Literature DB >> 11025832

Differences in prognostic factors and outcomes between women and men undergoing coronary artery stenting.

J Mehilli1, A Kastrati, J Dirschinger, H Bollwein, F J Neumann, A Schömig.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Women with coronary artery disease (CAD) are believed to have a higher risk for adverse outcomes than men after conventional coronary interventions. The increasing use of coronary stenting has improved the outcome of patients undergoing coronary interventions, but little is known about the nature of outcomes in men vs women after this procedure.
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether there are sex-based differences in prognostic factors and in early and late outcomes among CAD patients undergoing coronary stent placement. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Inception cohort study, at 2 tertiary referral institutions in Germany. Consecutive series of 1001 women and 3263 men with symptomatic CAD who were treated with stenting between May 1992 and December 1998. Patients who underwent stenting in the setting of acute myocardial infarction were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The combined event rates of death and nonfatal myocardial infarction, assessed at 30 days and 1 year after stenting and compared by sex.
RESULTS: Compared with men, women undergoing coronary stenting were significantly older (mean age, 69 vs 63 years) and more likely to present with diabetes, arterial hypertension, or hypercholesterolemia. Women had less extensive CAD, a less frequent history of myocardial infarction and better preserved left ventricular function than men. Women presented an excess risk of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction only during the early period after stenting: the 30-day combined event rate of death or myocardial infarction was 3.1% in women and 1.8% in men (P =.02) and the multivariate-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for women was 2.02 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27-3.19). At 1 year, the outcome was similar for both women and men (combined event rate for women, 6.0%, and for men, 5.8% (P =.77); multivariate-adjusted HR for women, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.75-1.48]). There was a sex difference in the prognostic value of baseline characteristics: the strongest prognostic factors were diabetes in women and age in men.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that 1-year outcomes of women with CAD undergoing coronary artery stenting are similar to those of men. Despite the similarity in outcomes, there are several sex-specific differences in baseline characteristics, clinical course after the intervention, and relative weight of prognostic factors. JAMA. 2000;284:1799-1805.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11025832     DOI: 10.1001/jama.284.14.1799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  23 in total

1.  Gender differences in therapeutic recommendation after diagnostic coronary angiography: insights from the Coronary Angiography and PCI Registry of the German Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Tobias Heer; Matthias Hochadel; Karin Schmidt; Julinda Mehilli; Ralf Zahn; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Christian Hamm; Michael Böhm; Georg Ertl; Dietrich Andresen; Steffen Massberg; Jochen Senges; Günter Pilz; Anselm K Gitt; Uwe Zeymer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Gender differences in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Birgit Langhans; Tareq Ibrahim; Jörg Hausleiter; Carolin Sonne; Stefan Martinoff; Albert Schömig; Martin Hadamitzky
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Coronary Artery Disease in Postmenopausal Women.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2001-02

Review 4.  Gender differences in cardiovascular therapy: focus on antithrombotic therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Juan Luis Gutiérrez-Chico; Julinda Mehilli
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Temporal changes in outcomes of women and men undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion: 2005-2013.

Authors:  Aurel Toma; Barbara E Stähli; Michael Gick; Miroslaw Ferenc; Kambis Mashayekhi; Heinz Joachim Buettner; Franz-Josef Neumann; Catherine Gebhard
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  In-hospital complications after invasive strategy for the management of Non STEMI: women fare as well as men.

Authors:  Caroline Berthillot; Dominique Stephan; Michel Chauvin; Gerald Roul
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 2.298

7.  Lipid rich plaque, female gender and proximal coronary stent edge dissections.

Authors:  Magdalena Zeglin-Sawczuk; Ik-Kyung Jang; Koji Kato; Taishi Yonetsu; SooJoong Kim; So-Yeon Choi; Christina Kratlian; Hang Lee; Harold L Dauerman
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  Gender disparity in cardiac procedures and medication use for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  John T Nguyen; Alan K Berger; Sue Duval; Russell V Luepker
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Mortality differences between men and women after percutaneous coronary interventions. A 25-year, single-center experience.

Authors:  Mandeep Singh; Charanjit S Rihal; Bernard J Gersh; Veronique L Roger; Malcolm R Bell; Ryan J Lennon; Amir Lerman; David R Holmes
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  The use of risk scores for stratification of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome patients.

Authors:  Ramjane Khalill; Lei Han; Chang Jing; He Quan
Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.