Literature DB >> 11054233

Endovascular procedures under near-real-time magnetic resonance imaging guidance: an experimental feasibility study.

Y M Dion1, H Ben El Kadi, C Boudoux, J Gourdon, N Chakfé, A Traoré, C Moisan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of insertion of endovascular stents and the precision of an open-field interventional magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) system in an in vivo model.
METHODS: A feasibility study was undertaken at a university-affiliated hospital. Three male piglets with an average age of 6 months and a weight between 70 and 77 kg and two 3-month-old male piglets that weighed 40 to 44 kg were anesthetized. The five piglets underwent placement of nitinol stents inserted through the right femoral artery, under the guidance of a SIGNA-SP 0. 5T open-configuration iMRI unit. With a dedicated high-resolution near-real-time MRI sequence, the stent was guided and deployed onto a predefined target.
RESULTS: The main outcome measures were the duration of the procedure from the beginning of positioning to the end of deployment of the stent, the final position of the stent in relation to the target on the iMRI screen, and comparison with autopsy findings. Three stents were deployed within the aorta at the level of the renal arteries, and two were deployed within the right iliac artery just below the aortic trifurcation. The average duration of the endovascular deployment was 13 minutes. There was an agreement of 0.6 mm in the position of the stent as observed on iMR images and found at autopsy. When the piglets were sacrificed, the average distance between the stents and the predefined target was 7. 8 mm, mostly because of the migration of one stent. Axial views allowed for accurate determination of stent impaction on the vascular wall.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the feasibility of stent deployment under near-real-time MRI guidance. It also emphasizes some inherent characteristics that hold promise with regard to other conventional techniques: stents and vascular structures are visualized in near-real-time in any desired plane, and the technique is performed without the potential adverse effects of ionizing radiations and iodinated contrast agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11054233     DOI: 10.1067/mva.2000.109208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  9 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of coronary atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Zahi A Fayad; Robin P Choudhury; Valentin Fuster
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 2.  Cardiovascular interventional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Robert J Lederman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Interventional and intraoperative MR: review and update of techniques and clinical experience.

Authors:  Thomas Schulz; Silvia Puccini; Jens-Peter Schneider; Thomas Kahn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Real-time, Interactive MRI for cardiovascular interventions.

Authors:  Elliot R McVeigh; Michael A Guttman; Peter Kellman; Amish N Raval; Robert J Lederman
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Microcatheter tip enhancement in fluoroscopy: a comparison of techniques.

Authors:  Akihiro Takemura; Kenneth R Hoffmann; Masayuki Suzuki; Zhou Wang; Hussain S Rangwala; Hajime Harauchi; Stephen Rudin; Tokuo Umeda
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  An algorithm for tracking microcatheters in fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Akihiro Takemura; Kenneth R Hoffmann; Masayuki Suzuki; Zhou Wang; Hussain S Rangwala; Hajime Harauchi; Stephen Rudin; Tokuo Umeda
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging-guided vascular interventions.

Authors:  Cengizhan Ozturk; Michael Guttman; Elliot R McVeigh; Robert J Lederman
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-10

Review 8.  MR fluoroscopy in vascular and cardiac interventions (review).

Authors:  Maythem Saeed; Steve W Hetts; Joey English; Mark Wilson
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  Interventional cardiovascular magnetic resonance: still tantalizing.

Authors:  Kanishka Ratnayaka; Anthony Z Faranesh; Michael A Guttman; Ozgur Kocaturk; Christina E Saikus; Robert J Lederman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 5.364

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.