Literature DB >> 11028141

The effect of cochlear implant use in postlingually deaf adults.

P F Krabbe1, J B Hinderink, P van den Broek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of the use of cochlear implants (CI) on the health status of postlingually deaf adults.
METHODS: Participants comprised 45 postlingually deaf adult multichannel CI users and 46 deaf candidates on the waiting list for a CI. The latter group acted as control subjects to corroborate the validity of retrospective completion of the questionnaires by the CI recipients. Three HRQOL instruments were used: a) a specially developed CI questionnaire (NCIQ); b) a generic HRQOL questionnaire (SF-36); and c) a health-state classification system (HUI-2) suited to estimate single preference scores.
RESULTS: Retrospectively estimated pre-implant scores in the CI user group corresponded very well with the scores in the control group. Postimplant scores in the CI users were substantially higher in all six domains (p < .001) of the NCIQ than the scores in the control group. Effects due to a CI were also observed with the SF-36 in five of the seven domains (p < .01). Statistically significant differences between the two groups (p = .001) were observed in two of the six domains of the HUI-2.
CONCLUSIONS: All three questionnaires detected improvements in HRQOL due to CI use. To make a detailed assessment of the effect of a CI on functional outcomes and well-being, a special purpose HRQOL instrument is far more adequate than a general HRQOL instrument. This study also showed that a CI affects several other health domains besides auditory performance. The effect of CI use on general functioning and well-being proved to be considerable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11028141     DOI: 10.1017/s0266462300102132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  15 in total

1.  Quality of life in postlingually deaf patients following cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Luis Lassaletta; Alejandro Castro; Marta Bastarrica; Maria José de Sarriá; Javier Gavilán
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-07-16       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Meta-analysis of quality-of-life improvement after cochlear implantation and associations with speech recognition abilities.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Michael Bauschard; Jonathan L Hatch; Emily Franko-Tobin; H Richard Droghini; Shaun A Nguyen; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Quality of life and audiologic performance through the ability to phone of cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Cécile Rumeau; Julien Frère; Bettina Montaut-Verient; Alexis Lion; Gérome Gauchard; Cécile Parietti-Winkler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Reliability and validity of the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire in Spanish.

Authors:  Isabel Sanchez-Cuadrado; Javier Gavilan; Rosa Perez-Mora; Elena Muñoz; Luis Lassaletta
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Meta-analysis of Cochlear Implantation Outcomes Evaluated With General Health-related Patient-reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Michael Bauschard; Jonathan L Hatch; Emily Franko-Tobin; Harris Richard Droghini; Craig A Velozo; Shaun A Nguyen; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Health-Related Quality of Life Instruments for Children With Cochlear Implants: Development of Child and Parent-Proxy Measures.

Authors:  Michael F Hoffman; Ivette Cejas; Alexandra L Quittner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  A few years later. Update of the cost-effectiveness of infant pneumococcal vaccination in Dutch children.

Authors:  Pepijn Vemer; Maarten J Postma
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Cost-effectiveness of vaccination against meningococcal B among Dutch infants: Crucial impact of changes in incidence.

Authors:  Koen B Pouwels; Eelko Hak; Arie van der Ende; Hannah Christensen; Germie P J M van den Dobbelsteen; Maarten J Postma
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  How Does Quality of Life Relate to Auditory Abilities? A Subitem Analysis of the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire.

Authors:  Kara J Vasil; Jessica Lewis; Terrin Tamati; Christin Ray; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Quality of Life-CI: Development of an Early Childhood Parent-Proxy and Adolescent Version.

Authors:  Ivette Cejas; Jennifer Coto; Christina Sarangoulis; Chrisanda M Sanchez; Alexandra L Quittner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.