Literature DB >> 11041902

Safety and efficacy of meloxicam in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a 12-week, double-blind, multiple-dose, placebo-controlled trial. The Meloxicam Osteoarthritis Investigators.

D Yocum1, R Fleischmann, P Dalgin, J Caldwell, D Hall, P Roszko.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Meloxicam (Mobic; Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Conn) is an enolic acid derivative of the oxicam group of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) whose mechanism of action may be related to prostaglandin (cyclooxygenase) synthetase inhibition. In previous studies, meloxicam has been found to be safe and effective in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) at doses of 7.5 to 15 mg daily. To evaluate a lower dose and a different patient population, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of 3 doses of meloxicam vs placebo and diclofenac for the treatment of OA among patients with symptom exacerbations.
METHODS: In this double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicenter study, 774 patients with confirmed OA of the hip or knee and a flare were randomized and treated with daily oral administration of meloxicam tablets (at dosages of 3.75, 7.5, or 15 mg/d), diclofenac (100 mg [50 mg twice daily]), or placebo. Treatment was for 12 weeks, with regular assessments for drug safety and efficacy. Safety was assessed by evaluation of adverse events, vital signs, and laboratory data. Primary efficacy variables included the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index, the patient's overall assessment of pain, and the patient's and investigator's overall assessment of disease activity.
RESULTS: The incidence of all adverse events was lower at each dosage of meloxicam than for diclofenac but greater than for placebo. However, the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events and dropout rates because of such events was the same for meloxicam as for placebo and lower than for diclofenac. Meloxicam, at 7.5 and 15 mg/d, and diclofenac were statistically significantly more effective than placebo for all end points, while the 3.75-mg/d dosage of meloxicam did not always reach statistical significance for all end points. Efficacy was evident after 2 weeks of treatment, improved with increasing doses, and was maintained until the end of the trial.
CONCLUSIONS: Meloxicam is a safe and effective medication for the symptomatic treatment of OA. The data support consideration of 7.5 to 15 mg of meloxicam once daily to treat the pain and stiffness of OA, with gastrointestinal tolerability comparable to that of placebo. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2947-2954

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11041902     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.160.19.2947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  22 in total

1.  A naturalistic study of the determinants of health related quality of life improvement in osteoarthritic patients treated with non-specific non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Authors:  V Rabenda; N Burlet; O Ethgen; F Raeman; J Belaiche; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-11-04       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  Adverse effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the colon.

Authors:  Anne Ballinger
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2008-10

3.  Meta-analysis of dropout rates in randomized controlled clinical trials: opioid analgesia for osteoarthritis pain.

Authors:  M Gehling; B Hermann; M Tryba
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs vs Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Arthritis Pain: A Randomized Withdrawal Trial.

Authors:  Liana Fraenkel; Eugenia Buta; Lisa Suter; Maureen Dubreuil; Charles Levy; Catherine Najem; Matthew Brennan; Barbara Corn; Robert Kerns; Joseph Goulet
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Comparison of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors use in Australia and Nova Scotia (Canada).

Authors:  Nadia Barozzi; Ingrid Sketris; Charmaine Cooke; Susan Tett
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Comparison of analgesic effect, knee joint function recovery, and safety profiles between pre-operative and post-operative administrations of meloxicam in knee osteoarthritis patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yang Shao; Xiaoyan Zhao; Yu Zhai; Junfeng Yang; Shanfu Wang; Lei Liu; Jianwei Wang
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Effect of a topical diclofenac solution for relieving symptoms of primary osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Arthur A M Bookman; Kate S A Williams; J Zev Shainhouse
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-08-17       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Channelling bias and the incidence of gastrointestinal haemorrhage in users of meloxicam, coxibs, and older, non-specific non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Authors:  T M MacDonald; S V Morant; J L Goldstein; T A Burke; D Pettitt
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 9.  Time dependent risk of gastrointestinal complications induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use: a consensus statement using a meta-analytic approach.

Authors:  F Richy; O Bruyere; O Ethgen; V Rabenda; G Bouvenot; M Audran; G Herrero-Beaumont; A Moore; R Eliakim; M Haim; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  A pharmacokinetic comparison of meloxicam and ketoprofen following oral administration to healthy dogs.

Authors:  L Montoya; L Ambros; V Kreil; R Bonafine; G Albarellos; R Hallu; A Soraci
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.459

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.