BACKGROUND: There is information suggesting differences and underuse of invasive coronary diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in women compared to men. METHODS: Data from consecutive patients (pts) which were enrolled in the Coronary Angiography and PCI Registry of the German Society of Cardiology were analyzed. We compared gender-related differences in diagnosis and therapeutic recommendation of pts undergoing coronary angiography (XA) for stable coronary artery disease (CAD), non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) and ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). RESULTS: From 2004 until the end of 2009, data of 1,060,542 invasive procedures in 1,014,996 pts were prospectively registered. One-third (34.6%) of them were female. Women less often had significant CAD, irrespective of the indication for XA. In pts with relevant CAD, percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) were recommended in 87.1% of women versus 89.1% of men with STEMI [age-adjusted OR (aOR) 0.98, 95% CI 0.93-1.04], in 67.1 vs. 66.8% in NSTE-ACS (aOR 1.10, 1.07-1.12), and in 50.3 vs 49.4% in stable CAD (aOR 1.07, 1.05-1.09). CONCLUSIONS: In pts with significant CAD, there was no difference in recommendation for PCI between the genders in stable CAD, whereas in STEMI and NSTE-ACS women were treated even more often with PCI. There were only minor differences in referral for CABG between women and men. Hence, our data provide strong evidence against a gender bias in use of invasive therapeutic procedures once the diagnosis of significant CAD has been confirmed.
BACKGROUND: There is information suggesting differences and underuse of invasive coronary diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in women compared to men. METHODS: Data from consecutive patients (pts) which were enrolled in the Coronary Angiography and PCI Registry of the German Society of Cardiology were analyzed. We compared gender-related differences in diagnosis and therapeutic recommendation of pts undergoing coronary angiography (XA) for stable coronary artery disease (CAD), non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) and ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). RESULTS: From 2004 until the end of 2009, data of 1,060,542 invasive procedures in 1,014,996 pts were prospectively registered. One-third (34.6%) of them were female. Women less often had significant CAD, irrespective of the indication for XA. In pts with relevant CAD, percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) were recommended in 87.1% of women versus 89.1% of men with STEMI [age-adjusted OR (aOR) 0.98, 95% CI 0.93-1.04], in 67.1 vs. 66.8% in NSTE-ACS (aOR 1.10, 1.07-1.12), and in 50.3 vs 49.4% in stable CAD (aOR 1.07, 1.05-1.09). CONCLUSIONS: In pts with significant CAD, there was no difference in recommendation for PCI between the genders in stable CAD, whereas in STEMI and NSTE-ACS women were treated even more often with PCI. There were only minor differences in referral for CABG between women and men. Hence, our data provide strong evidence against a gender bias in use of invasive therapeutic procedures once the diagnosis of significant CAD has been confirmed.
Authors: Kimberly A Skelding; Gouthami Boga; Jennifer Sartorius; G Craig Wood; Peter B Berger; Vernon H Mascarenhas; Christopher W Good; Thomas D Scott; James C Blankenship Journal: J Interv Cardiol Date: 2012-12-30 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Leslee J Shaw; C Noel Bairey Merz; Carl J Pepine; Steven E Reis; Vera Bittner; Kevin E Kip; Sheryl F Kelsey; Marian Olson; B Delia Johnson; Sunil Mankad; Barry L Sharaf; William J Rogers; Gerald M Pohost; George Sopko Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-08-21 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Leslee J Shaw; C Noel Bairey Merz; Carl J Pepine; Steven E Reis; Vera Bittner; Sheryl F Kelsey; Marian Olson; B Delia Johnson; Sunil Mankad; Barry L Sharaf; William J Rogers; Timothy R Wessel; Christopher B Arant; Gerald M Pohost; Amir Lerman; Arshed A Quyyumi; George Sopko Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-02-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Tobias Heer; Rudolf Schiele; Steffen Schneider; Anselm K Gitt; Harm Wienbergen; Martin Gottwik; Ulf Gieseler; Thomas Voigtländer; Karl E Hauptmann; Stefan Wagner; Jochen Senges Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2002-03-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Caroline Daly; Felicity Clemens; Jose L Lopez Sendon; Luigi Tavazzi; Eric Boersma; Nicholas Danchin; Francois Delahaye; Anselm Gitt; Desmond Julian; David Mulcahy; Witold Ruzyllo; Kristian Thygesen; Freek Verheugt; Kim M Fox Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-01-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Leslee J Shaw; Richard E Shaw; C Noel Bairey Merz; Ralph G Brindis; Lloyd W Klein; Brahmajee Nallamothu; Pamela S Douglas; Ronald J Krone; Charles R McKay; Peter C Block; Kathleen Hewitt; William S Weintraub; Eric D Peterson Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-03-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Karl Fengler; Georg Fuernau; Steffen Desch; Ingo Eitel; Franz-Josef Neumann; Hans-Georg Olbrich; Antoinette de Waha; Suzanne de Waha; Gert Richardt; Marcus Hennersdorf; Klaus Empen; Rainer Hambrecht; Jörg Fuhrmann; Michael Böhm; Janine Poess; Ruth Strasser; Steffen Schneider; Gerhard Schuler; Karl Werdan; Uwe Zeymer; Holger Thiele Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2014-10-07 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Petra Hillinger; Raphael Twerenbold; Karin Wildi; Maria Rubini Gimenez; Cedric Jaeger; Jasper Boeddinghaus; Thomas Nestelberger; Karin Grimm; Tobias Reichlin; Fabio Stallone; Christian Puelacher; Zaid Sabti; Nikola Kozhuharov; Ursina Honegger; Paola Ballarino; Oscar Miro; Kris Denhaerynck; Temizel Ekrem; Claudia Kohler; Roland Bingisser; Stefan Osswald; Christian Mueller Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Tobias Heer; Matthias Hochadel; Karin Schmidt; Julinda Mehilli; Ralf Zahn; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Christian Hamm; Michael Böhm; Georg Ertl; Hans Martin Hoffmeister; Stefan Sack; Jochen Senges; Steffen Massberg; Anselm K Gitt; Uwe Zeymer Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-03-20 Impact factor: 5.501