Literature DB >> 11023220

Biomechanical comparison of syndesmosis fixation with 3.5- and 4.5-millimeter stainless steel screws.

M C Thompson1, D S Gesink.   

Abstract

Although most authors recommend either 3.5-mm or 4.5-mm cortical screws for syndesmosis fixation, the optimum screw size has yet to be defined. The present study was designed to biomechanically compare syndesmosis fixation with 3.5-mm and 4.5-mm stainless steel screws. Simulated pronation external rotation ankle injuries were created in twelve paired, fresh-frozen cadaveric leg specimens. One limb from each pair received a 3.5-mm tricortical stainless steel screw for syndesmosis fixation (group I), while the contralateral specimen was stabilized using a 4.5-mm screw (group II). Sub-maximal axial ramp (0 to 1200 N) and external rotation/torsional ramp (0 to 5 N-m) loading was performed on each specimen prior to ligament division, following ligament division and following syndesmosis fixation. Axial fatigue testing was then performed at 1.5 Hz for a total of 100,000 cycles (0 to 900 N), and each specimen was subsequently tested to failure in external rotation. Ligament division resulted in syndesmosis widening (p<0.001) and reduced stiffness (p<0.001) during torsional ramp loading. Subsequent syndesmosis screw placement reduced syndesmosis widening (p<0.05) and increased stiffness (p<0.05). Following screw fixation, however, widening remained greater (p<0.005) and stiffness less (p<0.001) than pre-injury levels. No differences between groups I and II were observed during submaximal testing. In external rotation to failure testing, group I failed at a greater angle (38.9 degrees +/- 4.1 degrees vs. 32.0 degrees +/- 3.8 degrees in group II; p<0.05). Failure torque was slightly higher in group I; however, the difference was not statistically significant (17.8 +/- 2.0 N-m vs. 14.3 +/- 2.6 N-m in group II; p=0.082). Five specimens in group I failed by screw pullout and five specimens in group II failed by fibula fracture (p=0.061). The present results suggest that there is no biomechanical advantage of a 4.5-mm screw over a 3.5-mm in fixation of the syndesmosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11023220     DOI: 10.1177/107110070002100904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  17 in total

Review 1.  Conservative and surgical management of acute isolated syndesmotic injuries: ESSKA-AFAS consensus and guidelines.

Authors:  C Niek van Dijk; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Mattia Loppini; Pino Florio; Ludovica Maltese; Mauro Ciuffreda; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  [Problems and controversies in the treatment of ankle fractures].

Authors:  S Rammelt; D Heim; L C Hofbauer; R Grass; H Zwipp
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  An update on the evaluation and treatment of syndesmotic injuries.

Authors:  S Rammelt; P Obruba
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 4.  Diagnosis and treatment of ankle syndesmosis injuries with associated interosseous membrane injury: a current concept review.

Authors:  Guang-Shu Yu; Yan-Bin Lin; Guo-Sheng Xiong; Hong-Bin Xu; You-Ying Liu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Syndesmosis injuries.

Authors:  Kenneth J Hunt
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-12

Review 6.  Evaluating success rate and comparing complications of operative techniques used to treat chronic syndesmosis injuries.

Authors:  Bhaveen H Kapadia; Michael J Sabarese; Dipal Chatterjee; Alexandr Aylyarov; Daniel M Zuchelli; Omar K Hariri; Jaime A Uribe; Justin Tsai
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-05-07

Review 7.  Acute syndesmotic injuries in ankle fractures: From diagnosis to treatment and current concepts.

Authors:  Francesco Pogliacomi; Massimo De Filippo; Daniele Casalini; Alberto Longhi; Fabrizio Tacci; Rocco Perotta; Francesco Pagnini; Silvio Tocco; Francesco Ceccarelli
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-18

8.  Evaluation of the syndesmotic-only fixation for Weber-C ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury.

Authors:  R Mohammed; S Syed; S Metikala; Sa Ali
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 9.  To retain or remove the syndesmotic screw: a review of literature.

Authors:  T Schepers
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Flexible fixation of syndesmotic diastasis using the assembled bolt-tightrope system.

Authors:  Guohui Xu; Wei Chen; Qi Zhang; Juan Wang; Yanling Su; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.