Literature DB >> 15528282

A naturalistic study of the determinants of health related quality of life improvement in osteoarthritic patients treated with non-specific non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

V Rabenda1, N Burlet, O Ethgen, F Raeman, J Belaiche, J-Y Reginster.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To capture changes in the quality of life (QoL) occurring in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) during treatment with non-specific non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and to identify factors that predict such changes.
METHODS: A naturalistic, prospective follow up of 783 patients with OA in whom primary care physicians decided to start treatment with non-selective NSAIDs. Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA index (WOMAC) were assessed at baseline and after 3 months. Baseline results were compared with QoL values in 4800 subjects randomly selected from the general population. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify determinants of QoL at baseline and measures influencing changes in SF-36 or WOMAC during follow up.
RESULTS: All QoL dimensions were significantly (p<0.01) decreased in patients with OA compared with controls. Significant improvement (p<0.05) in four dimensions of the SF-36 (vitality, role emotional, role physical, bodily pain) and in all components of the WOMAC was seen between baseline and month 3. Older age, female sex, longer duration of OA, and a higher number of comorbidities were the major determinants of a poor QoL at baseline. Maximal benefit from non-specific NSAIDs was seen in patients with the most severe impairment in QoL and the shortest duration of OA.
CONCLUSION: OA negatively impacts all dimensions of the QoL. Non-specific NSAIDs improve the QoL in patients with OA treated in a "real life setting". The profile of patients receiving maximal benefit from such treatment may be of interest for health providers, enabling them to decide who should preferentially be given cytoprotective treatments or coxibs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15528282      PMCID: PMC1755468          DOI: 10.1136/ard.2004.026658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  28 in total

1.  Radiologic features poorly predict clinical outcomes in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Olivier Bruyere; Aline Honore; Lucio C Rovati; Giampaolo Giacovelli; Yves E Henrotin; Laurence Seidel; Jean-Yves L Reginster
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Late life function and disability instrument: I. Development and evaluation of the disability component.

Authors:  Alan M Jette; Stephen M Haley; Wendy J Coster; Jill T Kooyoomjian; Suzette Levenson; Tim Heeren; Jacqueline Ashba
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.053

3.  Health-related quality of life and cost of ambulatory care in osteoporosis: how may such outcome measures be valuable information to health decision makers and payers?

Authors:  O Ethgen; V Tellier; W B Sedrine; J De Maeseneer; C Gosset; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Quality of life in chronic NSAID users: a comparison of the effect of omeprazole and misoprostol.

Authors:  N Yeomans; I Wilson; G Långström; C Hawkey; J Naesdal; A Walan; I Wiklund
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Drug switching patterns among patients taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a retrospective cohort study of a general practitioners database in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  M Langman; K H Kahler; S X Kong; Q Zhang; E Finch; J D Bentkover; E J Stewart
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2001 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.890

6.  Impact of osteoarthritis and analgesic treatment on quality of life of an elderly population.

Authors:  A Briggs; E Scott; K Steele
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Health related quality of life in a population sample with arthritis.

Authors:  C L Hill; J Parsons; A Taylor; G Leach
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.666

8.  Celecoxib versus diclofenac in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  F McKenna; D Borenstein; H Wendt; C Wallemark; J B Lefkowith; G S Geis
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Glucosamine sulfate use and delay of progression of knee osteoarthritis: a 3-year, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study.

Authors:  Karel Pavelká; Jindriska Gatterová; Marta Olejarová; Stanislav Machacek; Giampaolo Giacovelli; Lucio C Rovati
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-10-14

Review 10.  The prevalence and burden of arthritis.

Authors:  J Y Reginster
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.580

View more
  4 in total

1.  Low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis pain: impact on quality of life in a controlled trial.

Authors:  Vibeke Strand; Martin Bergman; Jasvinder A Singh; Allan Gibofsky; Alan Kivitz; Clarence Young
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Evaluation of patients' and physicians' expectations and attributes of osteoarthritis treatment using Kano methodology.

Authors:  J Cordero-Ampuero; A Darder; J Santillana; M T Caloto; G Nocea
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Treatment of chronic non-malignant pain in the elderly: safety considerations.

Authors:  Jonathan Bruce Barber; Stephen J Gibson
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  ICRS Recommendation Document: Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Use in Patients with Articular Cartilage Defects.

Authors:  Ewa M Roos; Luella Engelhart; Jonas Ranstam; Allen F Anderson; Jay J Irrgang; Robert G Marx; Yelverton Tegner; Aileen M Davis
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.634

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.