Literature DB >> 11055035

The case for a new system for oversight of research on human subjects.

K Jamrozik1.   

Abstract

The increasing emphasis on evidence-based clinical practice has thrown into sharp focus multiple deficiencies in current systems of ethical review. This paper argues that a complete overhaul of systems for ethical oversight of studies involving human subjects is now required as developments in medical, epidemiological and genetic research have outstripped existing structures for ethical supervision. It shows that many problems are now evident and concludes that sequential and piecemeal amendments to present arrangements are inadequate to address these. At their core present systems of ethical review still rely on the integrity and judgment of individual investigators. One possible alternative is to train and license research investigators, make explicit their responsibilities and have ethics committees devote much more of their time to monitoring research activity in order to detect those infringing the rules.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11055035      PMCID: PMC1733298          DOI: 10.1136/jme.26.5.334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  15 in total

Review 1.  Are ethics committees retarding the improvement of health services in Australia?

Authors:  K Jamrozik; M Kolybaba
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1999-01-04       Impact factor: 7.738

2.  Paul Ehrlich: pathfinder in cell biology. 1. Chronicle of his life and accomplishments in immunology, cancer research, and chemotherapy.

Authors:  F H Kasten
Journal:  Biotech Histochem       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.718

3.  Smoking and carcinoma of the lung; preliminary report.

Authors:  R DOLL; A B HILL
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1950-09-30

4.  Tobacco smoking as a possible etiologic factor in bronchiogenic carcinoma; a study of 684 proved cases.

Authors:  E L WYNDER; E A GRAHAM
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1950-05-27

5.  The Nuremberg Code: Hippocratic ethics and human rights.

Authors:  E Shuster
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-03-28       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Alarums false, alarums real: challenges and threats to the future of epidemiology.

Authors:  M B Bracken
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.797

7.  Delays and diversity in the practice of local research ethics committees.

Authors:  A H Ahmed; K G Nicholson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Attempt to fulfil Koch's postulates for pyloric Campylobacter.

Authors:  B J Marshall; J A Armstrong; D B McGechie; R J Glancy
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1985-04-15       Impact factor: 7.738

9.  Isn't one institutional ethics committee's approval enough?

Authors:  M A Smith; B Jalaludin; S R Leeder; W T Smith
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1994-05-16       Impact factor: 7.738

10.  A case-control study of traffic risk factors and child pedestrian injury.

Authors:  M R Stevenson; K D Jamrozik; J Spittle
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  5 in total

1.  Research ethics paperwork: what is the plot we seem to have lost?

Authors:  Konrad Jamrozik
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-31

Review 2.  Ethics, audit, and research: all shades of grey.

Authors:  Derick T Wade
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-02-26

Review 3.  Ethics review of pediatric multi-center drug trials.

Authors:  Allison C Needham; Mufiza Z Kapadia; Martin Offringa
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 4.  Research governance: regulating risk and reducing harm?

Authors:  Sara Shaw; Geraldine Barrett
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 18.000

5.  Research ethics committees: agents of research policy?

Authors:  Elina Hemminki
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2005-10-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.