Literature DB >> 11021956

A prospective, randomized, open-label trial comparing telmisartan 80 mg with valsartan 80 mg in patients with mild to moderate hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

T Littlejohn1, W Mroczek, T Marbury, C P VanderMaelen, R F Dubiel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of telmisartan 80 mg with valsartan 80 mg throughout a 24 h dosing interval.
DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point, parallel group study. Treatment efficacy was compared using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), cuff sphygmomanometry and calculated responder rates. Tolerability was assessed by physical examination, laboratory parameters, 12-lead electrocardiogram, blood pressure and heart rate monitoring, and evaluation of adverse events.
SETTING: Thirty-five centres in the United States. PATIENTS: Four hundred and twenty-six patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension entered the study. Ninety-two per cent (n=393) completed the study.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent a four-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period before being randomly assigned to once-daily oral telmisartan 80 mg (n=214) or valsartan 80 mg (n=212) for an eight-week, open-label treatment period.
RESULTS: Treatment with telmisartan was associated with a significantly greater mean reduction from baseline in the last 6 h ABPM mean for diastolic blood pressure compared with the valsartan-treated group (-7.5+/-0.6 mmHg versus -5.2+/-0.6 mmHg, respectively, P<0.01). Secondary analyses showed significantly greater efficacy with telmisartan 80 mg than with valsartan 80 mg, including greater mean reductions from baseline of ABPM (systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure) during the daytime (06:00 to 21:59) and morning (06:00 to11:59) hours, and larger decreases in trough cuff blood pressure (P<0.01). Both treatments showed placebo-like tolerability profiles.
CONCLUSIONS: Telmisartan 80 mg once daily was superior to valsartan 80 mg once daily in reducing diastolic blood pressure during the last 6 h of the 24 h dosing interval. These results may be due to telmisartan's longer plasma half-life or to a higher potency compared with valsartan, such that a higher dose of valsartan may produce effects similar to those of 80 mg telmisartan. These data confirm the long duration of action of telmisartan with consistent and sustained control of blood pressure over 24 h and during the last 6 h of the dosing interval. Both treatments were well tolerated; the adverse event data confirmed the excellent tolerability profiles of telmisartan and valsartan that have been reported previously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11021956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  16 in total

Review 1.  Telmisartan: a review of its use in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  Anna J Battershill; Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Guiding antihypertensive treatment decisions using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Gianfranco Parati
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 3.  Telmisartan: a review of its use in hypertension.

Authors:  M Sharpe; B Jarvis; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  The comparative efficacy and safety of the angiotensin receptor blockers in the management of hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Hazel Mae A Abraham; C Michael White; William B White
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Cardiovascular drug therapy in the elderly: theoretical and practical considerations.

Authors:  Bradley R Williams; Jiwon Kim
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  Antihypertensive efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers as monotherapy as evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Harikrishna Makani; Sripal Bangalore; Azhar Supariwala; Jorge Romero; Edgar Argulian; Franz H Messerli
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 7.  Cardiac and vascular protection: the potential of ONTARGET.

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Anne Jakobsen; Jose Heroys; Ann Ralph; Tomas Rees; Michael Shaw
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2008-03-26

Review 8.  Comparison of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in the treatment of essential hypertension.

Authors:  David H G Smith
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  A chronotherapeutic approach to effective blood pressure management.

Authors:  Peter A Meredith
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Comparison of telmisartan vs. valsartan in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  George Bakris
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.