Literature DB >> 10026670

Are ethics committees retarding the improvement of health services in Australia?

K Jamrozik1, M Kolybaba.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10026670     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1999.tb126862.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  The case for a new system for oversight of research on human subjects.

Authors:  K Jamrozik
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  Institutional review boards and multisite studies in health services research: is there a better way?

Authors:  Jennifer L Gold; Carolyn S Dewa
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Innovations in the Ethical Review of Health-Related Quality Improvement and Research: The Alberta Research Ethics Community Consensus Initiative (ARECCI).

Authors:  Brad Hagen; Maeve O'Beirne; Sunil Desai; Michael Stingl; Cathy Anne Pachnowski; Sarah Hayward
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2007-05

4.  The Myth of Community Differences as the Cause of Variations Among IRBs.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2011

5.  Situation analysis of local ethical committees in medical sciences in Iran.

Authors:  Yousef Fakour; Monir Baradaran Eftekhari; Zohre Haghighi; Najmeh Khosravan Mehr; Farzaneh Hejazi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.852

6.  Research ethics committees: agents of research policy?

Authors:  Elina Hemminki
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2005-10-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.