Literature DB >> 11041108

Information needs and preferences for participation in treatment decisions among Swedish breast cancer patients.

B Wallberg1, H Michelson, M Nystedt, C Bolund, L F Degner, N Wilking.   

Abstract

Patient participation in treatment decisions presupposes well-informed patients. The purpose of this study was to determine Swedish breast cancer patients' information needs and their preferences for participation in treatment decisions. Patients (n = 201) were interviewed on nine categories of information and five patient roles, using paired comparisons. Patients gave priority to facts about disease and treatment (chances of cure, stage of disease, treatment options). A collaborative role in treatment decisions was preferred by 87% of the patients. Most patients (56%) preferred a passive form of collaboration: I prefer that my doctor makes the final decision about my treatment but seriously considers my opinion. Younger and better educated patients tended to prefer a more active role. Many patients wanted to be more active (20%) and some more passive (8%) than they actually were. Patients gave priority to disease-specific information, but this reflected needs other than taking control of treatment decisions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11041108     DOI: 10.1080/028418600750013375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  35 in total

1.  Collaborative/active participation per se does not decrease anxiety in breast cancer.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Kahán; Katalin Varga; Rita Dudás; Tibor Nyári; László Thurzó
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Decision-Making Preferences Among Older Hispanics Participating in a Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Program.

Authors:  Jennifer C Molokwu; Eribeth Penaranda; Navkiran Shokar
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-10

3.  When patients lack capacity: the roles that patients with terminal diagnoses would choose for their physicians and loved ones in making medical decisions.

Authors:  Marie T Nolan; Mark Hughes; Derek Paul Narendra; Johanna R Sood; Peter B Terry; Alan B Astrow; Joan Kub; Richard E Thompson; Daniel P Sulmasy
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Patient and physician decision styles and breast cancer chemotherapy use in older women: Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocol 369901.

Authors:  Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Leigh Anne Faul; George Luta; Solomon B Makgoeng; Claudine Isaacs; Kathryn Taylor; Vanessa B Sheppard; Michelle Tallarico; William T Barry; Harvey J Cohen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Antecedent characteristics of online cancer information seeking among rural breast cancer patients: an application of the Cognitive-Social Health Information Processing (C-SHIP) model.

Authors:  Bret R Shaw; Lori L Dubenske; Jeong Yeob Han; Ludmila Cofta-Woerpel; Nigel Bush; David H Gustafson; Fiona McTavish
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2008-06

6.  Older adults newly diagnosed with symptomatic myeloma and treatment decision making.

Authors:  Joseph D Tariman; Ardith Doorenbos; Karen G Schepp; Seema Singhal; Donna L Berry
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 7.  Preferred and actual participation roles during health care decision making in persons with cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  J D Tariman; D L Berry; B Cochrane; A Doorenbos; K Schepp
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Perceived importance of evidence-based psychosocial clinical guidelines for Hong Kong Chinese women with breast cancer: opinions of patients and health care providers.

Authors:  Wendy Wing Tak Lam; Cecilia Fabrizio; Ella Ho; Lillian Chan; Richard Fielding
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Implementing breast cancer decision aids in community sites: barriers and resources.

Authors:  Kerry A Silvia; Elissa M Ozanne; Karen R Sepucha
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  How would terminally ill patients have others make decisions for them in the event of decisional incapacity? A longitudinal study.

Authors:  Daniel P Sulmasy; Mark T Hughes; Richard E Thompson; Alan B Astrow; Peter B Terry; Joan Kub; Marie T Nolan
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 5.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.