Literature DB >> 11055958

Oxygen-dependent growth of the sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio oxyclinae in coculture with Marinobacter sp. Strain MB in an aerated sulfate-depleted chemostat.

P Sigalevich1, Y Cohen.   

Abstract

A chemostat coculture of the sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio oxyclinae and the facultatively aerobic heterotroph Marinobacter sp. strain MB was grown for 1 week under anaerobic conditions at a dilution rate of 0.05 h(-1). It was then exposed to an oxygen flux of 223 micromol min(-1) by gassing the growth vessel with 5% O(2). Sulfate reduction persisted under these conditions, though the amount of sulfate reduced decreased by 45% compared to the amount reduced during the initial anaerobic mode. After 1 week of growth under these conditions, sulfate was excluded from the incoming medium. The sulfate concentration in the growth vessel decreased exponentially from 4.1 mM to 2.5 microM. The coculture consumed oxygen effectively, and no residual oxygen was detected during either growth mode in which oxygen was supplied. The proportion of D. oxyclinae cells in the coculture as determined by in situ hybridization decreased from 86% under anaerobic conditions to 70% in the microaerobic sulfate-reducing mode and 34% in the microaerobic sulfate-depleted mode. As determined by the most-probable-number (MPN) method, the numbers of viable D. oxyclinae cells during the two microaerobic growth modes decreased compared to the numbers during the anaerobic growth mode. However, there was no significant difference between the MPN values for the two modes when oxygen was supplied. The patterns of consumption of electron donors and acceptors suggested that when oxygen was supplied in the absence of sulfate and thiosulfate, D. oxyclinae performed incomplete aerobic oxidation of lactate to acetate. This is the first observation of oxygen-dependent growth of a sulfate-reducing bacterium in the absence of either sulfate or thiosulfate. Cells harvested during the microaerobic sulfate-depleted stage and exposed to sulfate and thiosulfate in a respiration chamber were capable of anaerobic sulfate and thiosulfate reduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11055958      PMCID: PMC92414          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.66.11.5019-5023.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  15 in total

1.  Diversity of sulfate-reducing bacteria in oxic and anoxic regions of a microbial mat characterized by comparative analysis of dissimilatory sulfite reductase genes.

Authors:  D Minz; J L Flax; S J Green; G Muyzer; Y Cohen; M Wagner; B E Rittmann; D A Stahl
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Purification and characterization of an iron superoxide dismutase and a catalase from the sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio gigas.

Authors:  W G Dos Santos; I Pacheco; M Y Liu; M Teixeira; A V Xavier; J LeGall
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Unexpected population distribution in a microbial mat community: sulfate-reducing bacteria localized to the highly oxic chemocline in contrast to a eukaryotic preference for anoxia.

Authors:  D Minz; S Fishbain; S J Green; G Muyzer; Y Cohen; B E Rittmann; D A Stahl
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  A tentative direct microscopic method for counting living marine bacteria.

Authors:  K Kogure; U Simidu; N Taga
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Transition from anaerobic to aerobic growth conditions for the sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio oxyclinae results in flocculation.

Authors:  P Sigalevich; E Meshorer; Y Helman; Y Cohen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Sulfate reduction and possible aerobic metabolism of the sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio oxyclinae in a chemostat coculture with Marinobacter sp. Strain MB under exposure to increasing oxygen concentrations.

Authors:  P Sigalevich; M V Baev; A Teske; Y Cohen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Oxygen-dependent growth of the obligate anaerobe Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough.

Authors:  M S Johnson; I B Zhulin; M E Gapuzan; B L Taylor
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Anaerobic microbes: oxygen detoxification without superoxide dismutase.

Authors:  F E Jenney; M F Verhagen; X Cui; M W Adams
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-08       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Routine high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of carboxylic acids in wines and champagne.

Authors:  D Tusseau; C Benoit
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1987-06-12

10.  Sulfate-reducing bacteria and their activities in cyanobacterial mats of solar lake (Sinai, Egypt).

Authors:  A Teske; N B Ramsing; K Habicht; M Fukui; J Küver; B B Jørgensen; Y Cohen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  10 in total

1.  Aerobic organic carbon mineralization by sulfate-reducing bacteria in the oxygen-saturated photic zone of a hypersaline microbial mat.

Authors:  H M Jonkers; I-O Koh; P Behrend; G Muyzer; D de Beer
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Diversity and distribution of sulfate-reducing bacteria in permanently frozen Lake Fryxell, McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Karr; W Matthew Sattley; Melissa R Rice; Deborah O Jung; Michael T Madigan; Laurie A Achenbach
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Investigations into the differential reactivity of endogenous and exogenous mercury species in coastal sediments.

Authors:  S Bouchet; P Rodriguez-Gonzalez; R Bridou; M Monperrus; E Tessier; P Anschutz; R Guyoneaud; D Amouroux
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Transition from anaerobic to aerobic growth conditions for the sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio oxyclinae results in flocculation.

Authors:  P Sigalevich; E Meshorer; Y Helman; Y Cohen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Rubredoxin:oxygen oxidoreductase enhances survival of Desulfovibrio vulgaris hildenborough under microaerophilic conditions.

Authors:  Janine D Wildschut; R Michael Lang; Johanna K Voordouw; Gerrit Voordouw
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Sulfate-reducing bacteria in floating macrophyte rhizospheres from an Amazonian floodplain lake in Bolivia and their association with Hg methylation.

Authors:  Darío Achá; Volga Iñiguez; Marc Roulet; Jean Remy Davée Guimarães; Ruddy Luna; Lucia Alanoca; Samanta Sanchez
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Genomic insight into iron acquisition by sulfate-reducing bacteria in microaerophilic environments.

Authors:  Larry L Barton; Americo G Duarte; Lucian C Staicu
Journal:  Biometals       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 2.949

8.  Oxygen Reduction Reaction Affected by Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria: Different Roles of Bacterial Cells and Metabolites.

Authors:  Jiajia Wu; Huaiqun Liu; Peng Wang; Dun Zhang; Yan Sun; Ee Li
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.461

9.  Growth of the obligate anaerobe Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough under continuous low oxygen concentration sparging: impact of the membrane-bound oxygen reductases.

Authors:  Fanny Ramel; Gael Brasseur; Laetitia Pieulle; Odile Valette; Agnès Hirschler-Réa; Marie Laure Fardeau; Alain Dolla
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Novel Large Sulfur Bacteria in the Metagenomes of Groundwater-Fed Chemosynthetic Microbial Mats in the Lake Huron Basin.

Authors:  Allison M Sharrar; Beverly E Flood; Jake V Bailey; Daniel S Jones; Bopaiah A Biddanda; Steven A Ruberg; Daniel N Marcus; Gregory J Dick
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 5.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.