4/prednisolone
To evaluate the effect of IL-4, prednisolone or the combination
IL-4/prednisolone on established CIA, mice with CIA were selected at day 28 and
divided into groups of at least 10 mice with similar arthritis scores.
Thereafter, mice were treated twice a day intraperitoneally with IL-4 (0.1 or 1μg/day), prednisolone (0.05 mg/kg/day), or with IL-4 and prednisolone (at
the same doses for the noncombined regimens) for each of several days as
indicated in the results.
Determination of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist levels
IL-1Ra was measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Briefly, Nunc Maxisorb ELISA plates (Nunc, Rostilde, Denmark) were coated with
capture antibodies (5 μg/ml, carbonate buffer, pH 9.6, 24 h at 4°C),
and thereafter nonspecific binding sites were blocked with 1% bovine serum
albumin/phosphate-buffered saline-Tween. Standards and unknown samples were
diluted in normal DBA-1 serum and incubated for 3 h at room temperature.
Biotinylated detection antibodies were added at concentrations of 0.2–0.4 μg/ml in 0.5% bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered slaine-Tween for 1.5 h
at room temperature. Thereafter plates were incubated with PolyHRP (0.1 μg/ml in 1% caseine colloid buffer) for 45 min and orthophenylenediamine
(0.8 mg/ml) was used as substrate. Plates were read at 495 nm.
Measurement of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein
At the end of the experiments, serum samples were taken and murinecartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) levels were determinated using ELISA
under similar conditions as those described for the assay for humanCOMP [36]. The assay was modified by using rat COMP for coating the
microtitre plates, the standard curve included in each plate and by using the
polyclonal antiserum raised against rat COMP to detect the antibody [37,38]. A high cross-reactivity was
found to murineCOMP [39]. This was shown by parallel
dilution curves of murine sera to the standard curve prepared with rat COMP, as
well as in experiments in which a dilution of murine serum was added to the
standard curve.
Determination of anticollagen antibodies
Antibodies against bovine type II collagen were examined by using an
ELISA. Titres of total IgG, IgG1 and IgG2a were measured.
Briefly, plates were coated with 10 μg bovine type II, and thereafter
nonspecific bindings sites were blocked with 0.1 mol/l ethanolamin (Sigma
Chemicals). Serial 1 : 2 dilutions of the sera were added, followed by incubation
with isotype-specific goat antimouse peroxidase (Southern Biotechnology
Associates, Birmingham, AL, USA) and substrate (5-aminosalicyclic acid; Sigma
Chemicals). Plates were read at 492 nm. Titres were expressed as means ±
standard deviation dilution, which gives the half maximal value.
Radiological analysis of bone destruction
At the end of the experiments, knee joints were removed and used for
radiological analysis as a measure of bone destruction. Radiographs were
carefully examined using a stereo microscope, and joint destruction was graded
on a scale from 0 to 5, ranging from no damage, minor bone destruction observed
as one enlightened spot, moderate changes, two to four spots observed in one
area, marked changes, two to four spots observed in more areas, severe erosions
afflicting the joint, complete destruction of joint and/or new bone formations.
Bone destruction was scored on the femoral head, tibia and patella as described
previously [17].
Histology
Mice were killed by ether anaesthesia. Knee joints were removed and
fixed for 4 days in 4% formaldehyde. After decalcification in 5% formic acid,
the specimens were processed for paraffin embedding [17,18,25,26,27]. Tissue sections (7 μm
thick) were stained with haematoxylin and eosin, or safranin O.
Histopathological changes were scored using the following parameters.Infiltration of cells was scored on a scale from 0 to 3, depending
on the amount of inflammatory cells in the synovial tissues. Inflammatory cells
in the joint cavity were graded on a scale from 0 to 3 and expressed as
exudate. Cartilage proteoglycan depletion was determined using safranin O
staining. The loss of proteoglycans was scored on a scale from 0 to 3, ranging
from fully stained cartilage to destained cartilage or complete loss of
articular cartilage. A characteristic parameter in CIA is the progressive loss
of articular cartilage. This destruction was separately graded on a scale from
0 to 3, ranging from the appearance of dead chondrocytes (empty lacunae) to
complete loss of the articular cartilage. Bone erosion was scored on a scale
ranging from 0 to 3, ranging from no abnormalities to complete loss of cortical
and trabecular bone of the femoral head and patella. Histopathological changes
in the knee joints were scored in the patella/femur region on 5 semiserial
sections of the joint, spaced 70 μm apart. Scoring was performed on
decoded slides by two observers, as described earlier [17,18,25,26,27].
Statistical analysis
Differences between experimental groups were tested using the
Mann-Whitney U test, unless otherwise stated.
Results
Amelioration of arthritis score in collagen-induced arthritis by
in vivo treatment of interleukin-4
To investigate effects of in vivo treatment of established
CIA with IL-4, mice that expressed CIA at day 28 after immunization were
injected intraperitoneally with vehicle, 0.1 or 1 μg IL-4 per day. Figure
2 shows that administration of 1 μg/day IL-4
results in significant amelioration of the arthritis score, but a lower dosage
of 0.1 μg/day IL-4 was without effect. The anti-inflammatory effect of 1
μg/day IL-4 was further illustrated in Figure 3, in
which disease progression is expressed as change in (Δ) disease activity
of all individual mice. Increased severity of CIA score can be seen in animals
treated either with vehicle or 0.1 μg/day IL-4, whereas significantly
decreased disease activity was noted after treatment with 1 μg/day IL-4.
Histology revealed that no effect was found on the influx of inflammatory cells
in joint tissues of IL-4-treated animals when compared with the vehicle-treated
animals (Table 1).
Figure 2
Dose dependent suppression of disease activity of collagen-induced
arthritis (CIA) by interleukin (IL)-4 and the combination of IL-4/prednisolone
(Pred). Mice with established CIA were divided into separate groups of at least
10 mice. Groups were treated intraperitoneally twice a day with vehicle, IL-4,
prednisolone, or combined IL-4/prednisolone for 8 consecutive days. The data
represent the mean arthritis score, expressed as percentage of initial value at
day 28. Experiments were repeated once with approximately the same outcome.
*P < 0.05, versus vehicle, by Mann-Whitney U test.
Figure 3
Dose-dependent arrest of disease activity by treatment with
interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-4/prednisolone (Pred). The enhanced disease activity
between days 28 and 35 of each individual mouse is expressed as change in
(Δ) disease activity. For treatment protocol, see Fig. 2. P < 0.05, versus vehicle, by Mann-Whitney U
test.
Table 1
Effect of prednisolone, interleukin (IL)-4 or IL-4/prednisolone
treatment on the joint pathology of collagen-induced arthritis in Mice
Cartilage
Proteoglycan
Bone
Treatment
Dose
Infiltrate
destruction
loss
erosin
n
Vehicle
-
2.3 ± 0.9
2.2 ± 0.9
2.7 ± 1.0
1.9 ± 0.9
20
Prednisolone
0.05
2.1 ± 0.8
2.1 ± 1.2
2.6 ± 0.6
1.7 ± 1.1
20
IL-4
0.1
2.5 ± 0.7
2.5 ± 0.8
2.9 ± 0.3
2.0 ± 0.8
10
IL-4
1
2.0 ± 1.0
1.2 ± 0.8*
2.0 ± 0.7
0.6 ± 0.6*
20
IL-4/prednisolone
0.1/0.05
2.1 ± 0.4
1.6 ± 0.7
2.5 ± 0.8
2.1 ± 0.6
10
IL-4/prednisolone
1/0.05
1.2 ± 0.5*
1.1 ± 0.9*
1.4 ± 0.7*
0.4 ± 0.5*
10
Histopathology scores of arthritic knee joints after treatment
with vehicle, IL-4, prednisolone or the combination of IL-4/prednisolone. Mice
were sacrified and knee joints were used for histology. Histology was scored as
indicated in the Materials and methods section. Mice were treated twice a day
intraperitoneally with either prednisolone (0.05 mg/kg), or IL-4 (0.1 or 1
μg/day], or IL-4 (at both dosages) combined with prednisolone
(0.05 mg/kg). *P <0.05, versus vehicle, by Mann-Whitney U
test.
Interleukin-4 protects against cartilage destruction
Systemic treatment with high-dose IL-4 (1μg/day) significantly
decreased cartilage destruction, determined as chondrocyte death and cartilage
erosions (Fig. 4,Table 1). It did
not result in a significantly reduced loss of matrix proteoglycans, as
determined by safranin O staining (Fig. 5, Table
1). It has been demonstrated (data not shown) that there
is a strong correlation between severe cartilage damage and increased serum
COMP levels during murine CIA. In naïve DBA-1 mice, serum COMP levels are
approximately 4.0 μg/ml and COMP levels increased up to 8–12 μg/ml in
mice with fully established CIA. Serum COMP levels were determined in the
various groups to identify the protection against severe cartilage destruction
by IL-4. Figure 6 shows that elevated COMP in CIA were
not reduced by treatment with low-dose IL-4. It is of particular interest, that
treatment with high-dose IL-4 (1 μg/day) significantly reduced serum COMP
levels to values found in nonarthritic control animals.
Figure 4
Interleukin (IL)-4 treatment reduced cartilage destruction,
whereas IL-4/prednisolone treatment additionally decreased cell influx.
(a) Knee joint from vehicle-treated mouse. Severe cartilage destruction
can be seen. Empty lacunae reflects chondrocyte death as marker of cartilage
destruction, indicated by arrows. (b) Knee joint of a mouse treated with
IL-4 1 μg/kg/day for eight consecutive days. Note the reduced cartilage
destruction and chondrocyte death. (c) Knee joint of vehicle-treated
animal. Note the severe cell influx in synovial tissues and joint cavity.
(d) Knee joint of a mouse treated with IL-4/prednisolone (1 μg per
day/0.05 mg per kg). Note the marked reduction of cell influx. All specimens
were sampled at day 35. P, patella; F, femur; JS, joint space; C, cartilage; S,
synovium. Haematoxylin and eosin staining was used. Original magnifications:
× 200 (a, b) and × 100 (c, d).
Figure 5
Effect of IL-4 or IL-4/prednisolone treatment on matrix
proteoglycan loss. (a) Knee joint of a control naïve mouse. The
fully stained cartilage layers indicate no loss of proteoglycans. (b)
Knee joint of an arthritic mouse treated with vehicle. Note the severe joint
inflammation and complete loss of safranin O staining of the cartilage layers
(indicated by arrows). (c) Mouse treated with IL-4 (1 μg/day).
Loss of matrix proteoglycan can still be seen. (d) Knee joint of a mouse
treated with IL-4/prednisolone (1 μg per day/0.05 mg per kg). Marked
reduction in matrix proteoglycan depletion after combined treatment. For
details see Fig. 4. Safranin O staining, original
magnification × 100.
Figure 6
Serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) level as a marker
of cartilage turnover. Suppression of serum COMP was found after treatment with
interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-4/prednisolone (Pred). IL-4(1 μg/day) and both
doses (0.1 μg per day/0.05 mg per kg per day; and 1 μg per
day/0.05 mg per kg per day) of IL-4/prednisolone reduced serum COMP levels to
basic levels as found in nonimmunized animals (4.2 ± 0.2 μg/ml). The
data represent the mean± standard deviation COMP level of at least six
sera per group. *P < 0.01, versus vehicle, by
Mann-Whitney U test.
Interleukin-4 protects against bone destruction
Bone destruction, which is a common feature of murine collagen
arthritis, was examined by radiological analysis. Radiographs of knee joints
were taken at the end of the treatment period. Figure 7
showed that treatment with 1 μg/day IL-4 was sufficient to prevent bone
destruction, determined as bone erosions on the head of the femur, the patella
and the tibia. Little or no effect was noted after treatment with low-dose
IL-4. Histological analysis of knee joints corroborated the protective effect
of IL-4 (Table 1). Figure 8 (a, c)
depicts degradation of patellar and femural cortical bone by osteoclasts in the
vehicle-treated group, whereas almost no osteoclasts were seen in the
IL-4-treated group (Fig. 8d).
Figure 7
Protection of interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-4/prednisolone (Pred)
treatment on bone destruction. Knee joints were isolated at day 35 and bone
destruction was examined by radiographic analysis. For treatment scheme see
Fig. 2. Erosions were scored on a scale ranging from 0 to
5 on the femur head, tibia and patella. Each group consists of at least nine
knee joints per group. *P < 0.01, versus vehicle, by
Mann-Whitney U test.
Figure 8
Bone destruction is prevented by interleukin (IL)-4 and
IL-4/prednisolone treatment. (a) Severe bone destruction in patella and
femur in knee joint of vehicle-treated animal. (b) Almost no bone
degradation was noted after treatment with IL-4/prednisolone (1 μg per
day/0.05 mg per kg). (c) Bone destruction in femur of a vehicle-treated
animal at higher magnification. Osteoclasts, large multinuclear cells, located
at the site of bone destruction (arrows). (d) No osteoclast-like cells
were found in IL-4 (1 μg/day) treated animals. For treatment details see
Fig. 4. S, synovium; B, bone; BM, bone marrow. Original
magnifications × 200 (a, b), × 400 (c, d).
Combined interleukin-4/prednisolone treatment
We examined potential synergistic effects of IL-4 and prednisolone,
using low-dose prednisolone (0.05 mg/kg/day) and 0.1 or 1μg/day IL-4.
Treatment of CIA with IL-4/prednisolone completely arrested the development of
inflammatory signs of CIA (Figs 2 and 3). Both combinations tested revealed full suppression of
disease progression. In accord with previous observations, mice treated with
0.05 mg/kg/day prednisolone alone did not show significant suppression of
arthritis. Histology taken after 7 days of treatment showed enhanced safranin O
staining only in animals treated with IL-4/prednisolone (1 μg per
kg/0.05 kg daily), indicating reduced depletion of matrix proteoglycans (Table
1, Fig. 5d). This was in accord
with the marked reduction in joint inflammation, as can be seen in Figure
4d. Both combinations of IL-4 and prednisolone reduced
serum COMP to values found in naïve DBA-1 mice. Interestingly, synergistic
suppression of serum COMP was noted after exposure to low-dose IL-4 and
prednisolone (Fig. 6). In contrast to serum COMP levels,
combined IL-4/prednisolone treatment did not result in synergistic protection
against bone destruction. High-dose IL-4 alone was already highly effective,
and the combination of IL-4 with prednisolone did not improve the effect
further, or was there an adverse effect of prednisolone (Table 1, Figs 7 and 8b).
Treatment of CIA with 1 μg/day IL-4 alone and in combination with
prednisolone (0.05 mg/kg/day) for 7 days caused similar reduction in osteoclast
numbers (data not shown).
Effect of interleukin-4, or interleukin-4/prednisolone treatment
on interleukin-1 receptor antagonist and anticollagen antibody levels
Serum IL-1Ra levels were determined at the end of the experiments
and Table 2 shows a twofold increase after IL-4 treatment
(1μg/day dose). Treatment with 0.1μg/day IL-4 showed no significant
effects on serum IL-1Ra levels. Prednisolone reduced IL-1Ra levels when
compared with vehicle-treated animals. In accord with these findings, combined
IL-4/prednisolone (1 μg per day/ 0.05 mg per kg per day) treatment resulted
in lower IL-1Ra levels than found with IL-4 alone.
Table 2
Serum interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra levels) after
treatment with either interleukin (IL)-4, prednisolone, or
IL-4/prednisolone
Treatment
Dose
IL-1Ra (pg/ml)
Vehicle
-
414 ± 155
IL-4
0.1
386 ± 213
IL-4
1
838 ± 187*
Prednisolone
0.05
326 ± 165
IL-4/prednisolone
0.1/0.05
422 ± 129
1/0.05
499 ± 187
Serum IL-1Ra was determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay at day 35 after immunization. Mice were treated as indicated in Table
1. The data represent the mean± standard deviation
of at least eight mice per group. The sensitivity of the IL-1Ra assay was to
within 160 pg/ml. *P < 0.05, versus vehicle, by
Mann-Whitney U test.
Anticollagen antibodies were assayed at the end of treatment period
at day 35. The antibody levels increased rapidly after clinical expression of
CIA around day 28 after immunization. After IL-4 (1μg/day) treatment for
7 days, total IgGs levels as well as IgG1 and IgG2a
anticollagen type II antibody levels were lower compared with vehicle treated
animals (Fig. 9). Although all anticollagen type II
antibodies were reduced, IgG2a levels showed the most prominent
reduction, indicating an effect on the Th1 rather than on the Th2 immune
response. No decreased anticollagen type II antibody levels were found after
treatment with low-dose IL-4. The high-dose IL-4/prednisolone regimen reduced
anticollagen type II antibodies to levels similar to those found after
treatment with 1μg/day IL-4.
Figure 9
Interleukin (IL)-4 or IL-4/prednisolone (Pred) treatment is
associated with reduced anticollagen type II (CII) antibody levels. Treatment
with 1 μg/day IL-4 resulted in lower anticollagen type II antibodies.
Total Immunoglobulins (Ig tot), IgG1 and IgG2a levels
were reduced. Similar effects were found after treatment with IL-4/prednisolone
(1 μg per day/0.05 mg per kg). Anticollagen type II levels were determined
in at least six mice per group. Data are expressed as means ± standard
deviation dilution, which gives the half maximal value.
Dose dependent suppression of disease activity of collagen-induced
arthritis (CIA) by interleukin (IL)-4 and the combination of IL-4/prednisolone
(Pred). Mice with established CIA were divided into separate groups of at least
10 mice. Groups were treated intraperitoneally twice a day with vehicle, IL-4,
prednisolone, or combined IL-4/prednisolone for 8 consecutive days. The data
represent the mean arthritis score, expressed as percentage of initial value at
day 28. Experiments were repeated once with approximately the same outcome.
*P < 0.05, versus vehicle, by Mann-Whitney U test.Dose-dependent arrest of disease activity by treatment with
interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-4/prednisolone (Pred). The enhanced disease activity
between days 28 and 35 of each individual mouse is expressed as change in
(Δ) disease activity. For treatment protocol, see Fig. 2. P < 0.05, versus vehicle, by Mann-Whitney U
test.Interleukin (IL)-4 treatment reduced cartilage destruction,
whereas IL-4/prednisolone treatment additionally decreased cell influx.
(a) Knee joint from vehicle-treated mouse. Severe cartilage destruction
can be seen. Empty lacunae reflects chondrocyte death as marker of cartilage
destruction, indicated by arrows. (b) Knee joint of a mouse treated with
IL-4 1 μg/kg/day for eight consecutive days. Note the reduced cartilage
destruction and chondrocyte death. (c) Knee joint of vehicle-treated
animal. Note the severe cell influx in synovial tissues and joint cavity.
(d) Knee joint of a mouse treated with IL-4/prednisolone (1 μg per
day/0.05 mg per kg). Note the marked reduction of cell influx. All specimens
were sampled at day 35. P, patella; F, femur; JS, joint space; C, cartilage; S,
synovium. Haematoxylin and eosin staining was used. Original magnifications:
× 200 (a, b) and × 100 (c, d).Effect of IL-4 or IL-4/prednisolone treatment on matrix
proteoglycan loss. (a) Knee joint of a control naïve mouse. The
fully stained cartilage layers indicate no loss of proteoglycans. (b)
Knee joint of an arthritic mouse treated with vehicle. Note the severe joint
inflammation and complete loss of safranin O staining of the cartilage layers
(indicated by arrows). (c) Mouse treated with IL-4 (1 μg/day).
Loss of matrix proteoglycan can still be seen. (d) Knee joint of a mouse
treated with IL-4/prednisolone (1 μg per day/0.05 mg per kg). Marked
reduction in matrix proteoglycan depletion after combined treatment. For
details see Fig. 4. Safranin O staining, original
magnification × 100.Serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) level as a marker
of cartilage turnover. Suppression of serum COMP was found after treatment with
interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-4/prednisolone (Pred). IL-4(1 μg/day) and both
doses (0.1 μg per day/0.05 mg per kg per day; and 1 μg per
day/0.05 mg per kg per day) of IL-4/prednisolone reduced serum COMP levels to
basic levels as found in nonimmunized animals (4.2 ± 0.2 μg/ml). The
data represent the mean± standard deviation COMP level of at least six
sera per group. *P < 0.01, versus vehicle, by
Mann-Whitney U test.Protection of interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-4/prednisolone (Pred)
treatment on bone destruction. Knee joints were isolated at day 35 and bone
destruction was examined by radiographic analysis. For treatment scheme see
Fig. 2. Erosions were scored on a scale ranging from 0 to
5 on the femur head, tibia and patella. Each group consists of at least nine
knee joints per group. *P < 0.01, versus vehicle, by
Mann-Whitney U test.Bone destruction is prevented by interleukin (IL)-4 and
IL-4/prednisolone treatment. (a) Severe bone destruction in patella and
femur in knee joint of vehicle-treated animal. (b) Almost no bone
degradation was noted after treatment with IL-4/prednisolone (1 μg per
day/0.05 mg per kg). (c) Bone destruction in femur of a vehicle-treated
animal at higher magnification. Osteoclasts, large multinuclear cells, located
at the site of bone destruction (arrows). (d) No osteoclast-like cells
were found in IL-4 (1 μg/day) treated animals. For treatment details see
Fig. 4. S, synovium; B, bone; BM, bone marrow. Original
magnifications × 200 (a, b), × 400 (c, d).Interleukin (IL)-4 or IL-4/prednisolone (Pred) treatment is
associated with reduced anticollagen type II (CII) antibody levels. Treatment
with 1 μg/day IL-4 resulted in lower anticollagen type II antibodies.
Total Immunoglobulins (Ig tot), IgG1 and IgG2a levels
were reduced. Similar effects were found after treatment with IL-4/prednisolone
(1 μg per day/0.05 mg per kg). Anticollagen type II levels were determined
in at least six mice per group. Data are expressed as means ± standard
deviation dilution, which gives the half maximal value.Effect of prednisolone, interleukin (IL)-4 or IL-4/prednisolone
treatment on the joint pathology of collagen-induced arthritis in MiceHistopathology scores of arthritic knee joints after treatment
with vehicle, IL-4, prednisolone or the combination of IL-4/prednisolone. Mice
were sacrified and knee joints were used for histology. Histology was scored as
indicated in the Materials and methods section. Mice were treated twice a day
intraperitoneally with either prednisolone (0.05 mg/kg), or IL-4 (0.1 or 1
μg/day], or IL-4 (at both dosages) combined with prednisolone
(0.05 mg/kg). *P <0.05, versus vehicle, by Mann-Whitney U
test.Serum interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra levels) after
treatment with either interleukin (IL)-4, prednisolone, or
IL-4/prednisoloneSerum IL-1Ra was determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay at day 35 after immunization. Mice were treated as indicated in Table
1. The data represent the mean± standard deviation
of at least eight mice per group. The sensitivity of the IL-1Ra assay was to
within 160 pg/ml. *P < 0.05, versus vehicle, by
Mann-Whitney U test.
Discussion
The present study demonstrates clear tissue-protective effects of
IL-4, although IL-4 did not prove to be a very potent anti-inflammatory
cytokine. Both cartilage and bone erosion were prevented by IL-4 treatment of
established CIA. Combination with low-dose prednisolone enhanced the
anti-inflammatory capacity of IL-4. This might offer an attractive alternative
to the use of high-dose prednisolone, because it can circumvent the unwanted
side effects of the drug, including steroid-induced osteoporosis.In previous studies of murine collagen arthritis [17,18,25] it was
shown that TNF-α is important at onset of the disease, whereas IL-1 is the
dominant cytokine, not only at the onset, but also in the progression of the
arthritis and the concomitant cartilage destruction. Further support for the
critical role of IL-1 is provided by the absence of collagen arthritis in
IL-1β-deficient mice, and the marked reduction of this arthritis in
ICE-deficient mice as well as in normal mice treated with IL-1β-converting enzyme inhibitors [40,41]. Moreover, reduced onset of arthritis was noted in
TNF-receptor-deficient mice, but once a joint was afflicted the arthritis
progressed to full-blown expression and cartilage destruction, again
emphasizing that TNF is important in onset, but is not the dominant cytokine in
progression and tissue destruction [42].In recent studies, it was clearly demonstrated that onset of CIA is
under stringent control of IL-4 and IL-10, because blockade of both IL-4 and
IL-10 by the use of antibodies accelerated disease onset [26]. Furthermore, treatment of established murine CIA with
low-dose IL-4 showed no suppressive effect on disease activity and joint
pathology. Interestingly, combination of low-dose IL-4 and IL-10 appeared to
have more potent anti-inflammatory effects, and resulted in protection against
cartilage pathology [26]. Systemic treatment of murine
CIA with high-dose IL-4 (3 μg/day) during the immunization stage delays
onset as well as reduces severity. When IL-4 administration was terminated,
however, disease expression and activity rapidly accelerated and was
indistinguishable from that in the vehicle-treated control group [34]. Systemic IL-4 treatment of streptococcal cell wall
arthritis in rats resulted in suppression of disease activity, and ameliorated
the chronic destructive process leading to decreased lesions [33]. This was associated with enhanced levels of IL-1Ra, the
natural inhibitor of IL-1, which is in accord with observations in the present
study and with studies in humans systemically treated with IL-4 [43]. However, it is not likely that the twofold increment in
serum IL-1Ra levels, found after IL-4 exposure, is sufficient to suppress CIA.
As previously mentioned, blockade of IL-1 by anti-IL-1 antibodies or very
high-dose IL-1Ra completely suppressed CIA and lead to full protection against
joint pathology [17,18,25]. Whether IL-4 acts locally or systemically is at present
unknown. Further experiments on biodistribution of IL-4 are needed to resolve
this issue.IL-4 levels are virtually undetectable in arthritic tissue of RA
patients, suggesting that the disease is either a selective Th1 process or is
not driven at all by T cells. An alternative explanation could be the fact that
IL-1α and IL-1β specifically inhibit IL-4 synthesis by T cells [44]. Other proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-6
and IL-12 did not decrease IL-4 production, indicating the pivotal role of IL-1
in RA. It is known that IL-4 has a suppressive effect on Th1 activity and is a
crucial factor in differentiation of naïve T cells into the Th2 phenotype.
This suppression has been suggested to be due to the inhibitory effect of IL-4
on IL-12 generation by antigen-presenting cells and macrophages [7]. IL-12, on the other hand, is a potent stimulator of the
generation of Th1 cells. Analysis of anticollagen type II antibodies revealed
that systemic IL-4 treatment did not alter the balance of
IgG2a/IgG1 antibodies, indicating no suppressive effect
on the Th1 immune response. Total anticollagen type II antibody levels were
lower in both IL-4 (1 μg/day) and IL-4/prednisolone treated animals when
compared with the vehicle group. We have previously found that anticollagen
type II antibody levels rapidly increased after onset of CIA and reached the
highest levels after 7 days (Joosten LAB, unpublished data). IL-4 treatment
arrested the development of high anticollagen type II antibody levels after
onset and did not alter IgG2a/IgG1 balance.Cartilage alterations were screened for by histology as well as COMP
levels in sera of mice at the end of the experiments. COMP is a prominent
component of articular cartilage. In a process affecting cartilage turnover,
fragments are released and eventually reach the circulation. Thus, serum levels
may be used as a marker of generalized cartilage turnover [44,45]. More recent studies [46,47] have demonstrated the production
of COMP by activated synovial cells and synovial tissue of RA and
osteoarthritis patients. Although the relative contribution to serum levels is
not firmly established, important information has been obtained from studies of
collagen arthritis in rats. Thus, increased serum COMP levels are seen at time
points when erosive changes appear in cartilage, whereas in early stages with
marked inflammation in the synovium no increased COMP levels are seen [37,38] (Larsson E, Saxne T, unpublished
data). Furthermore, serum COMP levels are reduced to normal in murine CIA after
treatment with IL-1-blocking antibodies, in correspondence with a marked
suppression of the cartilage lesion as viewed histologically [17]. Thus, evidence so far indicates that changes in serum
COMP relate to changes in the cartilage turnover. In accord with these
findings, low-dose IL-4/prednisolone treatment did not suppress disease
activity, largely reflecting synovitis, but clearly reduced serum COMP levels.
Histology interestingly revealed that serum COMP levels correlated more with
cartilage erosions than with loss of matrix proteoglycans, which is a
reversible process.Recently, it was shown that expression of neo-epitope VDIPEN
correlated with marked cartilage erosions during experimental arthritis. This
neoepitope is formed by proteolytic cleavage of aggrecan by matrix
metalloproteinases (MMPs). VDIPEN expression reflects MMP-3 (eg stromelysin)
activity and it colocalized with collagen breakdown epitopes, indicating severe
cartilage damage by MMPs [48,49].
It was demonstrated that IL-4 down-regulates both stromelysin and collagenase
synthesis and thereby contributed to inhibition of cartilage destruction [11,12,50]. Thus,
reduction of cartilage destruction found after IL-4 treatment may well be due
to a lower production of MMPs and/or inhibition of their activity. The fact
that IL-4 treatment did not protect against proteoglycan loss does suggest that
IL-4 has no major suppressive effect on aggrecanase. In a previous study [51] we showed that early proteoglycan loss is mediated by
aggrecanase, whereas erosive, late destruction is linked to stromelysin.Control of bone destruction is a most challenging objective in
treatment of RA. In areas of tumour-like synovial tissue, erosion of
subchondral and cortical bone is common, leading to the characteristic erosions
seen on radiography. Osteoclasts can be seen in the areas of bone destruction
during CIA. It has been reported that IL-4 inhibits bone resorption by
inhibition of osteoclast development and activity in vitro [13,14]. Here, we report for the first
time that systemic IL-4 treatment of established CIA markedly reduced bone
erosions, examined by radiographic analysis and histopathology. Neither bone
destruction nor osteoclasts were noted in arthritic knee joints of animals
treated with high-dose IL-4, indicating decreased formation of these cells.
IL-4 furthermore downregulates IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α and prostaglandin
E2 production in several cell types that play a role in the
resorption process of the bone. Interestingly, blocking studies with
neutralizing antibodies directed against IL-4 in CIA indicated that the
endogenous cytokine inhibited bone destruction. In animals treated with
anti-IL-4, bone destruction determined by radiographic analysis was aggravated
compared with that in vehicle-treated animals (data not shown).Glucocorticoids are potent and commonly accepted anti-inflammatory
agents, but the major drawback on continued usage in arthritis is the severe
negative effect on the bone. More recent studies on the mechanism of action
revealed strong downregulation of macrophage production of the proinflammatory
cytokines TNF-α and IL-1, related to enhanced IκBα synthesis.
Intriguingly, over a large dose range steroids not only inhibit TNF and IL-1,
but also reduce the production of IL-1Ra and regulatory cytokines such as IL-4
and IL-10 [52]. This suggests that the net effect in
joint inflammation is impaired by the lack of the protective cytokines, which
inhibit TNF/IL-1 production as well as induce potent upregulators of scavengers
such as soluble receptors for TNF and IL-1, and IL-1Ra [8,9,53]. Moreover,
IL-4 powerfully reduces inducible nitric oxide synthase expression, thereby
counteracting the suppressive effect of IL-1 on chondrocyte proteoglycan
synthesis, which is mainly nitric oxide mediated. Evidence for the latter was
provided in in vitro studies with nitric oxide inhibitors. In further
support of a role in vivo, we recently demonstrated that IL-1 failed
to inhibit chondrocyte proteoglycan synthesis in inducible nitric oxide
synthase deficient mice [54].The present data clearly demonstrates the synergistic effect of
combination therapy of low-dose prednisolone and IL-4. Low-dose IL-4 was
without suppressive effect on clinical disease activity, which is in accord
with previous studies [39]. However, when combined with
prednisolone the progression of CIA was completely arrested. Furthermore,
synergistic suppression of cartilage destruction was demonstrated by lowered
serum COMP levels, which was also reflected by histology. Only combined therapy
with high-dose IL-4 and prednisolone was able to suppress the influx of
inflammatory cells in joint tissues and reduce the loss of matrix
proteoglycans.In conclusion, IL-4 might offer an alternative cartilage-and
bone-protective therapy that is complementary to TNF/IL-1 inhibitors. Its
limited effect on the inflammatory process warrants combination with other
therapeutic modalities. The present data suggest that combination with
prednisolone at low dosages provides an intriguing option. In accord with
earlier observations of both IL-10/prednisolone and IL-4/IL-10 synergy [26,39], it must be considered that a
cocktail of IL-4, IL-10 and low-dose glucocorticosteroids or glucocorticoids
might be an even more efficacious therapy for humanRA.
Authors: F Colotta; F Re; M Muzio; R Bertini; N Polentarutti; M Sironi; J G Giri; S K Dower; J E Sims; A Mantovani Journal: Science Date: 1993-07-23 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: M J Rapoport; A Jaramillo; D Zipris; A H Lazarus; D V Serreze; E H Leiter; P Cyopick; J S Danska; T L Delovitch Journal: J Exp Med Date: 1993-07-01 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: P Bakakos; C Pickard; W M Wong; K R Ayre; J Madden; A J Frew; E Hodges; M I D Cawley; J L Smith Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Brendan L Roach; Arta Kelmendi-Doko; Elaine C Balutis; Kacey G Marra; Gerard A Ateshian; Clark T Hung Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2016-03-31 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Sujata Sarkar; Laura A Cooney; Peter White; Deborah B Dunlop; Judith Endres; Julie M Jorns; Matthew J Wasco; David A Fox Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2009-10-26 Impact factor: 5.156