Literature DB >> 19408075

Fantoni translaryngeal tracheostomy versus ciaglia blue rhino percutaneous tracheostomy: a retrospective comparison.

Duilio Divisi1, Giuseppe Altamura, Sergio Di Tommaso, Gabriella Di Leonardo, Emilio Rosa, Carlo De Sanctis, Roberto Crisci.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the operative technique and complications of the Fantoni tracheostomy (TLT) with those of the Ciaglia Blue Rhino tracheostomy (CBR). We also compared the costs of mini-invasive tracheostomy with those of surgical tracheostomy (ST).
METHODS: Between January 1998 and January 2006, 530 patients needed emergency intubation and protracted assisted ventilation in our department. We performed 470 mini-invasive tracheostomies: as TLT in 350 and as CBR in 120. The time between intubation and tracheostomy was 4 +/- 1 days. Interventions were carried out in our intensive care unit (ICU).
RESULTS: One hundred and nine patients died within 20 +/- 5 days of intervention, but 361 are still alive after 100 +/- 3 months. TLT and CBR complications were independent of the operative technique (P = 0.74, r = 0.285 vs P = 0.61, r = 0.271) or procedure time (P = 0.95, r = 0.297 vs P = 0.92, r = 0.295). Ciaglia Blue Rhino tracheostomy was noted to have a cost-benefit advantage over TLT and ST (P = 0.0002, P = 0.009, P = 0.22, respectively). The average time until decannulation was 20 +/- 1 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Mini-invasive tracheostomies are easy, safe, and fast. Ciaglia Blue Rhino tracheostomy took less time to perform and had fewer complications than TLT, because the technique was simpler.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19408075     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-008-3899-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  21 in total

1.  Technique, complications, and improvements in percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy.

Authors:  P Ciaglia
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Outcome of bedside percutaneous tracheostomy with bronchoscopic guidance.

Authors:  R Hinerman; F Alvarez; C A Keller
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  A simple percutaneous tracheostomy technique.

Authors:  W M Griggs; L I Worthley; J E Gilligan; P D Thomas; J A Myburg
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1990-06

4.  Open versus percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: efficacy and cost analysis.

Authors:  A Grover; J Robbins; P Bendick; M Gibson; M Villalba
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  [Translaryngeal tracheostomy using the Fantoni technique: report of 104 cases].

Authors:  D Divisi; G Altamura; C Battaglia; W Di Francescantonio; E Rosa; G Torresini; C De Sanctis; R Crisci
Journal:  Ann Chir       Date:  2002-02

6.  Comparison of safety and cost of percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy.

Authors:  C P Bowen; L R Whitney; J D Truwit; C G Durbin; M M Moore
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 0.688

7.  Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy: a comparison of single- versus multiple-dilator techniques.

Authors:  J L Johnson; M L Cheatham; S G Sagraves; E F Block; L D Nelson
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Percutaneous tracheostomy with single dilatation technique: a prospective, randomized comparison of Ciaglia blue rhino versus Griggs' guidewire dilating forceps.

Authors:  Sushil P Ambesh; Chandra K Pandey; Shashi Srivastava; Anil Agarwal; Dinesh K Singh
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Percutaneous tracheostomy: Ciaglia Blue Rhino versus Griggs' Guide Wire Dilating Forceps. A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  J M Añón; M P Escuela; V Gómez; A Moreno; J López; R Díaz; J C Montejo; G Sirgo; G Hernández; R Martínez
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.105

10.  Comparison of two percutaneous tracheostomy techniques, guide wire dilating forceps and Ciaglia Blue Rhino: a sequential cohort study.

Authors:  Bernard G Fikkers; Marieke Staatsen; Sabine G G F Lardenoije; Frank J A van den Hoogen; Johannes G van der Hoeven
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-07-05       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy--a review of current techniques and their pitfalls.

Authors:  Jonathan Cools-Lartigue; Ali Aboalsaud; Heather Gill; Lorenzo Ferri
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Is percutaneous tracheostomy the best method in the management of patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation?

Authors:  Duilio Divisi; Giovanni Stati; Andrea De Vico; Roberto Crisci
Journal:  Respir Med Case Rep       Date:  2015-08-01

3.  Impact of bedside percutaneous dilational and open surgical tracheostomy on intracranial pressure, pulmonary gas exchange, and hemodynamics in neurocritical care patients.

Authors:  Martin Kieninger; Martin Windorfer; Christoph Eissnert; Nina Zech; Sylvia Bele; Florian Zeman; Elisabeth Bründl; Bernhard Graf; Holger Künzig
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Percutaneous Tracheostomy in COVID-19 Critically Ill Patients: Experience from 30 Consecutive Procedures.

Authors:  Pietro Bertini; Francesco Forfori; Luca Bruschini; Francesco Corradi; Alessandro Ribechini; Etrusca Brogi; Fabio Guarracino
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-01

5.  Modified translaryngeal tracheostomy for ventilator-dependent cardiac patients: A pilot of nonrandomized study.

Authors:  Touraj Babaee; Ali Sadeghpour Tabaei; Jalal Moludi; Seyyed Mostafa Alavi; Sepehr Sadeghpour Tabaei
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.