Literature DB >> 11036290

Bedside percutaneous tracheostomy: prospective evaluation of a modification of the current technique in 100 patients.

G C Velmahos1, H Gomez, C M Boicey, D Demetriades.   

Abstract

Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) is being increasingly used. Concerns have been raised as to its safety, especially when it is done at the bedside. A prospective evaluation was conducted of 100 consecutive, unselected critically ill patients with PDT. The mean intensive care unit (ICU) stay before PDT was 12 days. One surgeon performed PDT alone (5 cases) or assisted residents (95 cases) in all operations; 84 were performed at the ICU bedside. Only the first six patients were taken to the operating room solely for tracheostomy. A modified technique was used: (1) the endotracheal tube was left in place during sequential dilations; (2) dilators were inserted in a 60-degree cephalad orientation to the skin and directed caudally after penetration of the anterior tracheal wall; (3) a digit was inserted through the tracheal opening to guide withdrawal of the endotracheal tube to the level of the vocal cords; and (4) size 8 tracheostomy cannulas were inserted over 28F dilators. The average time from skin incision to insertion of the tracheostomy tube was 12 minutes (< 10 minutes, 41 patients; 10 to 15 minutes, 37 patients; > 15 minutes, 22 patients). Sixty-five percent had unfavorable anatomic conditions due to spinal precautions or diffuse neck edema. Postoperative complications occurred in four patients; surgical emphysema after tracheal lacerations in three, cannula dislodgment in one. All complications were successfully managed without an operation by tube exchange (n = 3) or observation (n = 1); there was no procedure-related mortality. Forty patients were available for long-term follow-up (6-18 months after tracheostomy) by telephone; one had persistent hoarseness without respiratory difficulty. We concluded that bedside PDT is safe and easy to teach when performed with a technique that ensures correct instrumentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11036290     DOI: 10.1007/s002680010180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  4 in total

1.  Endoscopy is useful during percutaneous tracheostomy.

Authors:  Paul Jefferson; David R Ball
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-20

2.  Fantoni translaryngeal tracheostomy versus ciaglia blue rhino percutaneous tracheostomy: a retrospective comparison.

Authors:  Duilio Divisi; Giuseppe Altamura; Sergio Di Tommaso; Gabriella Di Leonardo; Emilio Rosa; Carlo De Sanctis; Roberto Crisci
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Use of percutaneous tracheostomy in intensive care units in Spain. Results of a national survey.

Authors:  José M Añón; Maria Paz Escuela; Vicente Gómez; Abelardo García de Lorenzo; Juan C Montejo; Jorge López
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Modified translaryngeal tracheostomy for ventilator-dependent cardiac patients: A pilot of nonrandomized study.

Authors:  Touraj Babaee; Ali Sadeghpour Tabaei; Jalal Moludi; Seyyed Mostafa Alavi; Sepehr Sadeghpour Tabaei
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.