Literature DB >> 11044647

Information and communication in the context of a clinical trial.

P Hietanen1, A R Aro, K Holli, P Absetz.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the communicative needs of the patients in the context of being invited to participate in a clinical trial. A questionnaire was sent to 299 patients with breast cancer randomised in a trial of adjuvant therapy. It was returned by 261 (87%) of them. Ninety-one per cent (231/255) of the patients regarded the information provided as easy or quite easy to understand. However, the method of treatment allocation was unclear to most patients: 51% (128/251) thought that the doctor had chosen the treatment while only 23% (57/251) knew that they had been randomised. Younger and better educated patients had a better understanding. For 55% (125/226) of the patients written information had been helpful in decision making. This correlated highly with the education of the patient. Sixty-eight per cent (174/255) of the patients thought that they had enough time for decision-making. Less educated patients and older patients had needed more time. Eighty-seven per cent (218/251) were happy with their decision to participate. While most patients are satisfied with the information received, there is a poor understanding of how treatment is allocated. Information should be modified for older and less-educated patients. The needs of the patients when offered participation in a clinical trial are clear information, enough time to consider the options and psychological support.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11044647     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00191-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  22 in total

1.  Comparing the understanding of subjects receiving a candidate malaria vaccine in the United States and Mali.

Authors:  Ruth D Ellis; Issaka Sagara; Anna Durbin; Alassane Dicko; Donna Shaffer; Louis Miller; Mahamadoun H Assadou; Mamady Kone; Beh Kamate; Ousmane Guindo; Michael P Fay; Dapa A Diallo; Ogobara K Doumbo; Ezekiel J Emanuel; Joseph Millum
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.345

Review 2.  The quality of informed consent: mapping the landscape. A review of empirical data from developing and developed countries.

Authors:  Amulya Mandava; Christine Pace; Benjamin Campbell; Ezekiel Emanuel; Christine Grady
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  The Role of Clinical Trial Participation in Cancer Research: Barriers, Evidence, and Strategies.

Authors:  Joseph M Unger; Elise Cook; Eric Tai; Archie Bleyer
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2016

4.  Quality of parental consent in a Ugandan malaria study.

Authors:  Christine Pace; Ambrose Talisuna; David Wendler; Faustin Maiso; Fred Wabwire-Mangen; Nathan Bakyaita; Edith Okiria; Elizabeth S Garrett-Mayer; Ezekiel Emanuel; Christine Grady
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Patient advocacy and patient centredness in participant recruitment to randomized-controlled trials: implications for informed consent.

Authors:  Zelda Tomlin; Isabel deSalis; Merran Toerien; Jenny L Donovan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Do cancer patients fully understand clinical trial participation? A pilot study to assess informed consent and patient expectations.

Authors:  Ricardo J Wray; Jo Ellen Stryker; Eric Winer; George Demetri; Karen M Emmons
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  A comparison of patient knowledge of clinical trials and trialist priorities.

Authors:  P Cameron; G R Pond; R Y Xu; P M Ellis; J R Goffin
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  Participation in clinical research: perspectives of adult patients and parents of pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Florian Keusch; Rohini Rao; Lawrence Chang; James Lepkowski; Pavan Reddy; Sung Won Choi
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Benefits and burdens of participation in a longitudinal clinical trial.

Authors:  Jaime Lazovski; Marcelo Losso; Benjamin Krohmal; Ezekiel J Emanuel; Christine Grady; David Wendler
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Clinical trials: Predictors of knowledge and attitudes towards participation.

Authors:  Oriana Awwad; Sajeda Maaiah; Basima A Almomani
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.