Literature DB >> 11045361

Proprioception does not quickly drift during visual occlusion.

M Desmurget1, P Vindras, H Gréa, P Viviani, S T Grafton.   

Abstract

Several perceptual studies have shown that the ability to estimate the location of the arm degrades quickly during visual occlusion. To account for this effect, it has been suggested that proprioception drifts when not continuously calibrated by vision. In the present study, we re-evaluated this hypothesis by isolating the proprioceptive component of position sense (i.e., the subjects were forced to rely exclusively on proprioception to locate their hand, which was not the case in earlier studies). Three experiments were conducted. In experiment 1, subjects were required to estimate the location of their unseen right hand, at rest, using a visual spot controlled by the left hand through a joystick. Results showed that the mean accuracy was identical whether the localization task was performed immediately after the positioning of the hand or after a 10-s delay. In experiments 2 and 3, subjects were required to point, without vision of their limb, to visual targets. These two experiments relied on the demonstration that biases in the perception of the initial hand location induced systematic variations of the movement characteristics (initial direction, final accuracy, end-point variability). For these motor tasks, the subjects did not pay attention to the initial hand location, which removed the possible occurrence of confounding cognitive strategies. Results indicated that movement characteristics were, on average, not affected when a 15-s or 20-s delay was introduced between the positioning of the arm at the starting point and the presentation of the target. When considered together, our results suggest that proprioception does not quickly drift in the absence of visual information. The potential origin of the discrepancy between our results and earlier studies is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11045361     DOI: 10.1007/s002210000473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

1.  Movement speed effects on limb position drift.

Authors:  Liana E Brown; David A Rosenbaum; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Interaction between gaze and visual and proprioceptive position judgements.

Authors:  Katja Fiehler; Frank Rösler; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual afferent information dominates other sources of afferent information during mixed practice of a video-aiming task.

Authors:  Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration.

Authors:  Jeroen B J Smeets; John J van den Dobbelsteen; Denise D J de Grave; Robert J van Beers; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The effects of secondary task interference on shape reproduction.

Authors:  Blake Cameron Wesley Martin; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Contribution of visual and proprioceptive information to the precision of reaching movements.

Authors:  Simona Monaco; Gregory Króliczak; Derek J Quinlan; Patrizia Fattori; Claudio Galletti; Melvyn A Goodale; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Presbypropria: the effects of physiological ageing on proprioceptive control.

Authors:  Matthieu P Boisgontier; Isabelle Olivier; Olivier Chenu; Vincent Nougier
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2011-08-18

8.  Congruent visual and proprioceptive information results in a better encoding of initial hand position.

Authors:  Louis-Nicolas Veilleux; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Spatially selective enhancement of proprioceptive acuity following motor learning.

Authors:  Jeremy D Wong; Elizabeth T Wilson; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Judgements of hand location and hand spacing show minimal proprioceptive drift.

Authors:  Alex Rana; Annie A Butler; Simon C Gandevia; Martin E Héroux
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.