Literature DB >> 11027620

Bacterial DNA methylation and gene transfer efficiency.

S Allamane1, P Jourdes, D Ratel, J M Vicat, I Dupré, M Lainé, F Berger, A L Benabid, D Wion.   

Abstract

The necessary amplification step in bacteria of any plasmid currently used in DNA immunization or gene therapy introduces modification in the nucleotide sequence of plasmid DNA used in gene transfer. These changes affect the adenine and the internal cytosine in respectively all of the GATC and CC(A/T)GG sequences. These modifications which introduce 6-methyladenine and 5-methylcytosine in plasmidic DNA are the consequence of the existence of the bacterial modification systems Dam and Dcm. In eucaryotes, the presence of 5-methylcytosine at dinucleotides -CG- is involved in silencing gene expression, but the possible consequences of the presence of the bacterial G(m)ATC and C(m)C(A/T)GG sequences in the plasmids used in gene transfer experiments are presently unknown. Since the possibility exists to obtain plasmid DNA lacking this specific bacterial pattern of methylation by using (dam(-), dcm(-)) bacteria we performed experiments to compare in vitro and in vivo gene transfer efficiency of a pCMV-luc reporter plasmid amplified either in the JM109 (dam(+), dcm(+)) or JM110 (dam(-), dcm(-)) bacteria. Data obtained demonstrated that the presence of 6-methyladenine in GATC sequences and 5-methylcytosine in the second C of CC(A/T)GG motifs does not reduce the levels of luciferase activity detected following in vitro or in vivo gene transfer. On the contrary, gene transfer with a pCMV-luc amplified in JM109 (dam(+), dcm(+)) bacteria gives greater amounts of luciferase than the same transfection performed with a plasmid amplified in the mutated JM110 (dam(-), dcm(-)) counterpart. Therefore, these data do not suggest that the use of (dam(-), dcm(-)) bacteria to amplify plasmid DNA may increase gene transfer efficiency. However, the persistence of the use of (dam(+), dcm(+)) bacteria in order to amplify plasmid DNA raises the question of the possible biological consequences of the introduction of the bacterial G(m)ATC and C(m)C(A/T)GG sequences in eukaryotic cells or organisms. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11027620     DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun        ISSN: 0006-291X            Impact factor:   3.575


  6 in total

Review 1.  N6-Methyladenine: A Conserved and Dynamic DNA Mark.

Authors:  Zach Klapholz O'Brown; Eric Lieberman Greer
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Amplified fragment length polymorphism reveals specific epigenetic distinctions between Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis isolates of various isolation types.

Authors:  B O'Shea; S Khare; P Klein; A Roussel; L G Adams; T A Ficht; A C Rice-Ficht
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Means, mechanisms and consequences of adenine methylation in DNA.

Authors:  Konstantinos Boulias; Eric Lieberman Greer
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 59.581

Review 4.  Plasmid DNA vaccine vector design: impact on efficacy, safety and upstream production.

Authors:  James A Williams; Aaron E Carnes; Clague P Hodgson
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 14.227

Review 5.  N6-methyladenine: the other methylated base of DNA.

Authors:  David Ratel; Jean-Luc Ravanat; François Berger; Didier Wion
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.345

6.  Heat shock factor 1 counteracts epigenetic silencing of nuclear transgenes in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

Authors:  Daniela Strenkert; Stefan Schmollinger; Michael Schroda
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 16.971

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.