Literature DB >> 32702101

Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs vs Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Arthritis Pain: A Randomized Withdrawal Trial.

Liana Fraenkel1,2, Eugenia Buta1,3, Lisa Suter1,2, Maureen Dubreuil4,5, Charles Levy6, Catherine Najem7, Matthew Brennan1,3, Barbara Corn1, Robert Kerns3, Joseph Goulet1,3.   

Abstract

Importance: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly prescribed for knee osteoarthritis. However, they are associated with uncertain long-term clinical benefit and significant toxic effects. Objective: To evaluate whether discontinuing NSAIDs and engaging in a telephone-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) program is noninferior to continuing NSAIDs for patients with knee osteoarthritis. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Stopping NSAIDs for Arthritis Pain multicenter randomized withdrawal trial was conducted for 364 patients taking NSAIDs for knee osteoarthritis pain on most days of the week for at least 3 months between September 1, 2013, and September 30, 2018. Analysis was performed on an intent-to-treat basis. Interventions: Participants discontinued their current NSAID and took 15 mg per day of meloxicam daily during a 2-week run-in period. Those who remained eligible were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive meloxicam or placebo for 4 weeks (blinded phase 1). Participants receiving meloxicam then continued this medication for 10 weeks, while those receiving placebo participated in a 10-week CBT program (unblinded phase 2). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measure was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score at 4 weeks with the noninferiority margin set at 1. Secondary outcomes included the area under the curve of the pain score after 4 weeks as well as the WOMAC pain score, area under the curve of the pain score, WOMAC disability score, and global impression of change after treatment at 14 weeks.
Results: A total of 180 participants (161 men; mean [SD] age, 58. 2 [11.8] years) were randomized to receive placebo followed by CBT, and a total of 184 participants (154 men; mean [SD] age, 58.5 [10.0] years) were randomized to receive meloxicam. After adjustment for baseline pain and study site, the estimated mean difference in WOMAC pain score between the placebo and meloxicam groups after 4 weeks was 1.4 (95% CI, 0.8-2.0; noninferiority test P = .92). At week 14, the adjusted mean difference in WOMAC pain score between the placebo (followed by CBT) and meloxicam groups was 0.8 (95% CI, 0.2-1.4; noninferiority P = .28). There was no statistically significant difference in the global impression of change (mean difference in scores, -0.2; 95% CI, -0.4 to 0.1; P = .15) or lower extremity disability (mean difference in scores, 0.9; 95% CI, -1.4 to 3.2; P = .45) between the 2 groups after 14 weeks. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with knee osteoarthritis, placebo and CBT (after placebo) are inferior to meloxicam. However, the WOMAC pain score differences between the 2 groups were small, and there were no statistically significant differences in participants' global impression of change or function after 14 weeks. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01799213.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32702101      PMCID: PMC7372512          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  30 in total

Review 1.  EULAR Recommendations 2003: an evidence based approach to the management of knee osteoarthritis: Report of a Task Force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT).

Authors:  K M Jordan; N K Arden; M Doherty; B Bannwarth; J W J Bijlsma; P Dieppe; K Gunther; H Hauselmann; G Herrero-Beaumont; P Kaklamanis; S Lohmander; B Leeb; M Lequesne; B Mazieres; E Martin-Mola; K Pavelka; A Pendleton; L Punzi; U Serni; B Swoboda; G Verbruggen; I Zimmerman-Gorska; M Dougados
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  Cognitive therapy: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Aaron T Beck; David J A Dozois
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 13.739

Review 3.  Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, including cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, in osteoarthritic knee pain: meta-analysis of randomised placebo controlled trials.

Authors:  Jan Magnus Bjordal; Anne Elisabeth Ljunggren; Atle Klovning; Lars Slørdal
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-11-23

4.  Pain coping skills training and lifestyle behavioral weight management in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Tamara J Somers; James A Blumenthal; Farshid Guilak; Virginia B Kraus; Daniel O Schmitt; Michael A Babyak; Linda W Craighead; David S Caldwell; John R Rice; Daphne C McKee; Rebecca A Shelby; Lisa C Campbell; Jennifer J Pells; Ershela L Sims; Robin Queen; James W Carson; Mark Connelly; Kim E Dixon; Lara J LaCaille; Janet L Huebner; Jack W Rejeski; Francis J Keefe
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Health outcomes of two telephone interventions for patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis.

Authors:  R Maisiak; J Austin; L Heck
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1996-08

Review 6.  Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: adverse effects and their prevention.

Authors:  Harald E Vonkeman; Mart A F J van de Laar
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 7.  Epidemiology of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Tuhina Neogi; Yuqing Zhang
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 2.670

8.  A comparison of the efficacy and safety of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents versus acetaminophen in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chin Lee; Walter L Straus; Robert Balshaw; Suna Barlas; Suzanne Vogel; Thomas J Schnitzer
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-10-15

Review 9.  Outcome measures in osteoarthritis: randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Vibeke Strand; Ariella Kelman
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 10.  Psychological interventions for arthritis pain management in adults: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kim E Dixon; Francis J Keefe; Cindy D Scipio; LisaCaitlin M Perri; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.267

View more
  4 in total

1.  Cartilage-targeting peptide-modified dual-drug delivery nanoplatform with NIR laser response for osteoarthritis therapy.

Authors:  Song Xue; Xiaojun Zhou; Weilin Sang; Cong Wang; Haiming Lu; Yiming Xu; Yiming Zhong; Libo Zhu; Chuanglong He; Jinzhong Ma
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-01-26

2.  Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) alleviates senescence, apoptosis, and extracellular matrix degradation in osteoarthritis via the SIRT1-mTOR signaling pathway.

Authors:  Hongwei Lu; Chao Jia; Dengying Wu; Haidong Jin; Zeng Lin; Jun Pan; Xiucui Li; Wei Wang
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 8.469

Review 3.  Neuroimaging Mechanism of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Pain Management.

Authors:  Shangyi Bao; Mengyuan Qiao; Yutong Lu; Yunlan Jiang
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.037

4.  Effect of Intramuscular vs Intra-articular Glucocorticoid Injection on Pain Among Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis: The KIS Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Qiuke Wang; Marianne F Mol; P Koen Bos; Desirée M J Dorleijn; Marijn Vis; Jacobijn Gussekloo; Patrick J E Bindels; Jos Runhaar; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-04-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.