Literature DB >> 11028882

Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: Part I. General health evaluation in relation to definition of failure in the Swedish National Total Hip Arthoplasty register.

P Söderman1, H Malchau, P Herberts.   

Abstract

The Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty register, which was started in 1979, is one of the oldest national quality registers in the world and consists of over 160,000 primary operations and 12,500 revisions. The register identifies risk factors for poor outcomes related to the patient, implant and surgical techniques. The end-point for failure, i.e., revision, does not provide information about the patient's general health after the primary procedure. The aim of this study was twofold. First, to validate the end-point for failure in the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty register and secondly, to study general health after total hip arthroplasty. We validated the outcome of 1,056 primary THRs randomly selected from the Discharge register in Sweden by comparing the data to the Swedish THA register. These patients had answered the SF-36 and Nottingham Health Profile questionnaires. By comparing the clinical outcome, measured as general health, with the results obtained from the register, we evaluated the importance of the end-point for failure. We found that the end-point was useful, but further evaluations are desirable. Patients operated on with hip replacement do very well up to 10 years postoperatively and those who are not revised have good general health. The findings in this study can be used as a reference for others as it shows results from a national register, with a random selection of the study cohort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11028882     DOI: 10.1080/000164700317393330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  23 in total

1.  Disability in adults with hip and knee arthroplasty: a French national community based survey.

Authors:  I Boutron; S Poiraudeau; J-F Ravaud; G Baron; M Revel; R Nizard; M Dougados; Ph Ravaud
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  In vitro biological and tribological properties of transparent magnesium aluminate (Spinel) and aluminum oxynitride (ALON®).

Authors:  Subhadip Bodhak; Vamsi Krishna Balla; Susmita Bose; Amit Bandyopadhyay; Uday Kashalikar; Santosh K Jha; Suri Sastri
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Risk factors for dislocation after primary total hip replacement: meta-analysis of 125 studies involving approximately five million hip replacements.

Authors:  Setor K Kunutsor; Matthew C Barrett; Andrew D Beswick; Andrew Judge; Ashley W Blom; Vikki Wylde; Michael R Whitehouse
Journal:  Lancet Rheumatol       Date:  2019-10

4.  Predictors of patient relevant outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a prospective study.

Authors:  A-K Nilsdotter; I F Petersson; E M Roos; L S Lohmander
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Enhanced care for primary hip arthroplasty: factors affecting length of hospital stay.

Authors:  Michalis Panteli; Shayma'u Habeeb; John McRoberts; Matthew J Porteous
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-02-27

6.  What was the survival of megaprostheses in lower limb reconstructions after tumor resections?

Authors:  Rodolfo Capanna; Guido Scoccianti; Filippo Frenos; Antonio Vilardi; Giovanni Beltrami; Domenico Andrea Campanacci
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Importance of the spinopelvic factors on the pelvic inclination from standing to sitting before total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hironori Ochi; Tomonori Baba; Yasuhiro Homma; Mikio Matsumoto; Hidetoshi Nojiri; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Does ion release differ between hip resurfacing and metal-on-metal THA?

Authors:  Antonio Moroni; Lucia Savarino; Matteo Cadossi; Nicola Baldini; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Danish version of the Oxford hip score: Assessed against generic and disease-specific questionnaires.

Authors:  A Paulsen; A Odgaard; S Overgaard
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 10.  Risk factors for revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julian Jz Prokopetz; Elena Losina; Robin L Bliss; John Wright; John A Baron; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.