Literature DB >> 25354988

Ethics review of pediatric multi-center drug trials.

Allison C Needham1, Mufiza Z Kapadia, Martin Offringa.   

Abstract

The assessment of safety and efficacy of therapeutics for children and adolescents requires the use of multi-centered designs. However, the need to obtain ethical approval from multiple independent research ethics boards (REBs) presents as a challenge to investigators and sponsors who must consider local requirements while ensuring that the protection of human subjects is consistent across sites. In pediatrics, this requirement is complicated by pediatric-specific ethical concerns such as the acquisition of assent and consent and the need for pediatric expertise to assess the scholarly merit of the proposed research. Efforts to tackle these challenges have focused on the process of ethics review, which will improve efficiency. In addition to improving process, we suggest further research to fill gaps in the evidence base for recommendations and decisions made by REBs, specifically their effectiveness to protect human subjects. Evidence gathered will contribute to the successful development, adoption and implementation of harmonized guidance to apply ethics principles in order to protect children through research rather than from research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25354988     DOI: 10.1007/s40272-014-0098-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Drugs        ISSN: 1174-5878            Impact factor:   3.022


  48 in total

1.  What makes clinical research ethical?

Authors:  E J Emanuel; D Wendler; C Grady
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000 May 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Nature and extent of changes in the patient's information sheets of international multicentre clinical trials as requested by Spanish Research Ethics Committees.

Authors:  Rafael Dal-Ré; Elena Morejón; Rafael Ortega
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  2004-12-04       Impact factor: 1.725

Review 3.  A review finds that multicenter studies face substantial challenges but strategies exist to achieve Institutional Review Board approval.

Authors:  Sarah M Greene; Ann M Geiger
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Ethical key issues and fundamental rights in paediatric research.

Authors:  Annagrazia Altavilla
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Problematic variation in local institutional review of a multicenter genetic epidemiology study.

Authors:  Rita McWilliams; Julie Hoover-Fong; Ada Hamosh; Suzanne Beck; Terri Beaty; Garry Cutting
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-07-16       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Variability in IRBs regarding parental acceptance of passive consent.

Authors:  Renee A Higgerson; Lauren E W Olsho; LeeAnn M Christie; Kyle Rehder; Teresa Doksum; Rainer Gedeit; John S Giuliano; Beth Brennan; Rachael Wendlandt; Adrienne G Randolph
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  How do institutional review boards apply the federal risk and benefit standards for pediatric research?

Authors:  Seema Shah; Amy Whittle; Benjamin Wilfond; Gary Gensler; David Wendler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Ontogeny of human hepatic and intestinal transporter gene expression during childhood: age matters.

Authors:  Miriam G Mooij; Ute I Schwarz; Barbara A E de Koning; J Steven Leeder; Roger Gaedigk; Janneke N Samsom; Edwin Spaans; Johannes B van Goudoever; Dick Tibboel; Richard B Kim; Saskia N de Wildt
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.922

9.  Children are not just small adults: the urgent need for high-quality trial evidence in children.

Authors:  Terry P Klassen; Lisa Hartling; Jonathan C Craig; Martin Offringa
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  How do we know that research ethics committees are really working? The neglected role of outcomes assessment in research ethics review.

Authors:  Carl H Coleman; Marie-Charlotte Bouësseau
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.652

View more
  3 in total

1.  A call for a streamlined ethics review process for multijurisdictional, child health research studies.

Authors:  Brigitte Lemyre; Jaya P Bodani; Stefani Doucette; Michael S Dunn; Deepak Louis; Luis Monterrosa; Amit Mukerji; Georg M Schmölzer; Prakeshkumar Shah; Balpreet Singh; Jonathan Wong; Thierry Lacaze-Masmonteil; Martin Offringa
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Creating a new ethical climate for drug research in children and pregnant women.

Authors:  Doreen Matsui; Gideon Koren
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.022

3.  Innovative approaches to investigator-initiated, multicentre paediatric clinical trials in Canada.

Authors:  Lauren E Kelly; Lawrence Richer; Samina Ali; Amy C Plint; Naveen Poonai; Stephen B Freedman; Lisa Knisley; Carolyn Shimmin; Serena Hickes; Geert W 't Jong; Petros Pechlivanoglou; Martin Offringa; Thierry Lacaze; Terry P Klassen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.